Cohesion electrostatic

After intimate contact is achieved between adhesive and adherend through wetting, it is believed that permanent adhesion results primarily through forces of molecular attraction. Four general types of chemical bonds are recognized as being involved in adhesion and cohesion electrostatic, covalent, and metallic, which are referred to as primary bonds, and van der Walls forces, which are referred to as secondary bonds. 

The intermolecular forces of adhesion and cohesion can be loosely classified into three categories (7) quantum mechanical forces, pure electrostatic... 

The ionic bond is the most obvious sort of electrostatic attraction between positive and negative charges. It is typified by cohesion in sodium chloride. Other alkali halides (such as lithium fluoride), oxides (magnesia, alumina) and components of cement (hydrated carbonates and oxides) are wholly or partly held together by ionic bonds. 

A surface is that part of an object which is in direct contact with its environment and hence, is most affected by it. The surface properties of solid organic polymers have a strong impact on many, if not most, of their apphcations. The properties and structure of these surfaces are, therefore, of utmost importance. The chemical stmcture and thermodynamic state of polymer surfaces are important factors that determine many of their practical characteristics. Examples of properties affected by polymer surface stmcture include adhesion, wettability, friction, coatability, permeability, dyeabil-ity, gloss, corrosion, surface electrostatic charging, cellular recognition, and biocompatibility. Interfacial characteristics of polymer systems control the domain size and the stability of polymer-polymer dispersions, adhesive strength of laminates and composites, cohesive strength of polymer blends, mechanical properties of adhesive joints, etc. 

Electrostatic painting is the application of electrostatically charged paint particles to an oppositely charged workpiece followed by thermal fusing of the paint particles to form a cohesive paint film. Both waterborne and solvent-borne coatings can be sprayed electrostatically. 

Because of the unavoidable tendency of granular solids to become triboelectrically charged when handled, it is no surprise that electrostatic phenomena are often quite pronounced in fluidized and spouted beds. The vigorous motion of fluidized particles—with constant particle-particle and particle-wall contacts—guarantees that electrical charging will take place. Electrostatic adhesion and cohesion, observed and recorded in the very earliest experimental investigations of fluidization, were immediately identified as experimental nuisances to be overcome. Somewhat later, the hazardous nature of electrostatics came to be appreciated. 

The difference in properties when the aliphatic chain of amine oxide contains more than 14 carbons is attributed to the mismatch of the hydrophobic chain with that of the SDS. The extra terminal segment results in a disruptive effect on the packing of the surface active molecules. The observed association behavior in the case of 0 2 C14-DAO with SDS is then also due to the maximum cohesive interaction between hydrocarbon chains in addition to the reduced electrostatic repulsion in the head groups. Solubilization of the 1 1 association is also determined by this chain length compatibility effect which may contribute to the absence of visible precipitation in C12/C12 and C2 2/ -14 mixtures. Chain length compatibility effects in different systems have been discussed by other investigators (24,25,26). 

It is quite remarkable that electrostatic calculations based on a simple model of integral point charges at the nuclear positions of ionic crystals have produced good agreement with values of the cohesive energy as determined experimentally with use of the Born-Haber cycle. The point-charge model is a purely electrostatic model, which expresses the energy of a crystal relative to the assembly of isolated ions in terms of the Coulombic interactions between the ions. 

Expression (9.15) gives the total electrostatic energy and not the cohesive energy of a molecular crystal. It ignores the quantum-mechanical nature of the charge distribution an electron cannot interact with itself, but just such a self-energy is included in the expression. 

The electrostatic energy of a molecular crystal can be evaluated with summation over the structure factors in Eq. (9.15). But to obtain the cohesive energy of a molecular crystal with such a summation, we would have to subtract the molecular electrostatic energies, which are implicitly included in the result. An alternative is to perform the calculation in direct space. 

The dispersion polymerization system is composed of monomer, solvent, initiator, and stabilizer. The combination of monomer, solvent, and stabilizer is essential for particle preparation. That is to say, the stabilizer is chosen to meet the demand of the monomer and solvent. In any system, the stabilizer has affinity or cohesive strength for both the medium and the polymer particles. In a dispersion polymerization, the medium and polymer particles both are organic compounds. Therefore, it is not rational to rely on dispersion stabilization, which comes from the electrostatic repulsion force between particles. The stabilizer for dispersion polymerization that makes interfacial energy low must have affinity for particles due to the same quality and solvation at the surface of particles. It is desired that the stabilizer be a polymer that indicates a steric stabilization effect on the surface (5). 

The cohesive energy of ionic crystals is mainly due to electrostatic interaction and can be calculated on the basis of a point-charge model. Following Born, the cohesive energy (U) of a crystal containing oppositely charged ions with charges Zj and Zj is written as the sum of two terms, one due to attraction and the other due to repulsion ... 

This indicates a lack of dynamic cohesion within the adducts i.e. the substrate has considerable freedom for reorientation within the receptor. The apparent reason for an absence of mechanical coupling is the nearly cylindrical symmetry of cucurbituril, which allows the guest an axis of rotational freedom when held within the cavity. Hence, the bound substrates show only a moderate increase in tc relative to that exhibited in solution. No relationship exists between values and the thermodynamic stability of the complexes as gauged by K (or K, cf. Tables 1 and 2). It must be concluded that the interior of cucurbituril is notably nonsticky . This reinforces previous conclusions that the thermodynamic affinity within adducts is chiefly governed by hydrophobic interactions affecting the solvated hydrocarbon components, plus electrostatic ion-dipole attractions between the carbonyls of the receptor and the ammonium cation of the ligands. 

The effective magnitude of cohesive effects depends primarily on two factors the intensity and nature of the cohesive forces (e.g., electrostatic, van der Waals, capillary) and the packing density of the material (which determines the number of interparticle contacts per unit area). This dependence on density is the source of great complexity cohesive materials often display highly variable densities that depend strongly on the immediate processing history of the material. 

Electrostatic charges due to ionized acidic or basic amino acids influence protein solubility. At extremes of pH, many poorly soluble proteins are dissolved and their molecular structures unfolded due to surplus of similar repelling charges. Gluten proteins have few charged groups and so are poorly soluble in neutral solution (15). Dispersions of other proteins must be adjusted to their isoelectric point or have salt added to optimize cohesion and adhesion. 

---