Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Charging standard method

In most pKa calculations with the standard method, a moderate to high (

molecular mechanics charge set is used. In cases where protonation induces a large protein conformational relaxation, this combination is likely to give a poor consistency between the two underlying free energy... [Pg.453]

At shorter distances, particularly those characteristic of H-bonded and other charge-transfer complexes, the concepts of partial covalency, resonance, and chemical forces must be extended to intramolecular species. In such cases the distinction between, e.g., the covalent bond and the H-bond may become completely arbitrary. The concept of supramolecular clusters as fundamental chemical units presents challenges both to theory and to standard methods of structural characterization. Fortunately, the quantal theory of donor-acceptor interactions follows parallel lines for intramolecular and intermolecular cases, allowing seamless description of molecular and supramolecular bonding in a unified conceptual framework. In this sense, supramolecular aggregation under ambient thermal conditions should be considered a true chemical phenomenon. [Pg.702]

Choice (D) also yields a +3 charge for Cr, and yet does not conform to standard methods of writing complex ion formulas. [Pg.383]

The HF results generated for representative polyatomic molecules have used the /V-derivatives estimated by finite differences, while the -derivatives have been calculated analytically, by standard methods of quantum chemistry. We have examined the effects of the electronic and nuclear relaxations on specific charge sensitivities used in the theory of chemical reactivity, e.g., the hardness, softness, and Fukui function descriptors. New concepts of the GFFs and related softnesses, which include the effects of molecular electronic and/or nuclear relaxations, have also been introduced. [Pg.475]

Electric Effects. The science of electrocapillarity exists for over 100 years. When a liquid surface is electrically charged, its tension changes, and these changes can be followed quantitatively with the standard methods of measuring 7. It is tempting to apply the notions of electrocapillarity to solid surfaces, and a recent book162) is a particularly rich example. [Pg.57]

Initiation by Primers (and Boosters) is the standard method of initiating secondary explosives. Thus hot wires (or other means) are used to initiate the primer charge (Lead Azide, Mercuric Fulminate etc) explosive whose detonation then initiates the main charge of PETN,... [Pg.372]

The development of standard methods of analysis has been a prime objective of the Analytical Division of the Royal Society of Chemistry and its precursors, the Society of Public Analysts and the Society for Analytical Chemistry, since the earliest of days and the results of this work have been recorded in the pages of The Analyst since its inception in 1876. An Analytical Investigation Scheme was proposed by A. Chaston Chapman in 1902. This later evolved into the Standing Committee on Uniformity of Analytical Methods and was charged with developing standard chemicals and securing comparative analyses of these standard materials. [Pg.1]

The protocol must present an uncertainty budget. Its components should be carefully estimated, and may be stated in standard uncertainties, but expanded uncertainties can have great utility, provided the k factor is carefully chosen and indicated [2, 4, 6]13. All supposa-ble uncertainty sources (of types A and B)14, must be considered. Uncertainty components are concerned with contaminations, matrix effects, corrections, lack of stability or of stoichiometry, impurities in reagents, instrument non-linearities and calibrations, inherent uncertainties in standard methods, and uncertainties from subsample selection. Explicitly excluded may have to be sample selection in the field before submission to the laboratory and contamination prior to sample submission to the laboratory. The responsibility for adhering to the protocol s procedures, for which the planned complete uncertainty budget applies, rests with the laboratory and the analyst in charge of the measurement. [Pg.21]

During the last 25 years X-ray spectroscopy has been intensively developed for plasma diagnostics. Since the first application of X-ray spectrometers on the early fusion devices such as PLT and TFR, it has been used to determine basic plasma parameters such as the temperature of ions and electrons. It is now frequently being applied not only to low density plasmas in tokamaks and astrophysical objects [1], but also to laser-produced plasma [2]. It has been shown, that the precision of plasma parameters as obtained from X-ray spectroscopy is competitive to the standard methods for plasma diagnostics, such as Thomson scattering and charge exchange spectroscopy for electron and ion temperature, respectively [3]. [Pg.183]

Catalytic Cracking Test. A standard microactivity test (MAT) was used to evaluate the conversion and selectivity of catalyst samples. The tests were done at the University of Pittsburgh s Applied Research Center (former Gulf Research Laboratory), a qualified laboratory for MAT evaluations. A standard method, developed by Gulf, was used without modification. A Cincinnati gas oil was cracked under the following conditions cat/oil=3, 16 h 1 WHSV, and 516°C. Prior to charging the reactor, all samples underwent a standard thermal pretreatment. Solids were first heat shocked for 1 h at 593°C. Next, selected materials were impregnated with 3000 ppm Ni and 6000 ppm V, as naphthenates. Then all samples were calcined for 10 h at 538°C. Finally, each material was steamed at 732°C for 14 h in a fluidized bed to produce a catalyst in a simulated equilibrium state. [Pg.420]

Similar to the Ewald method in full periodic boundary conditions, MMM2D is only fast enough to be used for a couple of hundred charges. For larger systems, one needs a more efficient method, which in this case can be obtained by a combination of a standard method for full 3d periodicity, e.g. P M, and the far formula of MMM2D. [Pg.203]

Calculations (PPP and CNDO) point to enhanced negative charge at the 2(5)-position and a dipole moment (55) inverse to that in unsubstituted furan nevertheless, both mono- and dilithiation occur readily at the a-positions as usual and so does the formation of Mannich bases with formaldehyde and dimethylamine.135 Standard methods produce from these derivatives a wide variety of others. [Pg.269]

Adhesion of positively and negatively charged latex was used to estimate the IEP of stainless steel (original and heated in air for 2 hours at 1000°C) [688], Adhesion occurs when the signs of the charge of the studied surface and of the latex are opposite. The same method has been used for other metals [689], The nonzero electrical conductivity of metals excludes measurements of their IEP by means of standard methods. [Pg.88]

The separation of endogenous 17- or 18-hydroxylated corticosteroids of the 21-hydroxylated 4-pregnen series was obtained by capillary electrophoresis of their charged borate chelate complexes (323). Aldosterone, 18-hydroxycorti-costerone, 18-hydroxy-deoxycorticosterone, cortisone, cortisol and 11-deoxycor-tisol are separated and resolved with 400 mM borate buffer at pH 9.0. The corticosteroid/borate chelation complex as indicated by CE data correlated well with 11 B-NMR. The separation of corticosteroids and benzothiazin analogs were studied by MEKC and a comparison with CZE was made (324). Bile salts, which have a similar carbon skeleton to the corticosteroids, were used for the separation of these steroids. A short analysis time, 15 min, and a high number of theoretical plates (150,000-350,000) were obtained. Sodium cholate was found to be very effective. The MEKC method was applied to the determination of the drug substance in tablets and cream formulations. An internal standard method was used for quantitation. The purity of the drug substance was also determined. [Pg.348]


See other pages where Charging standard method is mentioned: [Pg.109]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.673]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.505]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.283]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.25 , Pg.28 ]




SEARCH



Charge Methods

Charging methods

Method standardization

Standard Charge

Standard method

Standardizing method

© 2024 chempedia.info