Interface blocking

The situation that no charge transfer across the interface occurs is named the ideal polarized or blocked interface. Such interfaces do not permit, due to thermodynamic or kinetic reasons, either electron or ion transfer. They possess Galvani potentials fixed by the electrolyte and charge. Of course, the ideal polarizable interface is practically a limiting case of the interfaces with charge transfer, because any interface is always permeable to ions to some extent. Therefore, only an approximation of the ideal polarizable interface can be realized experimentally (Section III.D). 

Often a non-blocking interface will behave like a resistance (/ ct) and capacitance (Q,) in parallel. This leads to a semicircle in the impedance plane which has a high frequency limit at the origin and a low frequency limit at Z = (Fig. 10.4). At the maximum of the semicircle if the angular frequency is then ctQin>max = fro which dl can be evaluated. 

Fig. 10.3 Impedance diagrams for (a) a blocking interface (b) a blocking interface when the associated bulk impedance is taken into account.

Fig. 10.4 Impedance diagrams for a non-blocking interface when (a) bulk effects are neglected (b) bulk effects are taken into account. The impedance diagrams are different if diffusional effects are significant.

Having discussed the way in which blocking interfaces behave we must now consider how blocking metallic contacts can be made on a given material, e.g. a ceramic electrolyte. Frequently a relatively inert metal such as Pt or Au is evaporated onto a ceramic material which has been polished... 

The interface structure for non-blocking interfaces is similar to that for related blocking interfaces. Thus the distribution of charge at the C/ Ag4Rbl5 interface will be similar to that at the Ag/Ag4Rbl5 interface. The major difference is that there is one particular interfacial potential difference at which the silver electrode is in equilibrium with Ag ions in the bulk electrolyte phase. At this value of A, there is a particular charge on the electrolyte balanced by an equal and opposite charge — on the metal. At any potential different from value of q different... 

The reference electrode is placed as close as possible to the working electrode so as to minimise the part of the response due to the bulk phase. In order to measure the electrical characteristics of a blocking interface, e.g. C/Ag Rblj, using a three electrode cell the Ag working electrode is simply replaced by a C electrode. 

The relationship between current and overpotential at the non-blocking interface is generally dependent on both the interface structure and the number of mobile species in the contacting phases. The simplest situation is that represented by an interface of the type Ag/Ag4Rbl5 where (i) the Helmoltz model of the interface is appropriate and (ii) there is only one mobile species in the electrolyte (Ag" ). In this case the relationship between i and is a linear one at low values of rj (rj < 10 mV) ... 

Fig. 10.14 Impedance diagram due to a blocking interface (a) a perfectly smooth interface (b) rough electrode.

A number of non-blocking interfaces can be formed where neither of the phases is a simple metal. Some examples are ... 

Many electrode processes are more complex than those discussed above. Besides this, the impedance of an interface is dependent on its microscopic structure which, in the case of a solid electrode, can have an important influence. Impedance measurements can be used to study complicated corrosion phenomena (Chapter 16), blocked interfaces (i.e. where there is no redox process nor adsorption/desorption), the liquid/liquid interface2425, transport through membranes26, the electrode/solid electrolyte interface etc. Experimental measurements always furnish values of Z and Z" or their equivalents Y and Y", or of the complex permittivities e and e" (e = Y/icoCc, Cc being the capacitance of the empty cell). In this section we attempt to show how to... 

Termination in a large resistance, i.e. a blocked interface such as a metal totally covered with oxide or a highly resistive membrane used in ion exchange selective electrodes (Section 13.6) (Fig. 11.18c). This is sometimes referred to as the finite Warburg impedance. 

Df varying between 2, for a porous electrode, and 3 for a smooth electrode. In the case of a blocked interface, the conclusions up to now are that there is no simple relation between a and the fractal dimension. However, the analogy seems useful from an interpretative point of view. Reviews of the response at fractal and rough electrodes have recently appeared31 32. 

Interfaces, including blocked interfaces, liquid/liquid interfaces, electrode/solid electrolyte interfaces, etc. 

The impedance of an interface also depends on its microscopic structure. For example, a porous electrode complicates the impedance of an interface. Nevertheless, although impedance is sometimes very complicated, impedance measurements are still used extensively to study complicated corrosion phenomena, blocked interfaces, the liquid/liquid interface, transport through... 

Interesting antenna systems based on polymers have also been designed by Fox and co-workers [26], They prepared a series of well-defined block copolymers labeled with aromatic chromophores and demonstrated that directional singlet energy migration across the block interface takes place, whereas extensive exciplex formation, a decay channel which dissipates electronic energy in flexible polymers, is strongly inhibited in these special polymers. 

After development, the toner pattern is transferred to a sheet of paper placed face-to-face with the photoconductor. To overcome the electrostatic and van der Waals forces holding the charged powder to the photoconductor surface, an electric field is applied through the paper, e.g. by means of a corona spray or a biased, conformable semiconductive roller (Figure 12). The paper must present an electrically blocking interface to the toner. 

---