Boundary conditions Value Problem

The value of the parameter a is chosen in such a way that the function y x) — sin ax satisfies the boundary conditions of problem (14) ... 

For a given mass transfer problem, the above conservation equations must be complemented with the applicable initial and boundary conditions. The problem of finding the mathematical function that represents the behaviour of the system (defined by the conservation equations and the appropriate set of initial and boundary conditions), is known as a boundary value problem . The boundary conditions specifically depend on the nature of the physicochemical processes in which the considered component is involved. Various classes of boundary conditions, resulting from various types of interfacial processes, will appear in the remainder of this chapter and Chapters 4 and 10. Here, we will discuss some simple boundary conditions using examples of the diffusion of a certain species taken up by an organism ... 

The axial stress is the only stress component which can be determined directly from measurement data. Hence, we have the boundary-value problem with equations (27), (29)-(31) and the boundary conditions (34)-(36). 

This treatment of reaction at the limit of bulk diffusion control is essentially the same as that presented by HugoC 69j. It is attractive computationally, since only a single two-point boundary value problem must be solved, namely that posed by equations (11.15) and conditions (11.16). This must be re-solved each time the size of the pellet is changed, since the pellet radius a appears in the boundary conditions. However, the initial value problem for equations (11.12) need be solved only once as a preliminary to solving (11.15) and (11.16) for any number of different pellet sizes. 

B. Expresses the eigenvalue of the original equation as a sum of eigenvlaues (whose values are determined via boundary conditions as usual) of the lower-dimensional problems. 

Submitting the main topic, we deal with models of solids with cracks. These models of mechanics and geophysics describe the stationary and quasi-stationary deformation of elastic and inelastic solid bodies having cracks and cuts. The corresponding mathematical models are reduced to boundary value problems for domains with singular boundaries. We shall use, if it is possible, a variational formulation of the problems to apply methods of convex analysis. It is of importance to note the significance of restrictions stated a priori at the crack surfaces. We assume that nonpenetration conditions of inequality type at the crack surfaces are fulfilled, which improves the accuracy of these models for contact problems. We also include the modelling of problems with friction between the crack surfaces. 

In the sequel, we consider concrete boundary conditions for the above models to formulate boundary value problems. Also, restrictions of the inequality type imposed upon the solutions are introduced. We begin with the nonpenetration conditions in contact problems (see Kravchuk, 1997 Khludnev, Sokolowski, 1997 Duvaut, Lions, 1972). 

Let a solid body occupy a domain fl c with the smooth boundary L. The deformation of the solid inside fl is described by equilibrium, constitutive and geometrical equations discussed in Sections 1.1.1-1.1.5. To formulate the boundary value problem we need boundary conditions at T. The principal types of boundary conditions are considered in this subsection. 

In this section we define trace spaces at boundaries and consider Green s formulae. The statements formulated are applied to boundary value problems for solids with cracks provided that inequality type boundary conditions hold at the crack faces. 

In this chapter we analyse a wide class of equilibrium problems with cracks. It is well known that the classical approach to the crack problem is characterized by the equality type boundary conditions considered at the crack faces, in particular, the crack faces are considered to be stress-free (Cherepanov, 1979, 1983 Kachanov, 1974 Morozov, 1984). This means that displacements found as solutions of these boundary value problems do not satisfy nonpenetration conditions. There are practical examples showing that interpenetration of crack faces may occur in these cases. An essential feature of our consideration is that restrictions of Signorini type are considered at the crack faces which do not allow the opposite crack faces to penetrate each other. The restrictions can be written as inequalities for the displacement vector. As a result a complete set of boundary conditions at crack faces is written as a system of equations and inequalities. The presence of inequality type boundary conditions implies the boundary problems to be nonlinear, which requires the investigation of corresponding boundary value problems. In the chapter, plates and shells with cracks are considered. Properties of solutions are established existence of solutions, regularity up to the crack faces, convergence of solutions as parameters of a system are varying and so on. We analyse different constitutive laws elastic, viscoelastic. 

We consider a boundary value problem for equations describing an equilibrium of a plate being under the creep law (1.31)-(1.32). The plate is assumed to have a vertical crack. As before, the main peculiarity of the problem is determined by the presence of an inequality imposed on a solution which represents a mutual nonpenetration condition of the crack faces... 

In this subsection we establish the exact form of boundary conditions holding on for the solution 9,x) to problem (3.98). The arguments are formal in the sense that the solution is assumed sufficiently smooth. For brevity, hereafter we denote the quantities IF, w, and 0 by IF, w, and 9, indicating each time the value of the variable t at which the corresponding relations hold. Moreover, we assume that 5 = 1. 

The boundary value problem (3.144), (3.147), (3.148) is analogous to that considered in the previous section. The only difference between these problems is that instead of (3.146), in the previous section the following condition. 

In this section we analyse the contact problem for a curvilinear Timoshenko rod. The plastic yield condition will depend just on the moments m. We shall prove that the solution of the problem satisfies all original boundary conditions, i.e., in contrast to the preceding section, we prove existence of the solution to the original boundary value problem. 

The equations (5.376)-(5.379) could be considered when t = 0. In this case we see that the obtained equations with the boundary condition (5.380) exactly coincide with the elliptic boundary value problem (5.285)-(5.289). The a priori estimate of the corresponding solution ui, Wi, mi, ni is as follows,... 

The most useful mathematical formulation of a fluid flow problem is as a boundary value problem. This consists of two main parts a set of differential equations to be satisfied within a region of interest and a set of boundary conditions to be satisfied on the surfaces of that region. Sometimes additional conditions are also of interest, eg, when one is investigating the stability of a flow. 

In mathematical language, the propagation problem is known as an initial-value problem (Fig. 3-2). Schematically, the problem is characterized by a differential equation plus an open region in which the equation holds. The solution of the differential equation must satisfy the initial conditions plus any side boundary conditions. 

Diffusion problems in one dimension lead to boundaiy value problems. The boundaiy conditions are applied at two different spatial locations at one side the concentration may be fixed and at the other side the flux may be fixed. Because the conditions are specified at two different locations, the problems are not initial value in character. It is not possible to begin at one position and integrate directly because at least one of the conditions is specified somewhere else and there are not enough conditions to begin the calculation. Thus, methods have been developed especially for boundary value problems. 

It should be noted that the normality conditions, arising from the work assumption applied to inelastic loading, ensure the existence and uniqueness of solutions to initial/boundary value problems for inelastic materials undergoing small deformations. Uniqueness of solutions is not always desirable, however. Inelastic deformations often lead to instabilities such as localized deformations. It is quite possible that the work assumption, which is essentially a stability postulate, is too strong in these cases. Normality is a necessary condition for the work assumption. Instabilities, while they may occur in real deformations, are therefore likely to be associated with loss of normality and violation of the work assumption. 

These conditions govern the flow and are therefore of crucial importance. For each condition (see Table 11.2) the flow value and the scalar values are discussed separately. The table contains volumetric sources, which are nor strictly speaking boundary conditions in a mathematical sense. For the CFD engineer they nevertheless define the problem and are therefore included in this table. The problem must also not be overspecified. 

These coupled second-order partial differential equations do not have a closed-form solution. Accordingly, the approximate numerical technique of finite differences is employed. First, however, the boundary conditions must be prescribed in order to complete the formulation of the problem. Symmetry of the laminate about several planes permits reduction of the region of consideration to a quarter of the laminate cross section in the y-z plane at any value of x as shown in Figure 4-52. There, along the stress-free upper surface. 

Boundary value problems where conditions are specified at two (or, rarely, more) values of the independent variable. 

The solution of boundary value problems depends to a great degree on the ability to solve initial value problems.) Any n -order initial value problem can be represented as a system of n coupled first-order ordinary differential equations, each with an initial condition. In general... 

This equation, known as the frequency equation, has two solutions for op-. When substituted in either of the preceding equations, each one of these gives a definite value for A1/A2. This means that there are two solutions for this example, which are of the form Ai sin(ft>/) and A2 sin(ft)/). As with many such problems, the final answer is the superposition of the two solutions with the final amplitudes and frequencies determined by the boundary conditions. 

The forward shooting method seems straightforward but is troublesome to use. What we have done is to convert a two-point boundary value problem into an easier-to-solve initial value problem. Unfortunately, the conversion gives a numerical computation that is ill-conditioned. Extreme precision is needed at the inlet of the tube to get reasonable accuracy at the outlet. The phenomenon is akin to problems that arise in the numerical inversion of matrices and Laplace transforms. 

The boundary conditions for engineering problems usually include some surfaces on which values of the problem unknowns are specified, for instance points of known temperature or initial species concentration. Some other surfaces may have constraints on the gradients of these variables, as on convective thermal boundaries where the rate of heat transport by convection away from the surface must match the rate of conductive transport to the surface from within the body. Such a temperature constraint might be written ... 

It is necessary to specify two conditions for the complete posing of this or that problem. The assigned values of y and Ay suit us perfectly and lie in the background a widespread classification which will be used in the sequel. When equation (6) is put together with the values yi and A yi given at one point, they are referred to as the Cauchy problem. Combination of two conditions at different nonneighboring points with equation (6) leads to a boundary-value problem. 

For the second-order difference equations capable of describing the basic mathematical-physics problems, boundary-value problems with additional conditions given at different points are more typical. For example, if we know the value for z = 0 and the value for i = N, the corresponding boundary-value problem can be formulated as follows it is necessary to find the solution yi, 0 < i < N, of problem (6) satisfying the boundary conditions... 

---