Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Blocking interface single

Self-assembly of the diblock polypeptide into core-shell micellar stmctures occurred above 10 °C. Oxidation of the cysteine residues in the self-assembled state resulted in the formation of intermolecular disulfide bridges that were subsequently demonstrated to stabilize the stmcture toward disassembly either at low temperature or in the presence of organic co-solvents. Other block copolymer architeaures have been described in which cross-linking sites are either localized within a single block or at block interfaces. ... [Pg.94]

The above-mentioned models differ in the relation that is derived between the rate of pull-out of the individual chain and the crack velocity. These models also differ in their interpretation of the threshold stress and the threshold toughness (Go). Also, V is expected to be dependent on the configuration of the connector chain at the interface. The value of v when connector chain crosses the interface just once is higher than the value when the chain forms multiple stitches, even though Go is not altered. When the chain forms multiple stitches, the block and tackle effect ensures that the viscous processes dominate even at lower velocities, and V is reduced by a factor of N from the value obtained from the single crossing case. These models are discussed by Brown and coworkers [45,46]. [Pg.117]

The Alexander approach can also be applied to discover useful information in melts, such as the block copolymer microphases of Fig. 1D. In this situation the density of chains tethered to the interface is not arbitrary but is dictated by the equilibrium condition of the self-assembly process. In a melt, the chains must fill space at constant density within a single microphase and, in the case of block copolymers, minimize contacts between unlike monomers. A sharp interface results in this limit. The interaction energy per chain can then be related to the energy of this interface and written rather simply as Fin, = ykT(N/Lg), where ykT is the interfacial energy per unit area, q is the number density of chain segments and the term in parentheses is the reciprocal of the number of chains per unit area [49, 50]. The total energy per chain is then ... [Pg.44]

In view of the fact that the above techniques examine single fibers embedded in a matrix block, application of the experimental measurements to practical fiber composites may be limited to those with small fiber volume fractions where any effects of interactions between neighboring fibers can be completely neglected. To relate the interface properties with the gross performance of real composites, the effects of the fiber volume fraction have to be taken into account. To accommodate this important issue, a modified version of the fiber pull-out test, the so-called microbundle pull-out test, has been developed recently by Schwartz and coworkers (Qui and Schwartz, 1991, 1993 Stumpf and Schwartz, 1993 Sastry et al., 1993). In... [Pg.55]

Summary The analysis of supramolecular structures containing polymers, and the discussion about the effect of polymeric materials with different chemical structures that form inclusion complexes is extensively studied. The effect of the inclusion complexes at the air-water interface is discussed in terms on the nature of the interaction. The entropic or enthalpic nature of the interaction is analyzed. The description of these inclusion complexes with different cyclodextrines with several polymers is an interesting way to understand some non-covalent interaction in these systems. The discussion about the generation and effect of supramolecular structures on molecular assembly and auto-organization processes is also presented in a single form. The use of block copolymers and dendronized polymers at interfaces is a new aspect to be taken into account from both basic and technological interest. The effect of the chemical structure on the self-assembled systems is discussed. [Pg.207]


See other pages where Blocking interface single is mentioned: [Pg.274]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.2748]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.830]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.998]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.2240]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.197]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.274 ]




SEARCH



Blocking interface

© 2024 chempedia.info