Bayesian reasoning

G D Agostini. Bayesian reasoning in high energy physics Principles and applications. CERN Lectures, 1998. 

One need not enter into contested issues about individuation to see what is wrong with this argument. Nor does one need to call on Bayesian reasoning to be convinced that the many-universe hypothesis does not, of itself, explain why... 

Yang, Z.L., Bonsall. S. and Wang, J. (2008), Fuzzy Rule-Based Bayesian Reasoning Approach for Prioritization of Failures in FME A, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 517-528. 

Capture ontology generated outputs Call Bayesian Reasoning Mechanism Check for pattern number if (pattem number > 0) then do while not goal... 

Stipancic T, Jerbic B, Curkovic P (2011) A robot group control based on Bayesian reasoning. In Proceedings of the world congress on engineering 2011, WCE 2011. Lecture notes in engineering and computer science. London, UK, 6-8 July 2011, pp 1056-1060... 

Analysis functions can be mainly considered to be the backward Bayesian inference process. When the system reliability is assessed as lower than a threshold, in other words, when system degradation happens, analysis functions generate the analytic results based on Bayesian reasoning to indicate current healthy condition and reliability assessment at system level, function level and component level. The most important is that, based on the backward Bayesian inference, the analysis functions indicate the main cause(s) of low system reliability or system degradation and further provide optimized maintenance decisions. 

There has been a considerable interest in the modeling of user activity for the purpose of determining availability for notifications and communications [1,3]. Horvitz et al. [13, 15] approached this problem using Bayesian reasoning models that allowed prediction of user interruptability on the basis of a variety of measures of interactive behaviors. They created attention-based models based upon analysis of keyboard and mouse events during interactions with applications such as, for example, Microsoft Outlook. Horvitz et al. also measured the effect of interruptions by calculating the... 

Herzig, S.J.I., Paredis, C.J.J. Bayesian reasoning over models. In Workshop on Model-Driven Engineering, Verification, and Validation (2014). http //ceur-ws.org/Vol-1235/paper-09.pdf... 

Bayesian networks for multivariate reasoning about cause and effect within R D with a flow bottleneck model (Fig. 11.6) to help combine scientific and economic aspects of decision making. This model can, where research process decisions affect potential candidate value, further incorporate simple estimation of how the candidate value varies based on the target product profile. Factors such as ease of dosing in this profile can then be causally linked to the relevant predictors within the research process (e.g., bioavailability), to model the value of the predictive methods that might be used and to perform sensitivity analysis of how R D process choices affect the expected added... 

Within the multichannel Bayesian formalism of structure determination, it is indeed possible to make use ofMaxEnt distributions to model systems whose missing structure can be reasonably depicted as made of random independent scatterers. This requires that the structural information absent in the diffraction data be obtained from some other experimental or theoretical source. The known substructure can be described making use of a parametrised model. 

We begin with a model for the shape of the SSD. For the sake of argument, we will assume that the SSD of B is approximately normal. That is, the histogram of the LC50 values for pesticide B looks approximately like a normal density with mean pg and variance o. We may reasonably expect the SSD of A also to be normal with unknown mean Pa But the same variance, oi = a. Standard statistical theory tells us how to estimate p and oi from the few species that have been tested with A. But Bayesian statistics goes a bit further by telling us also how to use the information about pesticide B. 

Apart from this pedagogical aspect (cf Lee 1989, preface), there is a more technical reason to prefer the Bayesian approach to the confidence approach. The Bayesian approach is the more powerfnl one eventnally, for extending a model into directions necessary to deal with its weaknesses. These are various relaxations of distribntional assnmptions. The conceptnal device of an infinite repetition of samples, as in the freqnentist viewpoint, does not yield enongh power to accomplish these extensions. 

Howson C, Urbach P. 1989. Scientific reasoning. The Bayesian approach. La SaUe (fL) Open Court. 

Box and Meyer (1986, 1993) provided Bayesian methods for obtaining posterior probabilities that effects are active see Chapter 11, Section 2, for more details. There followed a flurry of papers proposing new frequentist methods, giving refinements of the methods, and making empirical comparisons of the many variations. Hamada and Balakrishnan (1998) provided an extensive review of these methods, including a Monte Carlo-based comparison of the operating characteristics of the methods that is, a comparison of the power of the methods for a variety of combinations of effect values (parameter configurations). They found that comparison of methods is difficult for various reasons. For example, some... 

Although both models could be valid theoretically, Model 18 does not constitute a significant benefit over Model 7 in terms of AIC (Akaike Criteria) and SBC (Schwarz s Bayesian Criteria). In principle, any model should be practical and as simple as possible. UM-203 has its target within the central compartment, i.e., the platelets. Therefore, one could visualize the compound distributing between two compartments within the blood, i.e., plasma and platelets. For this reason, Model 7 was selected for further analyses. The final parameters from Model 7 are listed in Table 3. 

To simulate the likelihood function for employing the Bayesian approach it was necessary to choose a reasonable range for the uniform prior distribution of the mean lifetime tx. A minimum of 0.1 seconds was safe, taking into account the time distribution of the 14 decay events. The maximal tx leaned upon the total effective production cross section of s.f. nuclei, which was measured in physical experiments. Obviously, 14 decays in 0.7 seconds with the upper tx should not correspond to many more events than was the observed total. 

---