Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Behavioral Studies General Comments

As a general comment about the dynamic mechanical relaxational behavior of this polymer, the results are consistent with dielectric data [210] and with the fact that no glass transition phenomenon is observed, at least in the range of temperature studied. This is striking in an amorphous polymer. It is likely that the residual part of the molecule mechanically active above the temperature of the ft relaxation is only a small one, and this is the reason for the low loss observed in the a zone. [Pg.146]

The general comment made here is that the use of synovial fluids — whether derived from human or animal sources and whether healthy or abnormal — is important in in vitro studies of synovial joint lubrication. The documented behavior of synovial fluid in producing low friction and wear with articular cartilage sets a reference standard and demonstrates that useful information can indeed come from in vitro tests. [Pg.887]

We conclude this section with a general comment on interstitial models. The study of such models is useful and quite rewarding in providing us insight into the possible mechanism by which water exhibits its anomalous behavior. One should be careful not to conclude that the numerical results obtained from the model are an indication of the extent of the reality of the model. It is possible, by a judicious choice of the molecular parameters, to obtain thermodynamic results which are in agreement with experimental values measured for real water. Such agreement can be achieved by quite different models. The important point is not the quantitative results of the model but the qualitative explanation that the model offers for the various properties of water. We shall use the same model in Sec. 3.6 to explain some aspects of aqueous solutions of simple solutes. [Pg.167]

To conclude, this sampling of the literature of risk perception, the comments of Covello, 1981 may be summarized. Surveys have been of small specialized groups - generally not representative of the population as a whole. There has been little attempt to analyze the effects of ethnicity, religion, sex, region age, occupation and other variables that may affect risk perception. People respond to surveys with the first thing that comes to mind and tend to stick to this answer. They provide an answer to any question asked even when they have no opinion, do not understand the question or have inconsistent beliefs. Surveys are influenced by the order of questions, speed of response, whether a verbal or numerical respon.se is required and by how the answer is posed. Few Studies have examined the relationships between perceptions of technological hazards and behavior which seems to be influenced by several factors such as positive identification with a leader, efficacy of social and action, physical proximity to arenas of social conflict. [Pg.13]

Finally, we comment on the difference between the self part and the full density autocorrelation function. The full density autocorreration function and the dynamical structure factor ire experimentally measured, while in the present MD simulation only the self pairt was studied. However, the difference between both correlation functions (dynamical structure factors) is considered to be rather small except that additional modes associated with sound modes appear in the full density autocorrelation. We have previously computed the full density autocorrelation via MD simulations for the same model as the present one, and found that the general behavior of the a relaxation was little changed. General trends of the relaxation are nearly the same for both full correlation and self part. In addition, from a point of numerical calculations, the self pMt is more easily obtained than the full autocorrelation the statistics of the data obtained from MD simulatons is much higher for the self part than for the full autocorrelation. [Pg.130]


See other pages where Behavioral Studies General Comments is mentioned: [Pg.124]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.116]   


SEARCH



Behavioral studies

Comment

General Behavior

General Comments

General Studies

© 2024 chempedia.info