Block copolymers structure determination

In mean field theory, two parameters control the phase behavior of diblock copolymers the volume fraction of the A block /A, and the combined interaction parameter xTak- V. where Xab is the Flory-Huggins parameter that quantifies the interaction between the A and B monomers and N is the polymerization index [30], The block copolymer composition determines the microphase morphology to a great extent. For example, comparable volume fractions of block copolymer components result in lamella structure. Increasing the degree of compositional asymmetry leads to the gyroid, cylindrical, and finally, spherical phases [31]. 

Si NMR of siloxane systems has been used in studying organosilicone containing block copolymers to determine block length and chemical redistribution during polymerization. (85) Block copolymers of bisphenol A polycarbonate (BPAP) and polydimethyl-siloxane (PDMS) [20] were studied by both and Si NMR to determine a variety of structural parameters. 

Figure 14 Structures of the rac and meso rotomers that lead to isotactic and atactic polymer blocks in the polymerization of polypropylene. An example of an isotactic-atactic block copolymer is shown. The composition of the block copolymer is determined by the equilibrium constant for the interconversion between rac and meso forms of the catalyst. (Redrawn from Ref. 88.)...

Optical rotation (OR) readings increased with polymerization time and eventually leveled off. GPC measurement showed approximately 50 mol.% consumption of rac-LA. In the second step, an equimolar quantity of (R)-SB(OH)2 (with respect to the S enantiomer) was introduced. In subsequent polymerization, a gradual decrease in OR was observed. Taking into account the determined stereoelectivity coefficient. Pm = 0.96, for the final poly(rac-LA), the gradient poly[(S,S)-lA-grad- R,R)-lA] rather than the block copolymer structure was expected. Indeed, homodecoupled NMR spectra showed, apart from the strong signal of the isotactic mmm... 

It is important to recognize that the following analytical methods essentially determine EO-PO ratio ( H NMR, IR, cleavage methods) or even simply alkylene oxide content (compleximetric methods) of the analyte, and as such are not specific quantitative or qualitative methods for poloxamers, since EO-PO copolymers of a different structure (for instance, random copolymers, or PO-EO-PO block copolymers) may respond to the methods in a way indistinguishable from poloxamers. The principal technique that permits definitive identification of a sample as a poloxamer is C NMR, which allows structural details, such as the distribution of EO and PO units along the polymer chain, to be elucidated [10]. 

Blockcopolymer microphase separation [9] Depending on the length of chemically different blocks of monomers in a block copolymer, ordered nanostructures can be obtained in bulk samples and thin films. The film morphology can differ significantly from the bulk morphology, but because the structure is determined by the pair-pair interaction of monomers and/or an interface, and it is a thermodynamically stable structure, it is classified as self-assembly. 

Statistical and block copolymers based on ethylene oxide (EO) and propylene oxide (PO) are important precursors of polyurethanes. Their detailed chemical structure, that is, the chemical composition, block length, and molar mass of the individual blocks may be decisive for the properties of the final product. For triblock copolymers HO (EO) (PO)m(EO) OH, the detailed analysis relates to the determination of the total molar mass and the degrees of polymerization of the inner PPO block (m) and the outer PEO blocks (n). 

Polymer Synthesis and Characterization. This topic has been extensively discussed in preceeding papers.(2,23,24) However, we will briefly outline the preparative route. The block copolymers were synthesized via the sequential addition method. "Living" anionic polymerization of butadiene, followed by isoprene and more butadiene, was conducted using sec-butyl lithium as the initiator in hydrocarbon solvents under high vacuum. Under these conditions, the mode of addition of butadiene is predominantly 1,4, with between 5-8 mole percent of 1,2 structure.(18) Exhaustive hydrogenation of polymers were carried out in the presence of p-toluenesulfonylhydrazide (19,25) in refluxing xylene. The relative block composition of the polymers were determined via NMR. 

From a morphological point of view, block copolymer micelles consist of a more or less swollen core resulting from the aggregation of the insoluble blocks surrounded by a corona formed by the soluble blocks, as decribed in Sect. 2.3. Experimental techniques that allow the visualization of the different compartments of block copolymer micelles will be presented in Sect. 2.4. Other techniques allowing micellar MW determination will also be briefly discussed. Micellar dynamics and locking of micellar structures by cross-linking will be commented on in Sects. 2.5 and 2.6, respectively. 

The more recently developed cryo-TEM technique has started to be used with increasing frequency for block copolymer micelle characterization in aqueous solution, as illustrated by the reports of Esselink and coworkers [49], Lam et al. [50], and Talmon et al. [51]. It has the advantage that it allows for direct observation of micelles in a glassy water phase and accordingly determines the characteristic dimensions of both the core and swollen corona provided that a sufficient electronic contrast is observed between these two domains. Very recent studies on core-shell structure in block copolymer micelles as visualized by the cryo-TEM technique have been reported by Talmon et al. [52] and Forster and coworkers [53]. In a very recent investigation, cryo-TEM was used to characterize aqueous micelles from metallosupramolecular copolymers (see Sect. 7.5 for further details) containing PS and PEO blocks. The results were compared to the covalent PS-PEO counterpart [54]. Figure 5 shows a typical cryo-TEM picture of both types of micelles. 

In addition to the previously mentioned driving forces that determine the bulk state phase behavior of block copolymers, two additional factors play a role in block copolymer thin films the surface/interface energies as well as the interplay between the film thickness t and the natural period, Lo, of the bulk microphase-separated structures [14,41,42], Due to these two additional factors, a very sophisticated picture has emerged from the various theoretical and experimental efforts that have been made in order to describe... 

The value of the modulus and the shape of the modulus curve allow deductions concerning not only the state of aggregation but also the structure of polymers. Thus, by means of torsion-oscillation measurements, one can determine the proportions of amorphous and crystalline regions, crosslinking and chemical non-uniformity, and can distinguish random copolymers from block copolymers. This procedure is also very suitable for the investigation of plasticized or filled polymers, as well as for the characterization of mixtures of different polymers (polymer blends). 

Thin films of block copolymer melts, and block copolymers adsorbed at the liquid-liquid interface, have been investigated using specular reflectivity (largely neutron reflectivity due to the ability to vary the scattering contrast). Off-specular reflection is, in principle, a powerful method for determining in-plane structure in block copolymer films but is not yet widely used. 

---