Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Catalytic constant, kcat

The following diagram illustrates the reaction of acetylcholinesterase (E) with acetylcholine (S) to produce an acetylenzyme Intermediate (E ) with later hydrolysis of the Intermediate and regeneration of the enzyme.% Is calculated as shown in the diagram. The catalytic constant, kcat, refers to the overall decomposition of the enzyme Intermediate (E.S, E ). [Pg.343]

For a-chymotrypsin, the procedure of active-site titration for the calculation of active enzyme concentration and thus of the catalytic constant kcat is long established. The original active-site titration experiment on a-CT by Hartley and Kilby (Hartley, 1954) was performed with ethyl p-nitrobenzoate (Figure 9.2). [Pg.249]

KDHRF A homologous restriction factor binds to C8 65KDHRF A homologous restriction factor, also known as C8 binding protein interferes with cell membrane pore-formation by C5b-C8 complex Kcat Catalytic constant a measure of the catalytic potential of an enzyme Ka Equilibrium dissociation constant kD Kilodalton Kd Dissociation constant KD Kallidin... [Pg.283]

Km and Umax have different meanings for different enzymes. The limiting rate of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction at saturation is described by the constant kcat, the turnover number. The ratio kcat/Km provides a good measure of catalytic efficiency. The Michaelis-Menten equation is also applicable to bisubstrate reactions, which occur by ternary-complex or Ping-Pong (double-displacement) pathways. [Pg.213]

Let s assume that the rate constant kcat for the formation of products on either subunit is the same, whether only that site or both catalytic sites are occupied. Suppose also that ES, SE, and SES are in equilibrium with the free enzyme and substrate. By following the same procedure that led to the Henri-Michaelis-Menten equation in chapter 7, we can derive an expression for the rate of the enzymatic reaction in terms of [S], AT], and K2. Here we just give the result. [Pg.181]

Another way of evaluating enzymatic activity is by comparing k2 values. This first-order rate constant reflects the capacity of the enzyme-substrate complex ES to form the product P. Confusingly, k2 is also known as the catalytic constant and is sometimes written as kcal. It is in fact the equivalent of the enzyme s TOF, since it defines the number of catalytic cycles the enzyme can undergo in one time unit. The k2 (or kcat) value is obtained from the initial reaction rate, and thus pertains to the rate at high substrate concentrations. Some enzymes are so fast and so selective that their k2/Km ratio approaches molecular diffusion rates (108—109 m s-1). This means that every substrate/enzyme collision is fruitful, and the reaction rate is limited only by how fast the substrate molecules diffuse to the enzyme. Such enzymes are called kinetically perfect enzymes [26],... [Pg.56]

Comparison with similar parameters obtained from reactions with free pyridoxamine indicated that IFABP-PX60 catalyzed transamination some 200 times more efficiently. Analysis of the specific kinetic constants kcat and KM indicated that the observed rate acceleration was due mostly to an increase in substrate binding (50-fold), with a smaller effect on the maximal rate (4-fold). While this is an impressive result, the absolute magnitude of kcat/Ku (0.02 s 1 m 1) makes it clear that this catalyst is still quite primitive compared to natural enzyme systems that occasionally operate with catalytic efficiencies near the diffusion limit. [Pg.118]

Though the values of the Michaels complex (Km 10 4 - 10 5 M) for reactions catalyzed by natural enzymes and catalytic antibodies were found to be of the same order of magnitude, the catalytic constants (kc,) for CAs commonly 104 fold lower than that for correspondent enzymes. Experimental ratio values (kcat/lWat) for CAs ranges within 102-106, while these values for similar enzymatic reactions can reach 1017... [Pg.165]

Affinity labeling agents are intrinsically reactive compounds that initially bind reversibly to the active site of the enzyme then undergo chemical reaction (generally an acylation or alkylation reaction) with a nucleophile on the enzyme (Scheme 8). To differentiate a reversible inhibitor from an irreversible one, often the dissociation constant is written with a capital i, K (65), instead of a small i, K, which is used for reversible inhibitors. The K denotes the concentration of an inactivator that produces half-maximal inactivation. Note that this kinetic Scheme is similar to that for substrate turnover except instead of the catalytic rate constant, kcat for product formation, kmact is used to denote the maximal rate constant for inactivation. [Pg.448]

Figure 1 The effects of a reversible (A) and an irreversible (B) inhibitor on GABA-T activity plotted against time since mixing. C The equations used to calculate the catalytic rate constant (kcat) and the dissociation constant for the inhibitor (Kd). Reactions in A and B were initiated 16-18 seconds before the indicated time zero. Figure 1 The effects of a reversible (A) and an irreversible (B) inhibitor on GABA-T activity plotted against time since mixing. C The equations used to calculate the catalytic rate constant (kcat) and the dissociation constant for the inhibitor (Kd). Reactions in A and B were initiated 16-18 seconds before the indicated time zero.
We used principal component analysis to identify correlated motions in different forms of hPNP, namely, its apo and complexed forms, and assess whether they facilitate the 241-265 loop rearrangement prior to the subsequent phosphorolysis reaction. We compared the principal components for the apo and complexed hPNP simulations, and examined the different correlated motions for each form of the enzyme, comparing directly to the crystallographic B-factors. Finally, via experimental site-directed mutagenesis, several residues implicated in the correlated motion were mutated, and the kinetic constants kcat and KM (fingerprints of catalytic efficiency), were measured to weigh the impact of these residues in the phosphorolytic efficiency. [Pg.350]

A much easier problem is posed by the fact that even the simplest enzymic reaction has two kinetic parameters (a second-order rate constant commonly denoted kcat/Km and a first-order rate constant known as k at the notation may seem confusing to non-enzymologists but these two quantities are quite independent of each other) while the simplest non-enzymic reaction will have one rate constant (call it kune and imagine it, for the sake of argument, to be a first-order rate constant). There are therefore two possible measures of catalytic power, [(kcat/KM)/ kune] and [kcat/kune], so which is correct ... [Pg.1046]

From step 2 of method A, we obtained the catalytic phosphorolysis rate constant (kcat) and Michaelis constant for AMP (Kamp) of the AMP-activated enzyme... [Pg.360]

Fmax is an estimation of the maximum velocity of the reaction (Fig. 4.1) and is the product of kcat and where kcat is the capacity of the enzyme-substrate complex to form product and cq is the enzyme concentration. The cat parameter is also known as the catalytic constant or the turnover number and refers to the number of catalytic cycles or the number of molecules of substrate that one molecule of enzyme can convert to product per unit time. As stated above, Fmax is only an estimation of the maximum velocity of the reaction, since the true maximum velocity is never reached at a finite substrate concentration. [Pg.91]

As opposite to parameter K (or Keq) and kcat, V is not a fundamental property of the enzyme since it depends on its concentration as indicated by Eq. 3.5. This has to be taken into consideration when determining the kinetic parameters. The catalytic rate constant (kcat) is a fundamental property of the enzyme that can be expressed in different ways and in different units, according to how e is expressed (moles gL UL ). If e is expressed in moles L , kcat has dimension of T (known as turnover number). This requires the knowledge of the molecular weight and the specific activity and number of active centers of the enzyme. Sometimes this information is not available so that kcat is expressed in dimensions of M T (mass of substrate converted per unit time and unit of enzyme activity). If U is expressed in international units (lU), then kcat reduces to a dimensionless value of 1, which is to say that it is equivalent to V. [Pg.110]

Where Vmax= kcat[E]o, and Km is equal to the substrate concentration at which v= V2 Vmax. The key to this derivation is that the enzyme substrate complex ES is in dynamic equilibrium with free E and S and the catalytic step proceeds with a first order rate constant kcat- This turnover number kcai is represented by k2 in the scheme in equation (5). [Pg.46]

The use of small, soluble substrates allows the determination of kinetic constants, giving some information on the affinity (from Km values) and catalytic efficiency (kcat Vmax / m)- Substrates in question are effectively two components joined by an ester bond the phenolic component and the sugar moiety. Specificity for both of these components defines the overall catalytic rate of the reaction. The selectivity for each component gives important information for the classification on feruloyl esterases (12). [Pg.259]


See other pages where Catalytic constant, kcat is mentioned: [Pg.54]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.767]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.767]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.957]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.401]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.25 , Pg.30 ]




SEARCH



Catalytic constants

© 2024 chempedia.info