Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface BET, area determinations

A sulfonated ion exchanger catalyst (Research Institute of Synthetic Resins and Varnishes, Pardubice, Czechoslovakia) was a macroreticular styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer containing 25% divinylbenzene and 2.4 meq/g of —SO3H groups. It was dried prior to using at 90°C/14 Torr. The BET surface area, determined in a dry state, was 49 m2/g, and the mean pore size was around 100 A. [Pg.27]

The adsorbate most commonly used for BET surface area determinations is nitrogen at 77 K (liquid nitrogen temperature). The... [Pg.134]

Another difficulty resides in the extrapolation down to very small crystal sizes ( 10 A) of stoichiometries, i.e., monolayer capaeities established for much larger crystals of the pure metal (e.g., a metal black) by means of a nitrogen BET surface area determination. There is no guarantee that because of different stoichiometries on surface atoms of different coordination numbers the stoichiometries established for the bulk metal will not change for very small erystals. There are some indications that such a change may take place (26). [Pg.157]

The obtained mixed oxides were characterized by BET surface area determinations, X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) analyses, Raman spectroscopy, UV-VIS spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The BET specific surface area measurements were carried out on a Micromeritics Pulse Chemisorb 2705 analyser using nitrogen at 77 K ( single point method). The samples were previously outgassed under helium flow at 473 K. [Pg.843]

A similar interference by oxygen may also have affected the pioneering chemisorption studies by Brunauer and Emmett. Studies using hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide were carried out in order to determine active surface areas, which were all found to be much smaller than the total (BET) surface area determined by nitrogen physisorption. [Pg.293]

Table 13.1 BET surface area determination and turnover number (TON) values. Table 13.1 BET surface area determination and turnover number (TON) values.
Table 13.5 BET surface area determination and acid/base site ratio. ... Table 13.5 BET surface area determination and acid/base site ratio. ...
Prepare a 0.1 M solution of iron(III) chloride acidified with nitric acid. By the slow addition of ammonia to the boiling solution, as in Sec. 13.3.4, precipitate the hydroxide or hydrous oxide, wash thoroughly and dry at 110 C. Then roast at 550 C in a muffle furnace. Grind a portion to a very fine powder and submit to XRD and compare the pattern with that of a-Fe203. Obtain a thermogravimetric curve for the llO C dried powder. Carry out a BET surface area determination on the final product. [Pg.189]

Brunauer (see Refs. 136-138) defended these defects as deliberate approximations needed to obtain a practical two-constant equation. The assumption of a constant heat of adsorption in the first layer represents a balance between the effects of surface heterogeneity and of lateral interaction, and the assumption of a constant instead of a decreasing heat of adsorption for the succeeding layers balances the overestimate of the entropy of adsorption. These comments do help to explain why the model works as well as it does. However, since these approximations are inherent in the treatment, one can see why the BET model does not lend itself readily to any detailed insight into the real physical nature of multilayers. In summary, the BET equation will undoubtedly maintain its usefulness in surface area determinations, and it does provide some physical information about the nature of the adsorbed film, but only at the level of approximation inherent in the model. Mainly, the c value provides an estimate of the first layer heat of adsorption, averaged over the region of fit. [Pg.653]

To obtain the monolayer capacity from the isotherm, it is necessary to interpret the (Type II) isotherm in quantitative terms. A number of theories have been advanced for this purpose from time to time, none with complete success. The best known of them, and perhaps the most useful in relation to surface area determination, is that of Brunauer, Emmett and Teller. Though based on a model which is admittedly over-simplified and open to criticism on a number of grounds, the theory leads to an expression—the BET equation —which, when applied with discrimination, has proved remarkably successful in evaluating the specific surface from a Type II isotherm. [Pg.42]

Molecular area, a (Ar) of argon at 77 K on graphitized carbon blacks (Argon BET plots constructed with p (liquid) surface areas determined by BET-nitrogen, with a (Na)... [Pg.75]

Striking confirmation of the conclusion that the BET area derived from a Type IV isotherm is indeed equal to the specific surface is afforded by a recent study of a mesoporous silica, Gasil I, undertaken by Havard and Wilson. This material, having been extensively characterized, had already been adopted as a standard adsorbent for surface area determination (cf. Section 2.12). The nitrogen isotherm was of Type IV with a well defined hysteresis loop, which closed at a point below saturation (cf. F, in Fig. 3.1). The BET area calculated from it was 290 5 0 9 m g , in excellent agreement with the value 291 m g obtained from the slope of the initial region of the plot (based on silica TK800 as reference cf. p. 93). [Pg.168]

The development of microporosity during steam activation was examined by Burchell et al [23] in their studies of CFCMS monoliths. A series of CFCMS cylinders, 2.5 cm in diameter and 7.5 cm in length, were machined from a 5- cm thick plate of CFCMS manufactured from P200 fibers. The axis of the cylinders was machined perpendicular to the molding direction ( to the fibers). The cylinders were activated to bum-offs ranging from 9 to 36 % and the BET surface area and micropore size and volume determined from the Nj adsorption isotherms measured at 77 K. Samples were taken from the top and bottom of each cylinder for pore sfructure characterization. [Pg.186]

The presence of closed pores was demonstrated by Kozawa [22] by measuring the BET surface area of EMD samples of various particle sizes. Kozawa s new method for the determination of the closed pore is based on the relationship of the BET surface area and the particle size, by extrapolating the surface area value to zero particle size (Fig. 17). Table 8 shows the percentage of closed pores of various EMD samples. [Pg.124]

The responses chosen all relate to important foam properties. We believed that yi, the emulsion droplet size, determines y2, the cell size in the resultant foam, and we wished to determine whether this is true over this range of formulations. The foam pore size ys should determine the wetting rate y7, so these responses could be correlated, and yg, the BET surface area, should be related to these as well. The density y and density uniformity ys are critical to target performance as described above, and ys, the compressive modulus, is an important measure of the mechanical properties of the foam. [Pg.78]

The reason for enhancement of adsorption performance of PA/AC was considered to be due to combination effect of increase of BET surface area and chemical modification by the treatment with PA. Consequently, lwt%-PA/AC was determined to be a best candidate as an adsorbent for removing benzene, toluene, p-xylene, methanol, ethanol, and iso-propanol. Therefore, lwt%-PA/AC was used as the adsorbent to investigate the adsorption isotherm, adsorption and desorption performance. [Pg.459]

The reduced magnetite with alumina was found to have a N2 BET surface area of 29 m per gram of catalyst. When adsorbing N2 dissociatively it was found that 2.2 mL [standard conditions, i.e. 273 K and 1 bar (= 100000 Pa)] of N2 could be adsorbed per gram of catalyst. Assuming that the atomic nitrogen forms a c(2x2) overlayer on the Fe(lOO) surface determine the iron area per gram of catalyst. The lattice distance of iron is 0.286 nm. [Pg.429]

BET surface areas (SA/m2g-i) were measured by N2 adsorption at 77 K. The SA of Z1O2 was 49 m2g-i. The SA of some ZV samples was determined after the various treatments. All these samples had SA values ranging from 45 to 49 m2g-t, slightly smaller than those of zirconia. [Pg.692]

Besides supported (transition) metal catalysts, structure sensitivity can also be observed with bare (oxidic) support materials, too. In 2003, Hinrichsen et al. [39] investigated methanol synthesis at 30 bar and 300 °C over differently prepared zinc oxides, namely by precipitation, coprecipitation with alumina, and thermolysis of zinc siloxide precursor. Particle sizes, as determined by N2 physisorpt-ion and XRD, varied from 261 nm for a commercial material to 7.0 nm for the thermolytically obtained material. Plotting the areal rates against BET surface areas (Figure 3) reveals enhanced activity for the low surface area zinc... [Pg.169]

BET method. The most commonly used method for determining the specific surface area is the so-called BET method, which obtained its name from three Nobel prize winners Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (1938). It is a modification of the Langmuir theory, which, besides monolayer adsorption, also considers multilayer adsorption. The equation allows easy calculation of the surface area, commonly referred to as the BET surface area ( bet). From the isotherms also pore-radii and pore-volumes can be calculated (from classical equation for condensation in the pores). [Pg.100]


See other pages where Surface BET, area determinations is mentioned: [Pg.540]    [Pg.636]    [Pg.636]    [Pg.898]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.1878]    [Pg.898]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.607]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.636]    [Pg.636]    [Pg.898]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.1878]    [Pg.898]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.607]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.621]    [Pg.621]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.103]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.156 , Pg.166 ]




SEARCH



BET

BET area

BET surface

Betting

Surface area determination

Surface determination

© 2024 chempedia.info