Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Argument building

So far there have not been any restrictions on the MOs used to build the determinantal trial wave function. The Slater determinant has been written in terms of spinorbitals, eq. (3.20), being products of a spatial orbital times a spin function (a or /3). If there are no restrictions on the form of the spatial orbitals, the trial function is an Unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) wave function. The term Different Orbitals for Different Spins (DODS) is also sometimes used. If the interest is in systems with an even number of electrons and a singlet type of wave function (a closed shell system), the restriction that each spatial orbital should have two electrons, one with a and one with /3 spin, is normally made. Such wave functions are known as Restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF). Open-shell systems may also be described by restricted type wave functions, where the spatial part of the doubly occupied orbitals is forced to be the same this is known as Restricted Open-shell Hartree-Fock (ROHF). For open-shell species a UHF treatment leads to well-defined orbital energies, which may be interpreted as ionization potentials. Section 3.4. For an ROHF wave function it is not possible to chose a unitary transformation which makes the matrix of Lagrange multipliers in eq. (3.40) diagonal, and orbital energies from an ROHF wave function are consequently not uniquely defined, and cannot be equated to ionization potentials by a Koopman type argument. [Pg.70]

These arguments go hand in hand with Extended Hiickel Theory (EHT), both being based on overlap (symmetry) considerations. In fact, an EHT calculation will provide almost exactly the same results as a skilful use of the qualitative MO building scheme we have provided in this section. [Pg.8]

The exact location of a laboratory within a building or a complex of buildings is often the result of a grand compromise. Sometimes the laboratory planner is presented with a location and must simply make the best of it. If the location is poor, he will then have to use his best persuasive powers to bring about a change. What arguments are effective against a poor location If insufficient space is the problem, a careful estimate of space re-... [Pg.13]

The laboratory area had no ventilation, and the system used elsewhere in the building was unable to handle the extra load. As a result, a separate system had to be installed. At the laboratory operator s insistence, this was to be a system -with no recirculation of ah . There was considerable resistance from management due to the higher cost for both installation and operation. To make matters more difficult, the heating engineer had never seen a need for such a system on previous jobs. One argument finally settled the situation. It was pointed out that fragrance evaluations would often have to be performed as part of product evaluation. This would be difficult if much of the air were recirculated. [Pg.145]

A for building up arguments and 0 for building up functions on the outside. We must not only keep track of the number of steps and store the values for the next cycle in the v variables but must also keep track of which equation is currently acting on u, which equation is acting on y and which equation will act on v when we restart. We keep track of this information mnemonically in the addresses. Thus address (R,k) will mean restart with equation k (the equation for F ) and (i,j,k) means equation is acting on y, equation F. on u and equation will act on v when we restart. [Pg.244]

These electroactive paramagnetic units are then the building blocks of edifices in which a synergy between magnetism and electrical conductivity is established. Several arguments plead in favor of this so-called through bond strategy (Fig. 4) ... [Pg.59]

Blavatsky s main polemical purpose in Isis Unveiled was to undermine the materialist nature of Darwinian evolution and to build a spiritual system based upon an evolutionary theory revamped to include the life force and spiritual goals. She defined the terms of her argument by articulating an emana-tionist perspective against an orthodox evolutionist interpretation ... [Pg.84]

PVC still faces environmental pressure from two directions there is hostility in the use of PVC in children s toys using the phthalate argument and building a new PVC complex faces severe regulatory pressure-witness the experience of ShinTech in the USA. [Pg.29]

An explosion demolishing an empty building was dubiously attributed to ignition of methane evolved from bat droppings [1]. There was much argument as to the probability of this [2], the eventual conclusion being that sewer gas from a septic tank was responsible. [Pg.73]

Inductively organized paragraphs begin with the specifics and lead to a general idea. That s why the topic sentence in this type of paragraph comes last—it expresses the conclusion or argument that s been proven by the build up of evidence. For example ... [Pg.79]

It may be concluded from these various arguments that the random walk concept will not in itself give rise to an optimum partition coefficient for biological effect, except in the early stages of the build up to the steady state. A maximal internal availance at an optimal value of P only arises when uptake competes with chemical decay or an excretion process with a different permeability relationship. The explanation of an optimum P value is more likely to involve effects on the form of the pulse of toxicant reaching the site of action, which result in the effect of the chemical transferred, rather than the availance, being greatest at a particular polarity. [Pg.193]

Just as you learned the value of a logical argument supported by emotional conviction and based upon facts and hard evidence, It Is equally Important tor you to ditferentlate fact from opinion, especially In fhe books and material that you read. Remember, your paper will be supported by tacts, not opinions. How do you gather as many tacts as possible and learn to distinguish them from opinions and an author s personal bias This chapter will help you become both a critical reader (as you learn to evaluate your own sources) and a critical writer (as your Influence your reader and build your case through the steady accumulation ot tacts). [Pg.87]

How do you know if this statement is true The author does not state it as fact and does not give the reader any additional sources to corroborate its accuracy. Did it happen or not Is it merely the author s own personal opinion or bias Just as you have learned to build your argument carefully and support your conclusions with facts, the same holds true for the works you are consulting. Remember, all authors have feelings and opinions, and almost all authors want you to be persuaded by their work otherwise, why would they bother writing books However, beware of those writers who try to present their opinions and biases as facts. If a book or work does not provide you with specific references in order to check the accuracy of its information do not use the material as factual evidence. Writers should try to clarify a reader s feelings, not shape or distort them. [Pg.89]

An analysis of the stmcture of the electron correlation terms in which the reference was the antisymmetrized products of FCI -RDM elements was reported in [12], The advantage of using correlated lower order matrices for building a high order reference matrix is that in an iterative process the reference is renewed in a natural way at each iteration. However, if the purpose is to analyse the structure of the electron correlation terms in an absolute manner that is, with respect to a fixed reference with no correlation, then the Hartree Fock p-RDM"s are the apropriate references. An important argument supporting this choice is that these p-RDM s are well behaved A-representable matrices and, moreover, (as has been discussed in [15]) the set of 1-, 2-, and 3-Hartree Fock-RDM constitute a solution of the 1 -CSE. [Pg.8]


See other pages where Argument building is mentioned: [Pg.442]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.708]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.625]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.70]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.87 ]




SEARCH



Argument

© 2024 chempedia.info