Betting

An excellent example of work of this type is given by the investigations of Benson and co-workers [127, 128]. They found, for example, a value of = 276 ergs/cm for sodium chloride. Accurate calorimetry is required since there is only a few calories per mole difference between the heats of solution of coarse and finely divided material. The surface area of the latter may be determined by means of the BET gas adsorption method (see Section XVII-5). 

This is useful since c can be estimated by means of the BET equation (see Section XVII-5). A number of more or less elaborate variants of the preceding treatment of lateral interaction have been proposed. Thus, Kiselev and co-workers, in their very extensive studies of physical adsorption, have proposed an equation of the form... 

Because of their prevalence in physical adsorption studies on high-energy, powdered solids, type II isotherms are of considerable practical importance. Bmnauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) [39] showed how to extent Langmuir s approach to multilayer adsorption, and their equation has come to be known as the BET equation. The derivation that follows is the traditional one, based on a detailed balancing of forward and reverse rates. 

Although the preceding derivation is the easier to follow, the BET equation also may be derived from statistical mechanics by a procedure similar to that described in the case of the Langmuir equation [41,42]. 

The BET equation filled an annoying gap in the interpretation of adsorption isotherms, and at the time of its appearance in 1938 it was also hailed as a general method for obtaining surface areas from adsorption data. The equation can be put in the form... 

The very considerable success of the BET equation stimulated various investigators to consider modifications of it that would correct certain approximations and give a better fit to type II isotherms. Thus if it is assumed that multilayer formation is limited to n layers, perhaps because of the opposing walls of a capillary being involved, one... 

Equation XVII-78 turns out to ht type II adsorption isotherms quite well—generally better than does the BET equation. Furthermore, the exact form of the potential function is not very critical if an inverse square dependence is used, the ht tends to be about as good as with the inverse-cube law, and the equation now resembles that for a condensed him in Table XVII-2. Here again, quite similar equations have resulted from deductions based on rather different models. 

As with the BET equation, a number of modihcations of Eqs. XVII-77 or XVn-79 have been proposed, for example Ref. 71. FHH-type equations go to inhnite him thickness (i.e., bulk liquid), as P - F and this cannot be the case if the liquid does not wet the solid, and Adamson [72] proposed... 

The characteristic isotherm concept was elaborated by de Boer and coworkers [90]. By accepting a reference from a BET fit to a standard system and assuming a density for the adsorbed film, one may convert n/rim to film thickness t. The characteristic isotherm for a given adsorbate may then be plotted as t versus P/P. For any new system, one reads t from the standard r-curve and n from the new isotherm, for various P/P values. De Boer and co-work-ers t values are given in Table XVII-4. A plot of t versus n should be linear if the experimental isotherm has the same shape as the reference characteristic isotherm, and the slope gives E ... 

The multilayer isotherms illustrated thus far have all been of a continuous appearance—it was such isotherms that the BET, FHH, and other equations treated. About 30 years ago, however, multilayer adsorption on smooth sur-... 

Brunauer (see Refs. 136-138) defended these defects as deliberate approximations needed to obtain a practical two-constant equation. The assumption of a constant heat of adsorption in the first layer represents a balance between the effects of surface heterogeneity and of lateral interaction, and the assumption of a constant instead of a decreasing heat of adsorption for the succeeding layers balances the overestimate of the entropy of adsorption. These comments do help to explain why the model works as well as it does. However, since these approximations are inherent in the treatment, one can see why the BET model does not lend itself readily to any detailed insight into the real physical nature of multilayers. In summary, the BET equation will undoubtedly maintain its usefulness in surface area determinations, and it does provide some physical information about the nature of the adsorbed film, but only at the level of approximation inherent in the model. Mainly, the c value provides an estimate of the first layer heat of adsorption, averaged over the region of fit. 

Adsorption isotherms in the micropore region may start off looking like one of the high BET c-value curves of Fig. XVII-10, but will then level off much like a Langmuir isotherm (Fig. XVII-3) as the pores fill and the surface area available for further adsorption greatly diminishes. The BET-type equation for adsorption limited to n layers (Eq. XVII-65) will sometimes fit this type of behavior. Currently, however, more use is made of the Dubinin-Raduschkevich or DR equation. Tliis is Eq. XVII-75, but now put in the form... 

Plot the data according to the BET equation and calculate Vm and c, and the specific surface area in square meters per gram. 

When plotted according to the linear form of the BET equation, data for the adsorption of N2 on Graphon at 77 K give an intercept of 0.004 and a slope of 1.7 (both in cubic centimeters STP per gram). Calculate E assuming a molecular area of 16 for N2. Calculate also the heat of adsorption for the first layer (the heat of condensation of N2 is 1.3 kcal/mol). Would your answer for Vm be much different if the intercept were taken to be zero (and the slope the same) Comment briefly on the practical significance of your conclusion. 

Consider the case of the BET equation with c = 1. Calculate for this case the heat of adsorption for the process ... 

An adsorption system follows Eq. XVII-79 in the form lnv = B-(l/n)lnln(P /P) with n - 2.75 and B = 3.2. Assuming now that you are presented with data that fall on the curve defined by this equation, calculate the corresponding BET vm and c values. 

We consider next perhaps the bet understood catalyzed reaction the oxidation of CO over group VIII metal catalysts. The reaction is an important environmental one since it involves the conversion of CO to CO2 in automobile catalytic converters. The mechanism is straightforward ... 

Another limitation of tire Langmuir model is that it does not account for multilayer adsorption. The Braunauer, Ennnett and Teller (BET) model is a refinement of Langmuir adsorption in which multiple layers of adsorbates are allowed [29, 31]. In the BET model, the particles in each layer act as the adsorption sites for the subsequent layers. There are many refinements to this approach, in which parameters such as sticking coefficient, activation energy, etc, are considered to be different for each layer. 

Another example of epitaxy is tin growdi on the (100) surfaces of InSb or CdTe a = 6.49 A) [14]. At room temperature, elemental tin is metallic and adopts a bet crystal structure ( white tin ) with a lattice constant of 5.83 A. However, upon deposition on either of the two above-mentioned surfaces, tin is transfonned into the diamond structure ( grey tin ) with a = 6.49 A and essentially no misfit at the interface. Furtliennore, since grey tin is a semiconductor, then a novel heterojunction material can be fabricated. It is evident that epitaxial growth can be exploited to synthesize materials with novel physical and chemical properties. 

---