Cathode surface controls

Different microstructural regions in a material which has an almost uniform composition can also lead to the formation of corrosion cells (e.g., in the vicinity of welds). Basically, corrosion cells can be successfully overcome by cathodic protection. However, in practice, care has to be taken to avoid electrical shielding by large current-consuming cathode surfaces by keeping the area as small as possible. In general, with mixed installations of different metals, it must be remembered that the protection potentials and the protection range depend on the materials (Section 2.4). This can restrict the use of cathodic protection or make special potential control necessary. 

Maximum yield was obtained when the applied voltage was 13.1 V, the cathode surface area was 4 cm2 and the total CH3I concentration was 35.2 pmol. The C-14 labelled tetramethyllead was isolated by the extraction procedures developed for the Grignard route (vide supra). It was next converted to 14CH3(CH3)2PbCl by controlled oxidation with HC1. 

Electrolytic purification of metals is considered at length in Chapter 17. In essence, metals can be deposited in high purity from solution on a cathodic surface, by careful control of the voltage and other parameters. The anode can be a billet of the impure metal, and the impurities will either stay in solution or form an insoluble anode slime here, both dissolution and reprecipitation of the desired metal are accomplished in a single electrolytic step. Alternatively, a crude solution of the metal ion might be prepared by some other means, and the pure metal deposited on a cathode with an anode of some inert material the product of electrolysis at the anode will normally be oxygen gas. 

The most common species used with SIMS sources are Ar+, 02+, 0 , and N2+. These ions and other permanent gas ions are formed easily with high brightness and stability with the hollow cathode duoplasmatron. Ar+ does not enhance the formation of secondary ions but is popular in static SIMS, in which analysis of the undisturbed surface is the goal and no enhancement is necessary. 02+ and 0 both enhance positive secondary ion count rates by formation of surface oxides that serve to increase and control the work function of the surface. 02+ forms a more intense beam than 0 and thus is used preferentially, except in the case of analyzing insulators (see Chapter 11). In some cases the sample surface is flooded with 02 gas for surface control and secondary ion enhancement. An N2+ beam enhances secondary ion formation, but not as well as 02+. It is very useful for profiling and analysis of oxide films on metals, however. It also is less damaging to duoplasmatron hollow cathodes and extends their life by a factor of 5 or more compared to oxygen. 

At the transition between the two current density ranges, the polarization curve for Cu deposition starts diverging from the calculated Tafel curve. This divergence was attributed to the transition from charge transfer to concentration overvoltage control of the copper reduction. It was concluded from these results that the reduction at the cathode surface of metal ions adsorbed on the particles plays a fundamental role in the codeposition mechanism. 

The implications of the correlation shown in Figure 8.7 are as follows (1) The energy input parameter (based on the luminous gas phase) does not control the deposition of material onto the cathode surface. (2) The current density of a DC glow discharge is the primary operational parameter. (3) The flow rate of monomer does not influence the film thickness growth rate. (4) The film thickness growth rate is dependent on the mass concentration of monomer (cM) in the cathode region rather than the mass input rate (FM). (In these experiments, the system pressure was maintained at a constant value of 50 mtorr, and thus c was a constant.)... 

The equation indicates that cathodic polymerization is controlled by the conditions of the local environment near the cathode. The normalized deposition rate in DC (deposition E) is D.R./[M], not D.R./[FM], and the normalized power input parameter is Wc/S, not WjFM. In DC discharge, the dissociation glow virtually adheres to the cathode surface. Therefore, the equation proves that the dissociation glow controls the deposition rate on the cathode surface. 

The reactions (20) to (22) form the copper equilibrium on the electrode surfaces. Concentration of Cu(I) on the cathode surface affects the deposition rate. The maximum net rate of Cu+ production is at about —50 mV versus Cu/CuSC>4 and at higher overpotentials it decreases. Disturbing the Cu(II)—Cu(I)—Cu equilibrium can cause the formation of copper powder, but this is more a problem on the anode. For the current densities commonly used in electrorefining, the cathode overpotential is between 50 and 100 mV. The system is mainly charge transfer controlled and the effect of mass-transfer polarization is small. If Cu(I) concentration on the cathode surface decreases, mass-transfer polarization will increase, causing more uneven deposit. 

The reactions were carried out in a divided cell of conventional design equipped with a platinum gauze anode and magnetically stirred Hg-pool cathode and immersed in an ice bath. The reference electrode was a silver wire immersed in sat. aq KCl in a Fischer Remote Reference Junction and positioned 1 mm from the cathode surface. Cathode potentials were controlled by a solid-state potentiostat. AIM LiCl solution (50 mL) in the appropriate solvent was placed in the cathode compartment the anolyte was identical, but contained also 95% hydrazine (5 mL). The solvent was purified by pre-electrolysis in an Nj stream for 30 min at a cathode potential of — 1.1 V versus Ag/AgCl for the 1,1-dibromocyclopropanes and —2.0V for 7,7-dichlorobicyclo[4.1.0]heptane. The dihalide (5-7 mmol) was added and electrolysis was allowed to proceed until the current had decayed to background. The catholyte was poured into HjO, extracted with pentane, and the combined extracts were washed with H O and dried (MgSOJ. The pentane was carefully distilled and gave monohalocyclopropane in 80-90% yield. 

A serious limitation of the use of anodic inhibitors is that they must be used in sufficiently high concentration to eliminate all the anodic sites, otherwise the anodic area that remains will carry the whole corrosion current, which is usually cathodically controlled. Intense local corrosion may then result, possibly leading to failure of the specimen. Cathodic inhibitors, on the contrary, are helpful in any concentrations for example, the blanketing of only half the cathodic surface will still roughly halve the corrosion rate. The presence of temporary hardness or magnesium ions can help reduce corrosion through deposition of CaCOs or Mg(OH)2, specifically on the cathodic surfaces where OH is produced in the oxygen absorption reaction ... 

---