Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Chromatographic separations optimization

A variable-size simplex optimization of a gas chromatographic separation using oven temperature and carrier gas flow rate as factors is described in this experiment. [Pg.700]

The optimization of chromatographic separations can generally be seen as a compromise between speed, i.e., to produce the largest possible amount of data or substance per unit time, and resolution, i.e., to produce the highest possible quality of data or purity of substance. Obviously the goal for optimization differs according to the purpose of the separation and also between scale of operation. Therefore, different parameters are critical for different situations. Still, some basic rules for optimization may be applied. [Pg.67]

Column chromatographic separations depend on the relative affinity of different proteins for a given stationary phase and for the mobile phase. Association between each protein and the matrix is weak and transient. Proteins that interact more strongly with the stationary phase are retained longer. The length of time that a protein is associated with the stationary phase is a function of the composition of both the stationary and mobile phases. Optimal separation of the protein of interest from other proteins thus can be achieved by careful manipulation of the composition of the two phases. [Pg.21]

For optimization of chromatographic separations the ratio of the time spent by the solute in the stationary phase to the time it spends in the mobile phase is more fundiwentally i tortant. This ratio is called the solute capacity factor and is given by equation (1.8)... [Pg.9]

The variables that control the extent of a chromatographic separation are conveniently divided into kinetic and thermodynamic factors. The thermodynamic variables control relative retention and are embodied in the selectivity factor in the resolution equation. For any optimization strategy the selectivity factor should be maximized (see section 1.6). Since this depends on an understandino of the appropriate retention mechanism further discussion. .Jll be deferred to the appropriate sections of Chapters 2 and 4. [Pg.23]

Mazzotti M., Storti G., Morbidelli M. (1997) Optimal Operation of Simulated Moving Bed Units for Nonlinear Chromatographic Separations, J. Chromatogr. A 769 3-24. [Pg.263]

Spectra which are better resolved (useful for example for the exact determination of coupling constants) can be obtained by carrying out stopped-flow experiments. Here we stop the chromatographic separation after 3 and 7.5 min, optimize the homogeneity (by shimming the magnet) and carry out the desired NMR experiments. [Pg.57]

Dolan, J.W., Snyder, L.R., Djordjevic, N.M., Hill, D.W., Waeghe, T.J. (1999). Reversed-phase liquid chromatographic separation of complex samples by optimizing temperature and gradient time I. Peak capacity limitations. J. Chromatogr. A 857, 1-20. [Pg.31]

Hancock, W.S., Chloupek, R.C., Kirkland, J.J., Snyder, L.R. (1994). Temperature as a variable in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic separations of peptide and protein samples. I. Optimizing the separation of a growth hormone tryptic digest. J. Chromatogr. A 686, 31 -3. [Pg.286]

The instrumental analysis for the identification of UV filters degradation products formed during the fungal treatment process was performed by means of HPLC coupled to tandem mass spectrometry using a hybrid quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometer (HPLC-QqTOF-MS/MS). Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Hibar Purospher STAR HR R-18 ec. (50 mm x 2.0 mm, 5 pm, from Merck). In the optimized method, the mobile phase consisted of a mixture of HPLC grade water and acetonitrile, both with 0.15% formic acid. The injection volume was set to 10 pL and the mobile phase flow-rate to 0.3 mL/min. [Pg.225]

Elaboration of the method for the identification of colour compounds by RPLC MS should comprise four steps (1) spectral characterization of reference materials (standards) and subsequent optimization of detection parameters, as well as those of their chromatographic separation (2) analysis of natural dyestuffs used as colouring materials in historical objects (3) analysis of model samples (dyed fibres, paintings) prepared according to old recipes (4) application of the acquired knowledge to identification of colourants present in historical objects. [Pg.366]

One problem is how to optimize throughput (analysis time) without losing peak capacity. Different approaches have been suggested and led to different developments by instrument and column manufacturers. This section will concentrate on the usage of totally porous particle columns for chromatographic separation only. Alternatives are monolithic columns9 and shell packing materials such as Halo or Poroshell.10-13... [Pg.97]


See other pages where Chromatographic separations optimization is mentioned: [Pg.447]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.556]    [Pg.610]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.622]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.1011]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.788]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.568]    [Pg.138]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.194 ]




SEARCH



Automated optimization of chromatographic separations

Chromatographic optimization

Chromatographic optimizing

Optimization of chromatographic separations

Separator optimized

© 2024 chempedia.info