Asymmetric catalysis classes

Bisphosphinamidites which are supported by an axially chiral framework are another important class of ligands. Although reported as early as 1980 [50], no reports on the use of binaphthyl-based bisphosphinamidite in asymmetric catalysis were published during the decade thereafter. As described above, the selectivity and substrate generality in these early attempts were very limited in scope. In 1998, we unveiled that by partially hydrogenating BINAM to H8-BINAM and... 

G. Helmchen, A. Pfaltz, Phosphinooxazolines - A New Class of Versatile, Modular RN-Ligands for Asymmetric Catalysis, Acc Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 336-345. 

There is little doubt that the discovery of a class of chiral catalysts by Trost, represented by 102 in Scheme 15, constitutes one of the most important recent developments in asymmetric catalysis. The total synthesis of aflatoxin B, depicted in Scheme 15,... 

A number of groups have reported the preparation and in situ application of several types of dendrimers with chiral auxiliaries at their periphery in asymmetric catalysis. These chiral dendrimer ligands can be subdivided into three different classes based on the specific position of the chiral auxiliary in the dendrimer structure. The chiral positions may be located at, (1) the periphery, (2) the dendritic core (in the case of a dendron), or (3) throughout the structure. An example of the first class was reported by Meijer et al. [22] who prepared different generations of polypropylene imine) dendrimers which were substituted at the periphery of the dendrimer with chiral aminoalcohols. These surface functionalities act as chiral ligand sites from which chiral alkylzinc aminoalcoholate catalysts can be generated in situ at the dendrimer periphery. These dendrimer systems were tested as catalyst precursors in the catalytic 1,2-addition of diethylzinc to benzaldehyde (see e.g. 13, Scheme 14). 

Bifunctional catalysts have proven to be very powerful in asymmetric organic transformations [3], It is proposed that these chiral catalysts possess both Brpnsted base and acid character allowing for activation of both electrophile and nucleophile for enantioselective carbon-carbon bond formation [89], Pioneers Jacobsen, Takemoto, Johnston, Li, Wang and Tsogoeva have illustrated the synthetic utility of the bifunctional catalysts in various organic transformations with a class of cyclohexane-diamine derived catalysts (Fig. 6). In general, these catalysts contain a Brpnsted basic tertiary nitrogen, which activates the substrate for asymmetric catalysis, in conjunction with a Brpnsted acid moiety, such as urea or pyridinium proton. 

Abstract The term Lewis acid catalysts generally refers to metal salts like aluminium chloride, titanium chloride and zinc chloride. Their application in asymmetric catalysis can be achieved by the addition of enantiopure ligands to these salts. However, not only metal centers can function as Lewis acids. Compounds containing carbenium, silyl or phosphonium cations display Lewis acid catalytic activity. In addition, hypervalent compounds based on phosphorus and silicon, inherit Lewis acidity. Furthermore, ionic liquids, organic salts with a melting point below 100 °C, have revealed the ability to catalyze a range of reactions either in substoichiometric amount or, if used as the reaction medium, in stoichiometric or even larger quantities. The ionic liquids can often be efficiently recovered. The catalytic activity of the ionic liquid is explained by the Lewis acidic nature of then-cations. This review covers the survey of known classes of metal-free Lewis acids and their application in catalysis. 

In 2008, the same group employed chiral dicarboxylic acid (R)-5 (5 mol%, R = 4- Bu-2,6-Me2-CgHj) as the catalyst in the asymmetric addition of aldehyde N,N-dialkylhydrazones 81 to aromatic iV-Boc-imines 11 in the presence of 4 A molecular sieves to provide a-amino hydrazones 176, valuable precursors of a-amino ketones, in good yields with excellent enantioselectivities (35-89%, 84-99% ee) (Scheme 74) [93], Aldehyde hydrazones are known as a class of acyl anion equivalents due to their aza-enamine structure. Their application in the field of asymmetric catalysis has been limited to the use of formaldehyde hydrazones (Scheme 30). Remarkably, the dicarboxylic acid-catalyzed method applied not only to formaldehyde hydrazone 81a (R = H) but also allowed for the use of various aryl-aldehyde hydrazones 81b (R = Ar) under shghtly modified conditions. Prior to this... 

Asymmetric synthesis starts with a prochiral compound. This is a compound which is not chiral, but can be converted into a chiral compound by a chiral (bio) catalyst. Subsequently, two types of prochiral compounds can be distinguished The first one has a stereoheterotopic face (which usually is a double bond) to which an addition reaction takes place. An example is the conversion of the prochiral compound propene into 1,2-epoxypropane (which has two enantiomers, of which one may be preferentially formed using an enantioselective catalyst). The second type of prochiral compound has two so-called enantiotopic atoms or groups. If one of these is converted, the compound becomes chiral. Meso-compounds belong to this class. Figure 10.5 and 10.6 show some examples of the different types of asymmetric catalysis with prochiral compounds. 

The Evans Cu(II)- and Sn(II)-catalyzed processes are unique in their ability to mediate aldol additions to pyruvate. Thus, the process provides convenient access to tertiary a-hydroxy esters, a class of chiral compounds not otherwise readily accessed with known methods in asymmetric catalysis. The process has been extended further to include a-dike-tone 101 (Eqs. 8B2.22 and 8B2.23). It is remarkable that the Cu(II) and Sn(II) complexes display enzyme-like group selectivity, as the complexes can differentiate between ethyl and methyl groups in the addition of thiopropionate-derived Z-silyl ketene acetal to 101. As discussed above, either syn or anti diastereomers may be prepared by selection of the Cu(II) or Sn(II) catalyst, respectively. 

Many of the major developments in hydrogenation chemistry in the last decade have been in the area of asymmetric catalysis, and the level of coverage in this review will reflect this important area. In preparing this review it became apparent that many specific catalytic systems may be employed for the reductions of several different classes of double-bonded substrate. To afford maximum utility to the reader as a reference text, the contents have been arranged by type of double bond reduced. 

The oxidative imination of sulfides and sulfoxides via nitrene transfer processes leads to N-substituted sulfilimines and sulfoximines. This reaction is interesting as chiral sulfoximines are efficient chiral auxiliaries in asymmetric synthesis, a promising class of chiral ligands for asymmetric catalysis and key intermediates in the synthesis of pseudopeptides [169]. However, very few examples of such iron-catalyzed transformations have been described. 

Most catalysts that have been developed for asymmetric catalysis contain chiral C2-symmetric bisphosphines.7 The development of chiral ferrocenylphosphines ventures away from this conventional wisdom. Chirality in this class of ligands can result from planar chirality due to 1,2-unsymmetrically ferrocene structure as well as from various chiral substituents. Two classes of ferrocenylbisphosphines exist two phosphino groups substituted at the l,l -position about the ferrocene backbone (51) and both phosphino groups contained within a single cyclopentadienyl (Cp) ring of ferrocene (4).9... 

While Quinap (95) is an excellent and versatile ligand from which numerous developments in asymmetric catalysis have benefited,49 its synthesis is cumbersome, and hence its price remains high (R enantiomer 100 mg, 337 CHF). Carreira et al. showed that the synthetically readily accessible PEMAP ligand class is as versatile as... 

Over the past fifteen years there has been a rapid expansion of the field of asymmetric catalysis with approximately twenty classes of reactions now having been achieved with high (> 70% e.e.) optical purity. Some representative examples follow. 

This collection begins with a series of three procedures illustrating important new methods for preparation of enantiomerically pure substances via asymmetric catalysis. The preparation of 3-[(1S)-1,2-DIHYDROXYETHYL]-1,5-DIHYDRO-3H-2.4-BENZODIOXEPINE describes, in detail, the use of dihydroquinidine 9-0-(9 -phenanthryl) ether as a chiral ligand in the asymmetric dihydroxylation reaction which is broadly applicable for the preparation of chiral dlols from monosubstituted olefins. The product, an acetal of (S)-glyceralcfehyde, is itself a potentially valuable synthetic intermediate. The assembly of a chiral rhodium catalyst from methyl 2-pyrrolidone 5(R)-carboxylate and its use in the intramolecular asymmetric cyclopropanation of an allyl diazoacetate is illustrated in the preparation of (1R.5S)-()-6,6-DIMETHYL-3-OXABICYCLO[3.1. OJHEXAN-2-ONE. Another important general method for asymmetric synthesis involves the desymmetrization of bifunctional meso compounds as is described for the enantioselective enzymatic hydrolysis of cis-3,5-diacetoxycyclopentene to (1R,4S)-(+)-4-HYDROXY-2-CYCLOPENTENYL ACETATE. This intermediate is especially valuable as a precursor of both antipodes (4R) (+)- and (4S)-(-)-tert-BUTYLDIMETHYLSILOXY-2-CYCLOPENTEN-1-ONE, important intermediates in the synthesis of enantiomerically pure prostanoid derivatives and other classes of natural substances, whose preparation is detailed in accompanying procedures. 

---