Choice of State Variables

Extending the thermodynamic potentials to the third order is far from trivial. A vast literature has developed in which the fundamental problems are worked out in detail. The names Toupin (1956), Toupin and Bernstein (1961), Thurston and Bragger (1964), Hajicek (1968, 1969), Tiersten (1971), and Nelson (1979), among others, should be remembered for their important contributions. 

It is impossible within the limits of this volume to go into the details of this complex topic. However, it is necessary to point out a few basic facts and results. The essential objective is to take proper care of the geometrical nonhnearities  

The main point to observe is that in carrying the series expansion of a thermodynamic potential to the next higher order, care must be taken that all terms of this order are included to be consistent. Some of the older attempts of approaching nonlinearity have sirfifered from the deficit that only a few additional terms were retained while some (in some cases even most of them) were arbitrarily disregarded. 

It is obvious that the infinitesimal strain tensor Sy is no longer adeqrrate and it is certainly not surprising that the appropriate replacement is the finite strain tensor Vy as defined in (3.20). 

Let us next look at the consequences for an appropriate formirlation of stress. It turns out that two additional stress tensors are needed to accommodate the requirements made above. The first of these, iA called first Piola-Kirehhoff tensor , is related to the stress tensor introduced in Chap. 3 by 

---

The reaction rates Rt will be functions of the state variables defining the chemical system. While several choices are available, the most common choice of state variables is the set of species mass fractions Yp and the temperature T. In the literature on reacting flows, the set of state variables is referred to as the composition vector [Pg.267]

An environmental system is a subunit of the environment separated from the rest of the world by a boundary. The system is characterized by a specific choice of state variables (such as temperature, pressure, concentration of compound i, etc.), by the relations among these variables, and by the action of the outside world on these variables. 

The choice of state variables follows the example of single component boiling. It is perhaps surprising that we can calculate all the variables listed above from a knowledge of only the component liquid masses in the plate and the plate temperature. These are thus the obvious state variables. It is customary and natural... 

The state of a mixture of gases is completely defined when the values of the state variables are known. The number of state variables is equal to 1 +J the temperature and one state variable per constituent, that is J variables for all of the constituents. Three main choices of state variables exist ... 

The implicit state space form is motivated by a transformation to state space form, discretization of the state space form equations and back transformation. Integrating constrained mechanical systems by first transforming them to state space form is used frequently, [HY90, Yen93]. This leads to approaches known as coordinate splitting methods. The method we discuss here does not carry out the transformation to state space form explicitly. It embeds the choice of state variables in the iterative solution of the nonlinear system (5.3.2), while the integration method always treats the full set of coordinates. 

The thermodynamic properties of a system (pure substance or mixture) are numerous, but experiments have shown that a limited number of these quantities suffice for the knowledge of a system and for the determination of all the other properties. These quantities are called state quantities, all the others being state functions (that is functions of state quantities) which by nature are extensive. The number of state variables is characteristic of the studied system, the choice of state variables among the state quantities being largely arbitrary. 

The choice of other variables R, r, h, 0, and r appropriate for Monte-Carlo averaging is made by pseudo random numbers generated on computer. The reactive cross section can be found by averaging the reaction probability over the impact parameter and rotational state... 

For solutions obeying Henry s law, as for ideal solutions, and for solutions of ideal gases, the chemical potential is a linear function of the logarithm of the composition variable, and the standard chemical potential depends on the choice of composition variable. The chemical potential is, of course, independent of our choice of standard state and composition measure. 

There are only a few reports on chiral phase transfer mediated alkylations". This approach, which seems to offer excellent opportunities for simple asymmetric procedures, has been demonstrated in the catalytic, enantioselective alkylation of racemic 6,7-dichloro-5-methoxy-2-phenyl-l-indanone (1) to form ( + )-indacrinone (4)100. /V-[4-(tnfluoromethyl)phenylmethyl]cinchoninium bromide (2) is one of the most effective catalysts for this reaction. The choice of reaction variables is very important and reaction conditions have been selected which afford very high asymmetric induction (92% cc). A transition state model 3 based on ion pairing between the indanone anion and the benzylcinchoninium cation has been proposed 10°. 

Fickett in "Detonation Properties of Condensed Explosives Calculated with an Equation of State Based on Intermolecular Potentials , Los Alamos Scientific Lab Rept LA-2712 (1962), pp 34-38, discusses perturbation theories as applied to a system of deton products consisting of two phases one, solid carbon in some form, and the other, a fluid mixt of the remaining product species. He divides these theories into two classes conformal solution theory, and what he chooses to call n-fluid theory. Both theories stem from a common approach, namely, perturbation from a pure fluid whose props are assumed known. They differ mainly in the choice of expansion variables. The conformal solution method begins with the assumption that all of the intermolecular interaction potentials have the same functional form. To obtain the equation of state of the mixt, some reference fluid obeying a common reduced equation of state is chosen, and the mixt partition function is expanded about that of the reference fluid... 

In a part of this system which has been studied by Hemley (11), four phases can exist at equilibrium aqueous solution, solid quartz, solid kaolinite (Al1 Si2Or)(OH)4), and potassium mica (KAl tSi 4Oio(OH)2). The variables are p, T, and the various concentrations [K+], [IF], [CT], [Al]a(J, [Si(OH)4].i(, etc. If we apply the phase rule (Equation 1) to equilibria of the four phases mentioned, we find F = 5 -f 2 — 4 = 3. The most practical choice of independent variables would seem to be p, T, and [CT]. These are easy to control, and CT is the one ion that must remain in the aqueous phase since there is no place for it in the solid phases. The phase rule now states that after the values for these... 

Since F is the symbol for the number of independent intensive variables for a system, it is also useful to have a symbol for the number of natural variables for a system. To describe the extensive state of a system, we have to specify F intensive variables and in addition an extensive variable for each phase. This description of the extensive state therefore requires D variables, where D = F + p. Note that D is the number of natural variables in the fundamental equation for a system. For a one-phase system involving only PV work, D = Ns + 2, as discussed after equation 2.2-12. The number F of independent intensive variables and the number D of natural variables for a system are unique, but there are usually multiple choices of these variables. The choice of independent intensive variables F and natural variables D is arbitrary, but the natural variables must include as many extensive variables as there are phases. For example, for the one-phase system described by equation 2.2-8, the F = Ns + 1 intensive variables can be chosen to be T, P, x, x2,xN. and the D = Ns + 2 natural variables can be chosen to be T, P, ni, n2,..., or T, P, xx, x2,..., xN and n (total amount in the system). 

For a given initial charge (BO, xbo) the unknown variables in the above system of equations are Dl, xlD1, x2D2, B2, x B2, x2B2 Therefore, the degree of freedom is (DF) = 2. One of the choices of decision variables could therefore be (x di and x B2). Since we deal with only binaries in this section we drop out the superscripts to indicate the component number. From now on (x1 D/ and x1 B2) will be expressed as (x di and x B2) meaning these variables are specified. With these specifications we can now easily formulate a dynamic optimisation (time optimal control) problem for the no recycle case mentioned above. The problem can be stated as ... 

Complex fluids are the fluids for which the classical fluid mechanics discussed in Section 3.1.4 is found to be inadequate. This is because the internal structure in them evolves on the same time scale as the hydro-dynamic fields (85). The role of state variables in the extended fluid mechanics that is suitable for complex fluids play the hydrodynamic fields supplemented with additional fields or distribution functions that are chosen to characterize the internal structure. In general, a different internal structure requires a different choice of the additional fields. The necessity to deal with the time evolution of complex fluids was the main motivation for developing the framework of dynamics and thermodynamics discussed in this review. There is now a large amount of papers in which the framework is used to investigate complex fluids. In this review we shall list only a few among them. The list below is limited to recent papers and to the papers in which I was involved. 

The phase rule as we have already seen, limits the number of intensive variables which we can fix arbitrarily for a system in equilibrium. This will clearly infiuence our freedom of choice of the variables completely determining the state of a closed system. The various cases which arise may be summarized as follows ... 

In writing these equations we have chosen T and P as the independent state variables other choices could have been made. However, since temperature and pressure are easily measured and controlled, they are the most practical choice of independent variables for processes of interest to chemists and engineers. 

These equations can be made dimensionless by first choosing an appropriate scaling of the time variable, say, t = xlk. Whereas dimensionless equations are not necessary for carrying out a stability analysis, they often simplify the associated algebra, and sometimes useful relationships between parameters that would not otherwise be readily apparent are revealed. It is also important to note that the particular choice of dimensionless variables does not affect any conclusions regarding number of steady states, stability, or bifurcations in other words, the dimensionless equations have the same dynamical properties as the original equations. Introducing the definition t = into the above equations we find ... 

For the Verilog description, previous works consider all declared registers as memorizing, and associate with them a state variable[7]. Although this may lead to a non minimal set of state variables, it is the most obvious choice, since registers can be accessed in several concurrent always statements (but modified in only one to ensure determinism) the decision that a register is a redundant state variable cannot be made locally to an always bloc. In the example of Figures S.a and 6.a, state variables are associated with vO, vl, v2, v3. 

The method of self-optimizing control is applied to a heat integrated prefractionator arrangement. This system has a total of eleven degrees of freedom with six DOF available for optimization when variables with no-steady state effects have been excluded and the duties of the two columns are matched. From the optimization it is found that there is one degree of freedom left for which there is not an obvious choice of control variable. The method of self- optimizing control will be used to find a suitable control variable that will keep the system close to optimum when there are disturbances. 

To sum up, it can be stated that a system (characterized by the independent variables and the boundary conditions) is in equilibrium if the corresponding thermodynamic potential function is at a minimum. There are metastable states, characterized by a relative minimum of the thermodynamic potential function, that can exist for any length of time provided the necessary activation energy is not introduced. A state that is stable under specific boundary conditions may, by a further reduction of the thermodynamic potential function, pass into a more stable state if the boundary conditions of the system are changed. Stable and metastable states must satisfy the extreme condition that the differential of the thermodynamic potential function must be zero, namely, dG = 0, dA = 0, dl-f = 0, d =0 (depending on the choice of independent variables). Because the extreme value of the thermodynamic potential function is at a minimum, all second derivatives must be greater than zero. 

Whatever our choice of independent variables, all we need to know to be sure a system is in the same state at two different times is that the value of each independent variable is the same at both times. 

The choice of the variables depends on the physical process that is being studied. For the simulation of each sequence of runs, the following sea state random variables are selected ... 

You may use similar methods to establish that irrespective of the choice of independent variables or state functions, there exists only a single chemical potential. Ordinarily it is simplest to adopt Hi = G/drii)p p, , as the standard definition. 

We start with a microscopic polymer model, whose state is specifiedby a point in 6N-dimensional phase space, z e f with z = (ri,.... r pj,.... p ), a short notation for the positions and momenta of all N particles. The model is described by the microscopic Hamiltonian H(z) with inter- and intramolecular interactions. The coarse-grained model eliminates some of the (huge number of) microscopic degrees of freedom. The level of detail that is retained is specified by the choice of coarsegrained variables x = (xi,..., ) with... 

---