Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

C versus

Figure 9.13 Location of sedimentation boundary after various times in an ultracentrifuge (a) c versus r and (b) dc/dr versus r. Figure 9.13 Location of sedimentation boundary after various times in an ultracentrifuge (a) c versus r and (b) dc/dr versus r.
Machine components ate commonly subjected to loads, and hence stresses, which vary over time. The response of materials to such loading is usually examined by a fatigue test. The cylinder, loaded elastically to a level below that for plastic deformation, is rotated. Thus the axial stress at all locations on the surface alternates between a maximum tensile value and a maximum compressive value. The cylinder is rotated until fracture occurs, or until a large number of cycles is attained, eg, lO. The test is then repeated at a different maximum stress level. The results ate presented as a plot of maximum stress, C, versus number of cycles to fracture. For many steels, there is a maximum stress level below which fracture does not occur called the... [Pg.210]

Fig. 5. Solubility coefficient at 30°C versus boiling point of ester in a low density polyethylene film (18). For unit conversion see equation 6. Fig. 5. Solubility coefficient at 30°C versus boiling point of ester in a low density polyethylene film (18). For unit conversion see equation 6.
Thermal Cracking. Heavy petroleum fractions such as resid are thermally cracked in delayed cokers or flexicokers (44,56,57). The main products from the process are petroleum coke and off-gas which contain light olefins and butylenes. This stream also contains a considerable amount of butane. Process conditions for the flexicoker are more severe than for the delayed coker, about 550°C versus 450°C. Both are operated at low pressures, around 300—600 kPa (43—87 psi). Flexicokers produce much more linear butenes, particularly 2-butene, than delayed cokers and about half the amount of isobutylene (Table 7). This is attributed to high severity of operation for the flexicoker (43). [Pg.367]

Value of the discharge coefficient C for a Herschel-type venturi meter depends upon the Reynolds number and to a minor extent upon the size of the venturi, increasing with diameter. A plot of C versus pipe Reynolds number is given in ASME PTC, op. cit., p. 19. A value of 0.984 can be used for pipe Reynolds numbers larger than 200,000. [Pg.892]

One of the general features of the reactivity of enolate anions is the sensitivity of both the reaction rate and the ratio of C- versus O-alkylation to the degree of aggregation of the enolate. For example, addition of HMPA fiequently increases the rate of enolate alkylation... [Pg.437]

The leaving group in the alkylating reagent has a major effect on whether C- or O-alkylation occurs. In the case of the lithium enolate of acetophenone, for example, C-alkylation is predominant with methyl iodide, but C- and O-alkylation occur to approximately equal extents with dimethyl sulfate. The C- versus O-alkylation ratio has also been studied for the potassium salt of ethyl acetoacetate as a function of both solvent and leaving group. ... [Pg.438]

G c versus weight for polystyrene in the virgin stale. Data of Robertson [76] (M less... [Pg.390]

Equation 18 defmes a parabolic relationship between filtrate volume and time. The expression is valid for any type of cake (i.e., compressible and incompressible). From a plot of V + C versus (t+Tq), the filtration process may be represented by a parabola with its apex at the origin as illustrated in Figure 5. Moving the axes to distances C and Tq provides the characteristic filtration curve for the system in terms of volume versus time. Because the parabola s apex is not located at the origin of this new system, it is clear why the filtration rate at the beginning of the process will have a finite value, which corresponds to actual practice. [Pg.166]

A plot of 1/C versus t gives a straight line with the slope = k = 0.0666 l/gmol s. The eomputer program PROGl determines the rate eonstant for a seeond order reaetion. Equation 3-285 is of the form 1/Y = A -I- BX where the slope B is the rate eonstant k. The results of the eomputer program are shown in Table 3-14. [Pg.194]

In addition to the elimination rate constant, the half-life (T/i) another important parameter that characterizes the time-course of chemical compounds in the body. The elimination half-life (t-1/2) is the time to reduce the concentration of a chemical in plasma to half of its original level. The relationship of half-life to the elimination rate constant is ti/2 = 0.693/ki,i and, therefore, the half-life of a chemical compound can be determined after the determination of k j from the slope of the line. The half-life can also be determined through visual inspection from the log C versus time plot (Fig. 5.40). For compounds that are eliminated through first-order kinetics, the time required for the plasma concentration to be decreased by one half is constant. It is impottant to understand that the half-life of chemicals that are eliminated by first-order kinetics is independent of dose. ... [Pg.272]

Polymer-matrix materials include a wide range of specific materials. Perhaps the most commonly used polymer is epoxy. Other polymers include vinyl ester and polyester. Polymers can be either of the thermoset type, where cross-linking of polymer chains is irreversible, or of the thermoplastic type, where cross-linking does not take place but the matrix only hardens and can be softened and hardened repeatedly. For example, thermoplastics can be heated and reheated, as is essential to any injection-molding process. In contrast, thermosets do not melt upon reheating, so they cannot be injection molded. Polyimides have a higher temperature limit than epoxies (650°F versus 250°F or 350°F) (343°C versus 121°C or 177°C), but are much more brittle and considerably harder to process. [Pg.393]

Fig. 92. Mass spectral parameters pressure (p in torr) and ionic currents (J in relative units) of Li2NbOF5 (A), Na2NbOFs (B) and K2NbOFs (C) versus temperature in °C (after Agulyansky et ah, [383]). Numbers on the curves correspond to ions as shown in Fig. 91. Fig. 92. Mass spectral parameters pressure (p in torr) and ionic currents (J in relative units) of Li2NbOF5 (A), Na2NbOFs (B) and K2NbOFs (C) versus temperature in °C (after Agulyansky et ah, [383]). Numbers on the curves correspond to ions as shown in Fig. 91.
Figure 10. Emf of an Na/S cell at 350 °C versus DOD. Reproduced with permission of Chapman and Hall, London. Figure 10. Emf of an Na/S cell at 350 °C versus DOD. Reproduced with permission of Chapman and Hall, London.
Polymer growth J(c) showed nonlinear monomer concentration dependence in the presence of ATP (Carrier et al., 1984), while in the presence of ADP, the plot of J(c) versus monomer concentration for actin was a straight line, as expected for reversible polymerization. The data imply that newly incorporated subunits dissociate from the filament at a slower rate than internal ADP-subunits in other words, (a) the effect of nucleotide hydrolysis is to decrease the stability of the polymer by increasing k and (b) nucleotide hydrolysis is uncoupled from polymerization and occurs in a step that follows incorporation of a ATP-subunit in the polymer. Newly incorporated, slowly dissociating, terminal ATP-subunits form a stable cap at the ends of F-actin filaments. [Pg.46]

FIGURE 12.IS Plot of relative Mooney viscosity at 120°C versus volume fraction of the fiber for ethylene-propylene-diene monomer (EPDM) mbber-melamine fiber compounds. (From Rajeev, R.S., Bhowmick, A.K., De, S.K., Kao, G.J.P., and Bandyopadhyay, S., Polym. Compos., 23, 574, 2002. With permission.)... [Pg.376]

In order to compare the finite element model with the one-dimensional Chiao model, an extremely simple mesh of only five elements extending in a column from the laminate centerline to the outer surface was used to model the gradients in the laminate through-thickness direction. Figure 7 shows the reaction history (fractional concentration of reactive species, C, versus time) obtained from this run, selected at the location nearest the heated surface. This figure also shows the comparison with the quasi-isothermal and Chiao models. [Pg.278]

Report the concentrations of A and C cells and plot [A] and [C] versus iterations for the last 500 iterations. Determine the average equilibrium concentrations of A and C, along with their standard deviations. Also determine the equilibrium constant Kgq. [Pg.133]

In this case, we do not add the atomic numbers and say that the left side wins. Rather we go down the list and compare each row. In the first row above, we have C versus O. That s it, end of story—the O wins. It doesn t matter what comes in the next two rows. Always look for the first point of difference. So the priorities go like this ... [Pg.138]

Under the conditions used in this study, the catalytic activities were stable for NO reduction for all catalysts. However, in NOj reduction, deactivation was observed. For catalyst 1-7, there was a rapid, reversible deactivation that was more noticeable at lower temperatures. The activity could be restored by removing propene from the feed. Therefore, it was likely due to carbonaceous deposits on the catalyst. In addition, there was slow deactivation. For example, afto the experiment in Table 2 and cleaning in a flow ofN0/O2/H20 (0. l%/4.7%/1.5%, balance He) at SOOT, the catalyst showed an NO conversion of 33% and propene conversion of 42% at 450°C, versus 53 and 99%, respectively, before deactivation. For catalyst 1-5, only slow deactivation was observed. [Pg.704]

Figure 5.3-11. The ratio of by-product Q to desired product C versus rotation speed 7 N NaOH addition (adapted from Paul et ai, 1992). Figure 5.3-11. The ratio of by-product Q to desired product C versus rotation speed 7 N NaOH addition (adapted from Paul et ai, 1992).
Figure 5.179. Determination of a from the C versus time curve. Figure 5.179. Determination of a from the C versus time curve.
Typically, at least two different values of m1 (besides ml = 0) are used because there are invariably phase shifts that arise from various factors that do not depend on the gradient moments, resulting in a non-zero intercept of c > versus mx. Thus, a velocity image is time consuming because each set of measurements with a value of m1 is an image in itself. [Pg.498]


See other pages where C versus is mentioned: [Pg.301]    [Pg.640]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.791]    [Pg.1679]    [Pg.2019]    [Pg.900]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.755]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.666]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.32]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.389 ]




SEARCH



ABS examples of modulus retention () versus temperature (C)

ABS examples of notched impact strengths versus low temperatures (C)

C versus Shore A hardness

C versus quasi-static stress at yield

ECTFE examples of tensile stress (TS) modulus retentions () versus temperature (C)

ETFE examples of tensile stress (TS) elongation at break (EB) retentions () versus temperature (C)

EVOH Example of oxygen permeabilities versus temperatures (C)

HDPE UHMWPE examples of stress at yield retention () versus sub-zero temperatures (C)

HDPE examples of stress at yield retention () versus temperature (C)

HIPS examples of modulus retention () versus temperature (C)

Neat CF PEEK examples of tensile strength retention () versus temperature (C)

Neat CF PEI examples of tensile strength retention () versus temperature (C)

Neat EVA examples of VST (C) versus VA content

Neat GF PA examples of modulus retention () versus temperature (C)

Neat PMP examples of lifetime (h) versus temperature (C)

Neat PMP examples of modulus retention () versus temperature (C)

Neat PP examples of modulus retention () versus temperature (C)

O-versus C-alkylation

PA 12 examples of half life (h) versus temperature (C)

PA 12 examples of tensile strength retention () versus temperature (C)

PAI examples of flexural strength retention () versus temperature (C)

PBI examples of tensile strength retention () versus temperature (C)

PBT examples of stress at yield retention () versus temperature (C)

PC examples of elastic modulus retention () versus sub-zero temperatures (C)

PCTFE examples of flexural modulus retention () versus temperature (C)

PES examples of tensile strength retention () versus temperature (C)

POM examples of stress at yield retention () versus temperature (C)

PPE examples of modulus retention () versus temperature (C)

PPS examples of tensile strength retention () versus temperature (C)

PTFE examples of tensile stress and modulus retentions () versus temperature (C)

PVF examples of tensile stress (TS) elongation at break (EB) retentions () versus temperature (C)

SAN examples of modulus retention () versus temperature (C)

Semi-aromatic PA examples of half-life (h) versus temperature (C)

© 2024 chempedia.info