Atomic mass variations

So what do we do if we need an atomic mass for an element of unknown or unspecified origin lUPAC has recommended values that apply to most samples found on Earth. The values are rounded so that atomic mass variations in samples found on Earth are plus or minus one in the last digit (just like accepted significant figure conventions). These values are adopted throughout all of the periodic tables in this book except the one shown here, which displays the upper and lower bound for those elements in which variation occurs. For further reading see lUPAC. Pure Appl. Chem. 2011,83(2), 359-396. 

For organometailic compounds, the situation becomes even more complicated because the presence of elements such as platinum, iron, and copper introduces more complex isotopic patterns. In a very general sense, for inorganic chemistry, as atomic number increases, the number of isotopes occurring naturally for any one element can increase considerably. An element of small atomic number, lithium, has only two natural isotopes, but tin has ten, xenon has nine, and mercury has seven isotopes. This general phenomenon should be approached with caution because, for example, yttrium of atomic mass 89 is monoisotopic, and iridium has just two natural isotopes at masses 191 and 193. Nevertheless, the occurrence and variation in patterns of multi-isotopic elements often make their mass spectrometric identification easy, as depicted for the cases of dimethylmercury and dimethylplatinum in Figure 47.4. 

Atomic masses calculated in this manner, using data obtained with a mass spectrometer can in principle be precise to seven or eight significant figures. The accuracy of tabulated atomic masses is limited mostly by variations in natural abundances. Sulfur is an interesting case in point. It consists largely of two isotopes, fiS and fgS. The abundance of sulfur-34 varies from about 4.18% in sulfur deposits in Texas and Louisiana to 4.34% in volcanic sulfur from Italy. This leads to an uncertainty of 0.006 amu in the atomic mass of sulfur. 

Different isotopes differ in their atomic masses. The intensities of the signals from different isotopic ions allow isotopic abundances to be determined with high accuracy. Mass spectrometry reveals that the isotopic abundances in elemental samples from different sources have slightly different values. Isotopic ratios vary because isotopes with different masses have slightly different properties for example, they move at slightly different speeds. These differences have tiny effects at the level of parts per ten thousand (0.0001). The effects are too small to appear as variations In the elemental molar masses. Nevertheless, high-precision mass spectrometry can measure relative abundances of isotopes to around 1 part in 100,000. 

The majority of crystallites observed were 3 or 4 nm In size. In Figure 3, a bar graph Illustrates the size range distribution and a comparison of mass variation for the 3 and 4 nm crystallite sizes. Although only thirty analyses were oiade, overall visual analysis confirmed the presence of hundreds of 3 to 4 nm platinum crystals with negligible numbers less or greater than these dimensions. It appears that slight variations In crystallite diameter and thickness have resulted In a fairly uniform number of platinum atoms per crystallite for the majority of the crystallites analyzed. In order to normalize count rates, the decrease In the field emission Intensity was taken Into account. 

The masses of isotopes can be measured with accuracies better than parts per billion (ppb), e.g., m40Ar = 39.9623831235 0.000000005 u. Unfortunately, determinations of abundance ratios are less accurate, causing errors of several parts per million (ppm) in relative atomic mass. The real limiting factor, however, comes from the variation of isotopic abundances from natural samples, e.g., in case of lead which is the final product of radioactive decay of uranium, the atomic weight varies by 500 ppm depending on the Pb/U ratios in the lead ore. [8]... 

Note The calculation of relative molecular mass, Mr, of organic molecules exceeding 2000 u is significantly influenced by the basis it is performed on. Both the atomic weights of the constituent elements and the natural variations in isotopic abundance contribute to the differences between monoisotopic- and relative atomic mass-based values. In addition, they tend to characteristically differ between major classes of biomolecules. This is primarily because of molar carbon content, e.g., the difference between polypeptides and nucleic acids is about 4 u at Mr = 25,000 u. Considering terrestrial sources alone, variations in the isotopic abundance of carbon lead to differences of about 10-25 ppm in Mr which is significant with respect to mass measurement accuracy in the region up to several 10 u. [41]... 

Table A. 1 comprises the stable elements from hydrogen to bismuth with the radioactive elements technetium and promethium omitted. Natural variations in isotopic composition of some elements such as carbon or lead do not allow for more accurate values, a fact also reflected in the accuracy of their relative atomic mass. However, exact masses of the isotopes are not affected by varying abundances. The isotopic masses listed may differ up to some 10 u in other publications.

It is critical when performing quantitative GC/MS procedures that appropriate internal standards are employed to account for variations in extraction efficiency, derivatization, injection volume, and matrix effects. For isotope dilution (ID) GC/MS analyses, it is crucial to select an appropriate internal standard. Ideally, the internal standard should have the same physical and chemical properties as the analyte of interest, but will be separated by mass. The best internal standards are nonradioactive stable isotopic analogs of the compounds of interest, differing by at least 3, and preferably by 4 or 5, atomic mass units. The only property that distinguishes the analyte from the internal standard in ID is a very small difference in mass, which is readily discerned by the mass spectrometer. Isotopic dilution procedures are among the most accurate and precise quantitative methods available to analytical chemists. It cannot be emphasized too strongly that internal standards of the same basic structure compensate for matrix effects in MS. Therefore, in the ID method, there is an absolute reference (i.e., the response factors of the analyte and the internal standard are considered to be identical Pickup and McPherson, 1976). 

Elements are defined by the number of protons in the nucleus of each atom. The number of nuclear protons is equal to the number of electrons orbiting the nucleus. The nucleus of carbon contains six protons. This value is known as the atomic number for carbon. In nature, carbon occurs largely in a form in which the nucleus also contains six neutrons. The atomic mass of carbon is defined as the sum of the number of protons pins neutrons. Consequently, this form of carbon is called carbon-12, or About 98.9% of carbon in nature is Most of the rest is carbon-13, and contains seven neutrons in the nncleus. Smaller amounts of carbon occur that contain five or eight neutrons. These are known, respectively, as carbon-11, and carbon-14, These variations on the theme of carbon are called isotopes. Carbon-11 and carbon-14 are radioactive and decay spontaneously carbon-12 and carbon-13 are stable. 

The values of the total energy of atomic systems is calculated then integrating the quantum mechanical energy density for rsemi classical one for rc> r> fQ. Our first calculation was performed for single positive ions, neglecting all exchange effects (even the non-relativistic ones) in order to compare our procedure to the results of Ref. [15] where they were not considered, as a test of the validity of the mass variation correction in differences are about 1 % for Z = 55, 2% for... 

What is the uncertainty in the molecular mass of 02 On the inside cover of this book, we find that the atomic mass of oxygen is 15.9994 0.000 3g/mol. The uncertainty is not mainly from random error in measuring the atomic mass. The uncertainty is predominantly from isotopic variation in samples of oxygen from different sources. That is, oxygen from one source could have a mean atomic mass of 15.999 1 and oxygen from another source could have an atomic mass of 15.999 7. The atomic mass of oxygen in a particular lot of reagent has a systematic uncertainty. It could be relatively constant at 15.999 7 or 15.999 1, or any value in between, with only a small random variation around the mean value. 

Sulfur is one of the few exceptions to the constancy of isotopic proportions, in that there is sufficient variation, dependent upon the source of the sulfur, to cause a variation in its atomic mass by approximately 0.01%. For normal stoichiometric calculations, however, this small variation is unimportant. 

The isotopes composition of Pb (and thus its atomic mass) varies detectably according to the source, and such variations have been used to estimate the age of rocks and of the Earth. 

The variations in isotopic composition of many elements in samples of different origin limit the precision to which a relative atomic mass can be given. The standard atomic weights revised biennially by the IUPAC Commission on Atomic Weights and Isotopic Abundances are meant to be applicable for normal materials. This means that to a high level of confidence the relative atomic mass of an element in any normal sample will be within the uncertainty limits of the tabulated value. By normal it is meant here that the material is a reasonably possible source of the element or its compounds in commerce for industry and science and that it has not been subject to significant modification of isotopic composition within a geologically brief period [43]. This, of course, excludes materials studied themselves for very anomalous isotopic composition. 

The relative atomic masses of many elements depend on the origin and treatment of the materials [45]. The notes to this table explain the types of variation to be expected for individual elements. When used with due regard to the notes the values are considered reliable to the figure given in parentheses being applicable to the last digit. For elements without a characteristic terrestrial isotopic composition no standard atomic weight is recommended. The atomic mass of its most stable isotope can be found in table 6.3. 

It was noticed that some physical properties of the elements such as melting point rise and fall in a regular way as RAM increases. Such a variation is called a periodic variation, because it varies periodically. The first chemist to try plotting a graph of property against RAM, about a hundred and forty years ago, Lothar Meyer, plotted the atomic volume of elements, Le. atomic mass/density, against RAM, and he noticed a periodic pattern in the graph which he linked to the properties of the elements. 

The number of significant figures in a table of chemical or natural relative atomic masses (see the inside back cover of this book) is limited not only by the accuracy of the mass spectrometric data but also by any variability in the natural abundances of the isotopes. If lead from one mine has a relative atomic mass of 207.18 and lead from another has a mass of 207.23, there is no way a result more precise than 207.2 can be obtained. In fact, geochemists are now able to use small variations in the isotopic abundance ratio as a thermometer to deduce... 

Figure 26-10 Variation in nuclear binding energy unth atomic mass. The most stable nucleus is 26Fc> with a binding energy of 8.80 MeV per nucleon.

---