Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Armed methodology

New methods for assessing events, such as the Event Risk Classification (ERC) element of the ARMS methodology (ARMS, 2010) have moved towards a focus on effectiveness of the preventative and recovery barriers in relation to an undesirable event. This helps focus the organization on the positive measures it can take to promote safety. A similar concept is needed to support human performance through the identification, measurement and management of the relevant organizational factors. [Pg.1099]

He then joined the Central Research Establishment of the Home Office Forensic Science Service (as it then was) at Aldermaston where he developed thermogravimetry-MS, pyrolysis-MS, GC-MS and LC-MS methodologies for the identification of analytes associated with crime investigations. It was here that his interest in LC-MS began with the use of an early moving-belt interface. This interest continued during periods of employment with two manufacturers of LC-MS equipment, namely Kratos and subsequently Interion, the UK arm of the Vestec Corporation of Houston, Texas, the company set up by Marvin Vestal, the primary developer of the thermospray LC-MS interface. [Pg.18]

He also prepared a poly(styrene-g-styrene) polymer by this technique [114], The lack of crosslinking in these systems is indeed proof of the control achieved with this technique. An eight-arm star polystyrene has also been prepared starting from a calixarene derivative under ATRP conditions [115]. On the other hand, Sawamoto and his coworkers used multifunctional chloroacetate initiator sites and mediation with Ru2+ complexes for the living free-radical polymerization of star poly(methylmethacrylate) [116,117]. More recent work by Hedrick et al. [84] has demonstrated major progress in the use of dendritic initiators [98] in combination with ATRP and other methodologies to produce a variety of structure controlled, starlike poly(methylmethacrylate). [Pg.86]

Fig. 2.8 Broad (A) and detailed (B) views of a gel and sample preparation robot (WARPA7) for the GPC spin column/ESI-MS methodology. For panel (A) note the centrifuge (right end of table), shaker, sample reservoirs and robot arm with a 96-well pipettor. Reprinted from reference [15] with permission from the American Chemical Society. Fig. 2.8 Broad (A) and detailed (B) views of a gel and sample preparation robot (WARPA7) for the GPC spin column/ESI-MS methodology. For panel (A) note the centrifuge (right end of table), shaker, sample reservoirs and robot arm with a 96-well pipettor. Reprinted from reference [15] with permission from the American Chemical Society.
Figure 16 shows the viscometer and DRI traces of another star-branched polystyrene. This sample contained about 12% of the starting linear arm precursor which eluted at retention volume ca. 52 ml. The kinetic molecular weight of the linear precursor was 260,000. The results obtained for the individual peak through the SEC/Viscosity methodology are summarized in Table 7. It is seen that the measured of the linear arm is very closed to the kinetic value. The average functionality of this star polymer is calculated to be f = 10. [Pg.149]

The overall methodology of IB polymerization by the two-stage procedure has been followed (see Sect. 2.2.1). The terminal allyl-functionahzation of the hving PIB arms was carried out by adapting a procedure developed in these laboratories [63]. Allyltrimethylsilane (ATMS) ( 100-fold excess relative to the PIB chain end) was added when IB conversion has reached 95%. After 60 min the polymerization mixture was poured into an excess of chilled methanol, the product separated, redissolved in hexanes, washed with water and methanol, and finally reprecipitated into methanol. [Pg.6]

The strategy involved initiation of St polymerization by the living PIB arms of octa-arm stars. Scheme 7 illustrates the key steps and structures. The overall methodology of living IB polymerization by the two-stage procedure has been followed (see Sect. 4.1). Briefly, stars with predetermined arm molecular weights were prepared by the use of 1, in conjunction with BClj-TiC coinitiators used in two stages, then St was added to obtain the star blocks. [Pg.22]

Recent examples of this kind of methodology can be found, for example, in the work of Rebek et al. [10] The catalyst used is a cavitand armed with a Zn salen-type complex (Figure 1.2). The cavitand adopts a vase-like conformation that is stabilized by a seam of hydrogen bonds provided by the six secondary amides. The structure of the catalyst permits a slow dynamic exchange between free and bound guest (reactant) on the H NMR time-scale that is controlled by the folding and unfolding of the cavitand. [Pg.4]

It is difficult to lay down Arm standards of what is an acceptable uncertainty in a quantum chemical result, since this can vary considerably from case to case. It is part of. the quantum chemist s job to decide how accurately a given result must be obtained for his/her purposes, as we shall discuss in this course. However, the accuracy that can be achieved in principle is limited by several fundamental approximations that are made in deriving conventional quantum chemical methodology, and we begin by considering these approximations. [Pg.328]

This example of using a hierarchical multiscale modeling methodology for redesign of the Corvette cradle shows that not only can the multiscale modeling be used for monotonic considerations like the control arm, but can be used for fatigue analysis as well. [Pg.121]

Affinity chromatography combines the analytical and chemical capacities of chemically bonded stationary phases and immobilized enzymes. Technology and methodology of both techniques are joined in the development of affinity stationary phases. Since steric requirements are even more determining than in simple immobilized enzyme systems, spacer molecules have great importance in these modifications. Commonly used spacer arms are summarized in figure 8.3. [Pg.167]

Star polymers of chemically different arms are usually called miktoarm stars. Although there are several individual methods for the synthesis of miktoarm stars four general methodologies have been developed. Three of them are based on anionic polymerization and the fourth on cationic polymerization. In all of them the use of appropriate linking agents is necessary. [Pg.78]


See other pages where Armed methodology is mentioned: [Pg.237]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.648]    [Pg.650]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.720]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.42]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.246 ]




SEARCH



Arm-First Convergent Iterative Methodology

Arm-First Divergent Iterative Methodology

© 2024 chempedia.info