Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Base rate variability test

MAMBAC offers two standard internal consistency tests, the nose count test and the base rate variability test. MAMBAC allows for two analyses per pair of indicators, which means that two indicators produce two plots, three indicators produce six plots, four indicators produce 12 plots, five indicators produce 20 plots, etc. Waller s MAMBAC does not do this automatically, and the investigator has to run each analysis independently. Ruscio s software, on the other hand, is fully automatic. [Pg.79]

Nose count and base rate variability consistency tests are possible with MAXSLOPE, although it is not yet clear how these tests behave when the underlying distributions are of the difficult kind. Luckily, MAXSLOPE puts less emphasis on internal consistency testing and stresses external consistency testing instead. MAXSLOPE is different from other taxometric algorithms and thus can provide a strong test of external consistency for other procedures. [Pg.83]

Lenzenweger (1999) performed MAXCOV using the three scales as taxon indicators. He used an interval size of. 50 SD and MRIN of 15. Two of the plots showed clear peaks, and one produced a cusp. The one incomplete peak was probably a consequence of the interval size being set too high, which allowed for only seven intervals on the input variable. A lower interval size would have produced a finer gradation and probably allowed the cusp to turn into a full peak. However, this may not have been possible due to the modest size of the sample. The base rates estimates were. 11,. 22, and. 13. The author did not report a base rate consistency test, but one can easily calculate the SD of the three estimates to be. 06, which is somewhat high but probably acceptable. [Pg.122]

As a result of this protocol, four indicators were dropped because in each case, they did not pass the first consistency test, that is, failed to discriminate adequately at all levels of the scale. Next, Tyrka et al. (1995) calculated the taxon base rate for each indicator using a hybrid of MAXCOV and Latent Class Analysis estimation procedures (for details see Golden, 1982) and adjusted the estimate for the true- and false-positive rates computed earlier. The average taxon base rate was. 49. The authors did not report a variability statistic, but a simple computation shows that SD of base rate estimates was. 04. [Pg.118]

Unfortunately, no consistency tests were reported in this study. Furthermore, instead of reporting the 28 individual base rate estimates, the authors reported an overall base rate estimate for each item, averaging over analyses in which the item was an output variable. This can be somewhat confusing because MAXCOV base rate estimates are associated with the input variable, not the output variable. The reason for this is MAXCOV base rate estimation is tied with locating the hitmax on the input indicator so that each base rate estimate is attached to a certain input indicator. This,... [Pg.120]

Selection of Alter media is based mainly on testing results on the material performance and filtration performance. In addition to retention of variable particles and appropriate flow rate, special require-... [Pg.1659]

DINAMIT tested the hypothesis was that prophylactic ICDs reduce all-cause mortality in survivors of a recent myocardial infarction (within 6-40 days). These high risk survivors were selected based on left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < 0.35) as well as depressed heart-rate variability or an elevated 24-h heart rate. The annual all-cause mortality rates (7.5% for the ICD and 6.9% for the control arms) were not different. While fewer patients in the ICD arm died an arrhythmic death, this was offset by more nonarrhythmic deaths (174). This very ill group was likely too iU to benefit from an ICD. Based on these data, prophylactic ICDs are not currently recommended in high-risk patients who recently had a myocardial infarction. [Pg.521]

Sweetness is often an important characteristic of sugar alcohols in food and pharmaceutical applications. The property of sweetness is measured in a variety of ways and has a corresponding variability in ratings (218). Based on one or more test methods, erythritol and xyfitol are similar to or sweeter than sucrose (218,219). Sorbitol is about 60% as sweet as sucrose, and mannitol, D-arabinitol, ribitol, maltitol, isomalt, and lactitol are generally comparable to sorbitol (see Sweeteners). [Pg.53]

Dissolution test data will be required in all cases (and for all strengths of product) for development and routine control and should be based on the most suitable discriminatory conditions. The method should discriminate between acceptable and unacceptable batches based on in vivo performance. Wherever possible Ph Eur test methods should be used (or alternatives justified). Test media and other conditions (e.g., flow through rate or rate of rotation) should be stated and justified. Aqueous media should be used where possible and sink conditions should be maintained. A small amount of surfactant may be added where necessary to control surface tension or for active ingredients of very low solubility. Buffer solutions should be used to span the physiologically relevant range—the current advice is over pH 1 6.8 or perhaps up to pH 8 if necessary. Ionic strength of media should be reported. The test procedure should employ six dosage forms (individually) with the mean data and a measure of variability reported. [Pg.655]


See other pages where Base rate variability test is mentioned: [Pg.47]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.1396]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.731]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.899]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.852]    [Pg.569]    [Pg.755]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.140]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.47 , Pg.48 ]




SEARCH



Base variable

Rate variables

Ratings tests

© 2024 chempedia.info