Chain copolymerization cationic reaction

The above listed monomers polymerize exclusively by cationic ring-opening polymerization. Polymerization of cyclic imino ethers has been reviewed by Saegusa1,4,). In this section we follow mostly the conclusions of the Kyoto group summarizing the applied synthetic methods. Subsequently we describe initiating systems, peculiarities of chain growth, side reactions, copolymerization systems and possible applications, in this order. 

A living cationic polymeriza tion of isobutylene and copolymeriza tion of isobutylene and isoprene has been demonstrated (22,23). Living copolymerizations, which proceed in the absence of chain transfer and termination reactions, yield the random copolymer with narrow mol wt distribution and well-defined stmcture, and possibly at a higher polymerization temperature than the current commercial process. The isobutylene—isoprene copolymers are prepared by using cumyl acetate BCl complex in CH Cl or CH2CI2 at —30 C. The copolymer contains 1 8 mol % trans 1,4-isoprene... 

Another differential reaction is copolymerization. An equi-molar mixture of styrene and methyl methacrylate gives copolymers of different composition depending on the initiator. The radical chains started by benzoyl peroxide are 51 % polystyrene, the cationic chains from stannic chloride or boron trifluoride etherate are 100% polystyrene, and the anionic chains from sodium or potassium are more than 99 % polymethyl methacrylate.444 The radicals attack either monomer indiscriminately, the carbanions prefer methyl methacrylate and the carbonium ions prefer styrene. As can be seen from the data of Table XIV, the reactivity of a radical varies considerably with its structure, and it is worth considering whether this variability would be enough to make a radical derived from sodium or potassium give 99 % polymethyl methacrylate.446 If so, the alkali metal intitiated polymerization would not need to be a carbanionic chain reaction. However, the polymer initiated by triphenylmethyl sodium is also about 99% polymethyl methacrylate, whereas tert-butyl peroxide and >-chlorobenzoyl peroxide give 49 to 51 % styrene in the initial polymer.445... 

Solomon (3, h, 5.) reported that various clays inhibited or retarded free radical reactions such as thermal and peroxide-initiated polymerization of methyl methacrylate and styrene, peroxide-initiated styrene-unsaturated polyester copolymerization, as well as sulfur vulcanization of styrene-butadiene copolymer rubber. The proposed mechanism for inhibition involved deactivation of free radicals by a one-electron transfer to octahedral aluminum sites on the clay, resulting in a conversion of the free radical, i.e. catalyst radical or chain radical, to a cation which is inactive in these radical initiated and/or propagated reactions. 

Hence, cation-radical copolymerization leads to the formation of a polymer having a lower molecular weight and polydispersity index than the polymer got by cation-radical polymerization— homocyclobutanation. Nevertheless, copolymerization occnrs nnder very mild conditions and is regio-and stereospecihc (Bauld et al. 1998a). This reaction appears to occnr by a step-growth mechanism, rather than the more efficient cation-radical chain mechanism proposed for poly(cyclobutanation). As the authors concluded, the apparent suppression of the chain mechanism is viewed as an inherent problem with the copolymerization format of cation-radical Diels-Alder polymerization. ... 

Homo- and copolymerizations involving the monomers depicted in Scheme 1 are chain reactions which can be initiated, at least potentially, by typical free-radical, cationic or anionic promoters. TTie object of the studies reported below is to establish first of all which monomers adapt best to each type of initiation, then what peculiarities (if any) are caused by the presence of the furan ring, compared to the known behaviour of the corresponding aliphatic and/or aromatic homologues and finally to establish the structure-properties relationships of the materials obtained. 

For any specific type of initiation (i.e., radical, cationic, or anionic) the monomer reactivity ratios and therefore the copolymer composition equation are independent of many reaction parameters. Since termination and initiation rate constants are not involved, the copolymer composition is independent of differences in the rates of initiation and termination or of the absence or presence of inhibitors or chain-transfer agents. Under a wide range of conditions the copolymer composition is independent of the degree of polymerization. The only limitation on this generalization is that the copolymer be a high polymer. Further, the particular initiation system used in a radical copolymerization has no effect on copolymer composition. The same copolymer composition is obtained irrespective of whether initiation occurs by the thermal homolysis of initiators such as AIBN or peroxides, redox, photolysis, or radiolysis. Solvent effects on copolymer composition are found in some radical copolymerizations (Sec. 6-3a). Ionic copolymerizations usually show significant effects of solvent as well as counterion on copolymer composition (Sec. 6-4). 

Under the standard conditions, alternating copolymerization is initiated by the insertion of propene to the Pd-carbon bond of Pd(COOMe) species. Addition of a large amount of an oxidant results in shortening the copolymer chain, that is, inhibiting propagation. Thus, with this protocol, dimers were prepared to estimate the enantiopurity of the chiral centers in the polymer main chain [131). For example, a head-to-tail and anti-dimer with >98% ee was obtained in the reaction catalyzed by a cationic Pd-[MeO-BICHEP] complex with 85% selectivity over other diastereomers (Scheme 7.13). 

Whether all chains bear a terminal vinylic double bond has not been clearly established, and it would be somewhat astonishing if vinylic double bonds did not undergo side reactions since their reactivity in cationic polymerization is quite high. However, the occurrence of terminal p-vinyl benzyl groups is confirmed by the fact that the formed macromonomer readily copolymerizes with butyl acrylate. 

During the initial polymerization of trioxane with (C4H9)2OBF3 in melt or solution, no solid polymer is formed, and the reaction medium remains clear. Using a high resolution NMR spectroscope, C. S. H. Chen and A. Di Edwardo observed the appearance of soluble linear polyoxy-methylene chains. In the cationic copolymerization of trioxane with 1,3-dioxolane, V. Jaacks found also that a soluble copolymer forms first and turns later into a crystalline copolymer of different composition. Crystallization and polymerization proceed simultaneously in the solid phase. 

Table III shows the increase of molecular weight of BCMO polymerization with conversion, although the polymer tends to precipitate. The monomer reactivity ratios of DOL-BCMO copolymerization were previously determined as rx (DOL) = 0.65 0.05, r2 (BCMO) = 1.5 0.1 at 0°C. by BF3 Et20 (8). Table IV shows a preparation of block copolymer of DOL, St, and BCMO. In the first step we polymerized DOL and St in the second step we added BCMO to this living system. The copolymer obtained showed an increase of molecular weight, and considerable BCMO was incorporated in the copolymer still remaining soluble in ethylene dichloride. The solubility behavior together with the increase of molecular weight with addition of BCMO shows that this polymer consists of block sequences of DOL-St and (St)-DOL-BCMO. This we call block and random copolymer of DOL-St—BCMO. We can deny the presence of BCMO, St, or DOL homopolymers in this system, but some chain-breaking reactions are unavoidable, leading to copolymer mixtures. Thus, the principle of formation of block copolymers by cationic system is partly substantiated.

On the other hand copolymer with a trioxane unit at the cationic chain end (Pi+) may be converted intp P2+ by cleavage of several formaldehyde units. These side reactions change the nature of the active chain ends without participation of the actual monomers trioxane and dioxo-lane. Such reactions are not provided for in the kinetic scheme of Mayo and Lewis. In their conventional scheme, conversion of Pi+ to P2+ is assumed to take place exclusively by addition of monomer M2. Polymerization of trioxane with dioxolane actually is a ternary copolymerization after the induction period one of the three monomers—formaldehyde— is present in its equilibrium concentration. Being the most reactive monomer it still exerts a strong influence on the course of copolymerization (9). This makes it impossible to apply the conventional copolymerization equation and complicates the process considerably. 

---