Atomic theory, simplified nature

The bond valence theory is a chemist s model of chemical structure. It gives a graphical picture of the chemical bmid based on traditional electron counting rules. It uses classical physics concepts because, since the atoms in compounds under ambient conditions are in their groimd state, quantum descriptions are in most cases not needed. The model is derived from a picture of the atom that is simple enough for an introductory course, but physically accurate enough to allow it to be used as the basis for introducing the full quantum treatment when this is required. The theory leads naturally into the more advanced quantum description that students will meet later, but it avoids the unphysical assumptions inherent in the simplified orbital and Lewis models often found in introductory texts. 

Because its base units directly underlie the quantum theory of electrons (i.e., the mass, charge, and angular momentum of the electron itself), the atomic units naturally simplify the fundamental Schrodinger equation for electronic interactions. (Indeed, with the choice me = e = h = 1, the Schrodinger equation reduces to pure numbers, and the solutions of this equation can be determined, once and for all, in a mathematical form that is independent of any subsequent re-measurement of e, me, and h in chosen practical units.) In contrast, textbooks commonly employ the Systeme International d Unites (SI), whose base units were originally chosen without reference to atomic phenomena ... 

It is worth noting at this point that the various scientific theories that quantitatively and mathematically formulate natural phenomena are in fact mathematical models of nature. Such, for example, are the kinetic theory of gases and rubber elasticity, Bohr s atomic model, molecular theories of polymer solutions, and even the equations of transport phenomena cited earlier in this chapter. Not unlike the engineering mathematical models, they contain simplifying assumptions. For example, the transport equations involve the assumption that matter can be viewed as a continuum and that even in fast, irreversible processes, local equilibrium can be achieved. The paramount difference between a mathematical model of a natural process and that of an engineering system is the required level of accuracy and, of course, the generality of the phenomena involved. 

Spectroscopy and the electron theory of valence provided valuable support for one another. Together, they took our understanding of the nature of chemical elements to a new level, where chemical behavior and chemical structure could both be interpreted in terms of the number and disposition of electrons in the atoms of any given element. At least, the simplified model of atomic orbitals brilliantly developed by Linus Pauling enabled him to explain and predict a great deal of chemistry, in terms of bonds and structures. 

The specific surface area of a ceramic powder can be measured by gas adsorption. Gas adsorption processes may be classified as physical or chemical, depending on the nature of atomic forces involved. Chemical adsorption (e.g., H2O and AI2O3) is caused by chemical reaction at the surface. Physical adsorption (e.g., N2 on AI2O3) is caused by molecular interaction forces and is important only at a temperature below the critical temperature of the gas. With physical adsorption the heat erf adsorption is on the same order of magnitude as that for liquefaction of the gas. Because the adsorption forces are weak and similar to liquefaction, the capillarity of the pore structure effects the adsorbed amount. The quantity of gas adsorbed in the monolayer allows the calculation of the specific surface area. The monolayer capacity (V ,) must be determined when a second layer is forming before the first layer is complete. Theories to describe the adsorption process are based on simplified models of gas adsorption and of the solid surface and pore structure. 

MO bond order One-half the difference between the numbers of electrons in bonding and antibonding MOs. (336) model (also theory) A simplified conceptual picture based on experiment that explains how an aspect of nature occurs. (9) molality (m) A concentration term expressed as number of moles of solute dissolved in 1000 g (I kg) of solvent. (403) molar heat capacity (C) The quantity of heat required to change the temperature of I mol of a substance by 1 K. (187) molar mass [M) (also gram-molecular weight) The mass of 1 mol of entities (atoms, molecules, or formula units) of a substance, in units ofg/mol. (72)... 

The problem of the searching for the optimal one-electron representation is one of the oldest in the theory of multielectron atoms. Three decades ago, Davidson had pointed the principal disadvantages of the traditional representation based on the self-consistent field approach and suggested the optimal natural orbitals representation. Nevertheless, there remain insurmountable calculational difficulties in the realization of the Davidson program (see, e.g. Ref. [12]). One of the simplified recipes represents, for example, the DPT method [18,19]. Unfortunately, this method does not provide a regular refinement procedure in the case of the complicated atom with few quasiparticles (electrons or vacancies above a core of the closed electronic shells). For simplicity, let us consider now the one-quasiparticle atomic system (i.e., atomic system with one electron or vacancy above a core of the closed electronic shells). The multi-quasiparticle case does not contain principally new moments. In the lowest second order of the QED PT for the A , there is the only one-quasiparticle Feynman diagram a (Fig. 12.1), contributing the ImAZ (the radiation decay width). 

Quantum mechanical calculations were also applied to evaluate the nature of the weak interactions between atoms. These weak interactions are responsible for the induced dipole cohesion of neutral atoms. It has been shown that the dispersion interaction energy of two atoms or ions with closed electronic configurations varied according to their polarizability and ionization energies. London used perturbation theory to obtain a simplified expression for the dispersion energy, Ejj, of two interacting species i and /, at separation r. 

A number of expressions for composition are found in the literature, the most popular being weight percent, atomic percent, and atom ratio. The first is useful only in engineering, the second if solution theory is used, while the last simplifies the writing of chemical equations and emphasizes the defect nature of the compounds. For these reasons, all reported compositions have been converted to atom ratio in the text. Conversion to atomic percent is easily made through the identity at.% = (C/M)/[l -h (C/M)]. 

Such comparisons apply in quantum mechanics, too. Recognizing the symmetry of an atomic or molecular system allows one to simplify the quantum mechanics, sometimes dramatically. We have already seen some aspects of symmetry odd and even functions, the spherical nature of the hydrogen atom s Is orbital, the cylindrical shape of H2 and H2. All these are applications of symmetry. In this chapter, we will develop a general understanding of symmetry using a mathematical tool called group theory. Then, we can see how symmetry applies to some aspects of quantum mechanics. 

---