Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Boundary/boundaries value problem

Using the equilibrium equations of the elasticity theory enables one to determine the stress tensor component (Tjj normal to the plane of translumination. The other stress components can be determined using additional measurements or additional information. We assume that there exists a temperature field T, the so-called fictitious temperature, which causes a stress field, equal to the residual stress pattern. In this paper we formulate the boundary-value problem for determining all components of the residual stresses from the results of the translumination of the specimen in a system of parallel planes. Theory of the fictitious temperature has been successfully used in the case of plane strain [2]. The aim of this paper is to show how this method can be applied in the general case. [Pg.132]

Theory of the fictitious temperature field allows us to analyze the problems of residual stresses in glass using the mathematical apparatus of thermoelasticity. In this part we formulate the boundary-value problem for determining the internal stresses. We will Lheretore start from the Duhamel-Neuinan relations... [Pg.136]

The axial stress is the only stress component which can be determined directly from measurement data. Hence, we have the boundary-value problem with equations (27), (29)-(31) and the boundary conditions (34)-(36). [Pg.137]

In integrated photoelasticity it is impossible to achieve a complete reconstruction of stresses in samples by only illuminating a system of parallel planes and using equilibrium equations of the elasticity theory. Theory of the fictitious temperature field allows one to formulate a boundary-value problem which permits to determine all components of the stress tensor field in some cases. If the stress gradient in the axial direction is smooth enough, then perturbation method can be used for the solution of the inverse problem. As an example, distribution of stresses in a bow tie type fiber preforms is shown in Fig. 2 [2]. [Pg.138]

At sufficiently high frequency, the electromagnetic skin depth is several times smaller than a typical defect and induced currents flow in a thin skin at the conductor surface and the crack faces. It is profitable to develop a theoretical model dedicated to this regime. Making certain assumptions, a boundary value problem can be defined and solved relatively simply leading to rapid numerical calculation of eddy-current probe impedance changes due to a variety of surface cracks. [Pg.141]

The probes are assumed to be of contact type but are otherwise quite arbitrary. To model the probe the traction beneath it is prescribed and the resulting boundary value problem is first solved exactly by way of a double Fourier transform. To get managable expressions a far field approximation is then performed using the stationary phase method. As to not be too restrictive the probe is if necessary divided into elements which are each treated separately. Keeping the elements small enough the far field restriction becomes very week so that it is in fact enough if the separation between the probe and defect is one or two wavelengths. As each element can be controlled separately it is possible to have phased arrays and also point or line focussed probes. [Pg.157]

Due to its importance the impulse-pulse response function could be named. .contrast function". A similar function called Green s function is well known from the linear boundary value problems. The signal theory, applied for LLI-systems, gives a strong possibility for the comparison of different magnet field sensor systems and for solutions of inverse 2D- and 3D-eddy-current problems. [Pg.372]

This transfomi also solves the boundary value problem, i.e. there is no need to find, for an initial position x and final position a ", tlie trajectory that coimects the two points. Instead, one simply picks the initial momentum and positionp, x and calculates the classical trajectories resulting from them at all times. Such methods are generally referred to as initial variable representations (IVR). [Pg.2315]

Here we suggest an alternative route to the problem in which the equations of motion are formulated as a boundary value problem. This limits the... [Pg.263]

This treatment of reaction at the limit of bulk diffusion control is essentially the same as that presented by HugoC 69j. It is attractive computationally, since only a single two-point boundary value problem must be solved, namely that posed by equations (11.15) and conditions (11.16). This must be re-solved each time the size of the pellet is changed, since the pellet radius a appears in the boundary conditions. However, the initial value problem for equations (11.12) need be solved only once as a preliminary to solving (11.15) and (11.16) for any number of different pellet sizes. [Pg.117]

In practice it would not be reasonable to solve the balances at the limit of Knudsen diffusion control by considering the n simultaneous boundary value problems (11.7). All the partial pressures can be expressed in terms of by integrating equations (11,25), with the result... [Pg.120]

Equations (11.111) - (11.113) define a boundary value problem for a pair of simultaneous second order differential equations in and x, subject... [Pg.155]

The weighted residual method provides a flexible mathematical framework for the construction of a variety of numerical solution schemes for the differential equations arising in engineering problems. In particular, as is shown in the followmg section, its application in conjunction with the finite element discretizations yields powerful solution algorithms for field problems. To outline this technique we consider a steady-state boundary value problem represented by the following mathematical model... [Pg.41]

Modelling of steady-state free surface flow corresponds to the solution of a boundary value problem while moving boundary tracking is, in general, viewed as an initial value problem. Therefore, classification of existing methods on the basis of their suitability for boundary value or initial value problems has also been advocated. [Pg.101]

Submitting the main topic, we deal with models of solids with cracks. These models of mechanics and geophysics describe the stationary and quasi-stationary deformation of elastic and inelastic solid bodies having cracks and cuts. The corresponding mathematical models are reduced to boundary value problems for domains with singular boundaries. We shall use, if it is possible, a variational formulation of the problems to apply methods of convex analysis. It is of importance to note the significance of restrictions stated a priori at the crack surfaces. We assume that nonpenetration conditions of inequality type at the crack surfaces are fulfilled, which improves the accuracy of these models for contact problems. We also include the modelling of problems with friction between the crack surfaces. [Pg.1]

In the sequel, we consider concrete boundary conditions for the above models to formulate boundary value problems. Also, restrictions of the inequality type imposed upon the solutions are introduced. We begin with the nonpenetration conditions in contact problems (see Kravchuk, 1997 Khludnev, Sokolowski, 1997 Duvaut, Lions, 1972). [Pg.13]

Let a solid body occupy a domain fl c with the smooth boundary L. The deformation of the solid inside fl is described by equilibrium, constitutive and geometrical equations discussed in Sections 1.1.1-1.1.5. To formulate the boundary value problem we need boundary conditions at T. The principal types of boundary conditions are considered in this subsection. [Pg.16]

Utilizing this approach, we construct the analytical solutions for a few one-dimensional unilateral boundary value problems considered in Chapter 2. [Pg.48]

In this section we define trace spaces at boundaries and consider Green s formulae. The statements formulated are applied to boundary value problems for solids with cracks provided that inequality type boundary conditions hold at the crack faces. [Pg.49]

In this chapter we analyse a wide class of equilibrium problems with cracks. It is well known that the classical approach to the crack problem is characterized by the equality type boundary conditions considered at the crack faces, in particular, the crack faces are considered to be stress-free (Cherepanov, 1979, 1983 Kachanov, 1974 Morozov, 1984). This means that displacements found as solutions of these boundary value problems do not satisfy nonpenetration conditions. There are practical examples showing that interpenetration of crack faces may occur in these cases. An essential feature of our consideration is that restrictions of Signorini type are considered at the crack faces which do not allow the opposite crack faces to penetrate each other. The restrictions can be written as inequalities for the displacement vector. As a result a complete set of boundary conditions at crack faces is written as a system of equations and inequalities. The presence of inequality type boundary conditions implies the boundary problems to be nonlinear, which requires the investigation of corresponding boundary value problems. In the chapter, plates and shells with cracks are considered. Properties of solutions are established existence of solutions, regularity up to the crack faces, convergence of solutions as parameters of a system are varying and so on. We analyse different constitutive laws elastic, viscoelastic. [Pg.69]

Proof. We introduce the penalty operator p w) = — w — ) and consider the auxiliary boundary value problem with the positive parameter e > 0,... [Pg.71]

We use the Galerkin approach to prove the existence of the solution to the boundary value problem (2.9)-(2.11). It is well known that the eigenvalue functions... [Pg.72]

Proof. We put p = pi,P2,Po)- Let s, 5 be positive parameters. The following auxiliary boundary value problem is analysed at the first stage ... [Pg.90]

As for approximate methods of finding crack shapes we refer the reader to (Banichuk, 1970). Qualitative properties of solutions to boundary value problems in nonsmooth domains are in (Oleinik et al., 1981 Nazarov, 1989 Nazarov, Plamenevslii, 1991 Nicaise, 1992 Maz ya, Nazarov, 1987 Gris-vard, 1985,1991 Kondrat ev et al., 1982 Kondrat ev, Oleinik, 1983 Dauge, 1988 Costabel, Dauge, 1994 Sandig et al., 1989 Movchan A.B., Movchan N.V., 1995). [Pg.106]

By the above properties of x°, (x°)> oiie can easily verify that the constructed function x = (IR, w) justifies the following boundary value problem ... [Pg.127]

We consider a boundary value problem for equations describing an equilibrium of a plate being under the creep law (1.31)-(1.32). The plate is assumed to have a vertical crack. As before, the main peculiarity of the problem is determined by the presence of an inequality imposed on a solution which represents a mutual nonpenetration condition of the crack faces... [Pg.171]

In this section we consider the boundary value problem for model equations of a thermoelastic plate with a vertical crack (see Khludnev, 1996d). The unknown functions in the mathematical model under consideration are such quantities as the temperature 9 and the horizontal and vertical displacements W = (w, w ), w of the mid-surface points of the plate. We use the so-called coupled model of thermoelasticity, which implies in particular that we need to solve simultaneously the equations that describe heat conduction and the deformation of the plate. The presence of the crack leads to the fact that the domain of a solution has a nonsmooth boundary. As before, the main feature of the problem as a whole is the existence of a constraint in the form of an inequality imposed on the crack faces. This constraint provides a mutual nonpenetration of the crack faces ... [Pg.198]

In this section cracks of minimal opening are considered for thermoelastic plates. It is proved that the cracks of minimal opening provide an equilibrium state of the plate, which corresponds to the state without the crack. This means that such cracks do not introduce any singularity for the solution, and actually we have to solve a boundary value problem without the crack. [Pg.211]

The boundary value problem (3.144), (3.147), (3.148) is analogous to that considered in the previous section. The only difference between these problems is that instead of (3.146), in the previous section the following condition. [Pg.214]


See other pages where Boundary/boundaries value problem is mentioned: [Pg.138]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.167]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.252 ]




SEARCH



Boundary Problem

Boundary Value Problems Poisson equation

Boundary Value Problems and Modeling

Boundary Value Problems differences

Boundary Value Problems dimension

Boundary Value Problems dispersion

Boundary Value Problems for Analytic Functions

Boundary Value Problems weak solution

Boundary Value Problems weighted residual methods

Boundary conditions Value Problem

Boundary value

Boundary value problem

Boundary value problem

Boundary value problem direction

Boundary value problem, conditionally stable

Boundary value problems Neumann problem

Boundary value problems classical finite difference

Boundary value problems computational parameters

Boundary value problems concentrated sources

Boundary value problems conditionally stable case

Boundary value problems diffusion equation

Boundary value problems diffusion modeling

Boundary value problems equations

Boundary value problems finite difference

Boundary value problems finite difference schemes

Boundary value problems integrals

Boundary value problems models

Boundary value problems numerical solutions

Boundary value problems overview

Boundary value problems scaling

Boundary value problems viscoelastic

Boundary-value problem for

Boundary-value problems continuation

Case boundary value problems

Critical case problems boundary value problem

Differential equations boundary value problems

Differential equations diffusion modeling, boundary value problems

Dimensional variables boundary value problem

Electrostatic Boundary Value Problem for a Metal Sphere

Finite difference approximation of the boundary-value problem

Finite element solution of boundary-value problems

First boundary value problem

Initial-boundary-value problems

Linear boundary value problems

Mixed boundary value problem

Nonlinear boundary value problems

Nonlinear, Coupled, Boundary-Value Problem

Numerical Solutions to Two-Point Boundary Value Problems

Numerical methods boundary value problems

Ordinary differential equations, boundary value problems

Problem second boundary value

Problem third boundary value

Proportional boundary value problems

Second order boundary value problems

Series Solutions for Nonlinear Boundary Value Problems

Singularly perturbed boundary value problem

Solution of Split Boundary—Value Problems

Solution of the boundary value problem

Solving Boundary Value Problems

Solving Linear Boundary Value Problems Using Maples dsolve Command

Special Boundary Value Problems

Split boundary value problems

Stationary solutions, boundary value problem

Steady-state model boundary value problem

Sturm-Liouville boundary-value problem

The First and Second Boundary Value Problems

The General Mixed Boundary Value Problem

The first boundary value problem

The fourth boundary value problem

The second boundary value problem

The third boundary value problem

Thermoviscoelastic Boundary Value Problems

Transmission boundary-value problem

Two point boundary value problem

Use of Matrizant in Solving Boundary Value Problems

Variational boundary value problem

© 2024 chempedia.info