Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Clearing field diffusion

Clinically, GM-CSF or G-CSF have been used to accelerate recovery after chemotherapy and total body or extended field irradiation, situations that cause neutropenia and decreased platelets, and possibly lead to fatal septic infection or diffuse hemorrhage, respectively. G-CSF and GM-CSF reproducibly decrease the period of granulocytopenia, the number of infectious episodes, and the length of hospitalization in such patients (152), although it is not clear that dose escalation of the cytotoxic agent and increased cure rate can be rehably achieved. One aspect of the effects of G-CSF and GM-CSF is that these agents can activate mature cells to function more efficiently. This may, however, also lead to the production of cytokines, such as TNF- a, that have some toxic side effects. In general, both cytokines are reasonably well tolerated. The side effect profile of G-CSF is more favorable than that of GM-CSF. Medullary bone pain is the only common toxicity. [Pg.494]

According to this approximation, the drift velocity is proportional to the square of the electric field. This is a clear indication of the importance of the electric field inside an electrostatic precipitator. Equation (13.60) is a valid approximation for large particles [dp > 0.5 m), provided that particle charge is close to the saturation level. In the case of small particles, the effect of diffusion charging must be taken into account. [Pg.1226]

Some of the above discussed precursor phenomena are also observed prior to diffusion driven phase transformations. A typical example are the conventional EM tweed images obtained in the tetragonal parent phase in high Tc superconductors and other ceramics. In a recent survey by Putnis St e of such observations it was concluded that in these cases the tweed contrast resulted from underlying microstructures fomied by symmetry changes driven by cation ordering. These symmetry changes yield a fine patchwork of twin related domains which coarsen when the transfomiation proceeds. However, in view of the diffusion driven character of the latter examples, these cases should be clearly separated from those in the field of the martensites. [Pg.329]

The small and weakly time-dependent CPG that persisLs at longer delays can be explained by the slower diffusion of excitons approaching the localization edge [15]. An alternative and intriguing explanation is, however, field-induced on-chain dissociation, a process that does not depend on the local environment but on the nature of the intrachain state. The one-dimensional Wannier exciton model describes the excited state [44]. Dissociation occurs because the electric field reduces the Coulomb barrier, thus enhancing the escape probability. This picture is interesting, but so far we do not have any clear proof of its validity. [Pg.455]

The velocity, viscosity, density, and channel-height values are all similar to UF, but the diffusivity of large particles (MF) is orders-of-magnitude lower than the diffusivity of macromolecules (UF). It is thus quite surprising to find the fluxes of cross-flow MF processes to be similar to, and often higher than, UF fluxes. Two primary theories for the enhanced diffusion of particles in a shear field, the inertial-lift theory and the shear-induced theory, are explained by Davis [in Ho and Sirkar (eds.), op. cit., pp. 480-505], and Belfort, Davis, and Zydney [/. Membrane. Sci., 96, 1-58 (1994)]. While not clear-cut, shear-induced diffusion is quite large compared to Brownian diffusion except for those cases with very small particles or very low cross-flow velocity. The enhancement of mass transfer in turbulent-flow microfiltration, a major effect, remains completely empirical. [Pg.56]

Important issues in groundwater model validation are the estimation of the aquifer physical properties, the estimation of the pollutant diffusion and decay coefficient. The aquifer properties are obtained via flow model calibration (i.e., parameter estimation see Bear, 20), and by employing various mathematical techniques such as kriging. The other parameters are obtained by comparing model output (i.e., predicted concentrations) to field measurements a quite difficult task, because clear contaminant plume shapes do not always exist in real life. [Pg.63]

In sedimentation velocity experiments, a dilute solution in high centrifugal field gets separated into a clear pure solvent layer and a solution. The initial clear boundary between the two then spreads because of diffusion. The rate of movement of boundary can be measured by suitable methods. Sedimentation constants is given by... [Pg.124]

The maximum value of the diffusivity occurs when zJzi — 0.5 and has a magnitude 0.21w.Zj. For typical meteorological conditions this corresponds to a diffusivity of 0(100 m sec" ) and a characteristic diffusion time defined by of 0(5zi/w ). Yamada (1977), for example, has observed dififusivities of 0(100 m sec" ) when simulating the Wangara day 34 field experiment. Above the surface layer the observational evidence is inadequate to verify more than an order of magnitude estimate of the diffusivity. Clearly there is a need for more field data to establish the shape of the profile in the upper portions of the mixed layer. [Pg.278]

Overall, the rib effects are important when examining the water and local current distributions in a fuel cell. They also clearly show that diffusion media are necessary from a transport perspective. The effect of flooding of the gas-diffusion layer and water transport is more dominant than the oxygen and electron transport. These effects all result in non-uniform reaction-rate distributions with higher current densities across from the channels. Such analysis can lead to optimized flow fields as well as... [Pg.475]


See other pages where Clearing field diffusion is mentioned: [Pg.322]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.2009]    [Pg.2046]    [Pg.1171]    [Pg.1226]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.583]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.495]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.748]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.52 ]




SEARCH



Clear

Clearing diffusion

Clearing field

Clearness

Diffusion field

© 2024 chempedia.info