Choice of Protection Method

The current output of galvanic anodes depends on the specific soil resistivity in the installation area and can only be used in low-resistivity soils for pipelines with a low protection current requirement because of the low driving voltage. Impressed current anode installations can be used in soils with higher specific soil resistivities and where large protection currents are needed because of their variable output voltage. 

Cathodic protection with magnesium anodes can be just as economical as impressed current anode assemblies for pipelines only a few kilometers in length and with protection current densities below 10 fiA m e.g., in isolated stretches of new pipeline in old networks and steel distribution or service pipes. In this case, several anodes would be connected to the pipeline in a group at test points. The distance from the pipeline is about 1 to 3 m. The measurement of the off potential 

Where there is a high protection current requirement, and for long pipelines, the impressed current method is almost always recommended, since it can provide for the increased protection current requirements resulting from branched pipelines by raising the output voltage. The following factors should be taken into 

The housing of the transformer-rectifier unit should he erected in an area with a right-of-way for the pipeline. 

The information in Section 9-1 covers the anode installation. Housing, layout and circuitry of the transformer-rectifier unit are described in Chapter 8, and type and possible choices of anode materials in Chapter 7. 

---

From this it is apparent that the choice of protection method and protection criteria should always be properly tailored. Coatings are usually applied to reduce the protection current requirement as well as to improve the protection current distribution in cathodic internal protection systems, because they raise the polarization parameter (see Sections 2.2.5 and 5.1). If the polarization parameter lies in the same range as the protected object, the current distribution is sufficiently good. 

Couplings with N-protected isoxazolidine-3-carboxylic acid can be performed without particular restrictions of the method, and the use of a mixed anhydride for acylation of amino acids or amide formation has been reported. 179 A similarly free choice of coupling methods is available for the acylation of isoxazolidine-3-carboxylic acid derivatives so far the use of carbodiimide and mixed anhydrides have been reported. 168179 Isoxazolidine-3-carboxylic acid derivatives are listed in Table 7. 

In conclusion, the IBTFA-mediated Hofmann rearrangement is the most convenient method for the synthesis of the N-acylated gem-diaminoalkyl derivatives and is certainly the most frequently used procedure for the generation of peptidyl gem-diaminoalkyl derivatives. However, as mentioned above, this method has limitations with regards to the choice of protecting groups and therefore requires careful consideration when applied to amino acids with reactive side chains. 

Conventional method stepwise synthesis or fragment condensation using an optimized choice of protecting group combination and the most favorable coupling methods 1 8 ... 

There are other aspects of the use of additives that have to be considered. A suitable and reliable dosing system has to be engineered to meet all aspects of cost control, safety and environmental protection. The choice of treatment method has to be an economic balance between some or all, of the following constraints ... 

Several methods relating to hazards analysis and risk assessment exist. They are generally divided into qualitative and quantitative (lEC 61508 lEC 61511). The choice of specific method depends on accident scenario being considered and available data. When a risk evaluated for scenario considered is high, it is necessary to reduce it to an acceptable level using protection layers, each of specified reliability, expressed often as the probability of failure on demand (PFD) (LOPA 2001). 

The coupling method has to reflect kinetics and racemization process during the synthesis The activation step as well as the propriate choice of protecting groups is far from being routine. 

The choice of interlocking method will depend on power supply and drive arrangement to the machine, the degree of the risk being protected against and the consequences of failure of the safety device. The system chosen should be as direct and as simple as possible. Complex systems can be potentially unreliable, have unforeseen fail-to-danger elements and are often difficult to understand, inspect and maintain. 

The higher the costs of connecting the current of an impressed current installation, the more economical galvanic anodes become. Usually the choice of one or the other protection method is made not only from an economic point of view, but also from technical considerations. Only the economic point of view is dealt with here. 

The basic assumption is that the individual always has the choice of whether or not to behave in an unsafe manner. The implication of this assumption is that the responsibility for accident prevention ultimately rests with the individual worker. It also implies that as long as management has expended reasonable efforts to persuade an individual to behave responsibly, has provided training in safe methods of work, and has provided appropriate guarding of hazards or personal protection equipment, then it has discharged its responsibilities for accident prevention. If these remedies fail, the only recourse is disciplinary action and ultimately dismissal. 

The choice of what protective groups to use in the synthesis of each segment was based on three aspects (a) the specific steps chosen to achieve the synthesis of each segment (b) the methods to be used in coupling the various segments, and (c) the conditions needed to deprotect the 42 blocked groups in order to... 

Cathodic protection is unique amongst all the methods of corrosion control in that if required it is able to stop corrosion completely, but it remains within the choice of the operator to accept a lesser, but quantifiable, level of protection. Manifestly, it is an important and versatile technique. 

Table 0.1 shows the enormous scope of corrosion control, and serves to emphasise the fact that it is just as important to avoid certain features in the design of a structure as to apply a particular protective scheme, and it is also apparent from Method I that many of the factors that determine the choice of a metal or a particular protective scheme are outside the realm of metallic corrosion. 

---