Analyte resolution between

Develop an analytical separation which gives the best possible resolution between the critical solutes. 

The HPLC elution pattern is affected to some extent by the pH of the mobile phase. Moderate pH adjustment to optimize the resolution between EMA and MEMA may be performed. Retention time can be affected greatly by the history of the HPLC column and also the buffer/methanol ratio. The mobile phase ratio should be adjusted to provide adequate separation and retention. Control and fortified samples should be run in the same analytical set with treated samples. 

If an internal standard is used, the minimum acceptable resolution between the internal standard and one or more active ingredient should be specified. If the analytical procedure is used to control the level of impurities, the minimum resolution between the active ingredient and the closest eluting impurity, or the two peaks eluting closest to each other, should be given. 

A second way to improve resolution is the modification of mobility by complexation of the analyte. Many buffers for analysis of cations use HIBA or 18-crown-6 to improve the resolution between sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, etc. as well as some aliphatic amines. By diluting an existing validated buffer, one can change the concentration of the complexation agent and thus also the selectivity of the system. 

As column temperature increases the degree of resolution between two components decreases because the degree of interaction with the stationary phase is reduced as the vapour pressure of the analytes increases. Lower temperatures produce better resolution. 

The greater the volume of stationary phase the more a solute will partition into it. If the film thickness or loading of stationary phase doubles then in theory the retention of an analyte should double. Thus thicker films are used for very volatile materials to increase their retention time and to increase resolution between analytes without increasing the column length. 

Consider an HPLC method for the separation of 11 priority pollutant phenols using an isocratic system. The aqueous mobile phase contains acetic acid, methanol and citric acid. From preliminary studies, it was established that the mobile phase composition was critical to ensure maximum resolution and to minimise tailing. The overall response factor, CRF, was measured by summing the individual resolutions between pairs of peaks. Hence, the CRF will increase as analytical performance improves. 

The addition of modifiers into the aqueous phase also affects selectivity. Cyclodextrins can be used in conjunction with the MECC buffer to provide selectivity for very hydrophobic analytes that would otherwise be almost totally incorporated into the micellar phase. In addition, they can be used for enantiomeric separations because of the chirality of the cyclodextrins themselves. The resolution between very hydrophobic compounds can also be improved by the addition of high concentrations of urea to the MECC buffer, which increases the solubility of hydrophobic compounds in water and breaks down hydrogen bonds in the aqueous phase. The addition of low concentrations (<20% v/v) of organic solvents, such as acetonitrile or 2-propanol, reduces the EOF and thereby expands the migration time window. Higher concentrations, however, can break down the micellar structure, so care should be taken. Finally, salts of certain metals, such as magnesium, zinc, or copper(II), can be added to enhance resolution of nucleotides. An optimization scheme for MECC separations is shown in Figure 5.9. 

Despite the overall good performance of SIL internal standards, one must not take it for granted due to the complexity of biological samples, particularly when deuterated internal standards are used. Deuteration could cause differences in hydrophobicity, reaction rates, and noncovalent interactions [31, 32], It is usually observed that a deuterated internal standard elutes slightly earlier than the analyte does in reversed-phase LC. This is even more pronounced with extensive deuteration and long retention time. Sometimes, base-line resolution between an analyte and its deuterated internal standard could be achieved. For example, when D[0 internal standards were used and the retention time was longer than 15 min, pibutidine metabolites were completed separated from their deuterated internal standards (Fig. 5 [33]). 

To perform qualitative and quantitative analyses correctly, it is necessary to fully separate the peaks of interest in the chromatogram. The goodness of separation is referred to as the resolution between two peaks and is defined as the distance between peak centers (A V) compared with the average width of the two peaks UWa + WB), as shown in Figure 1-4. Also included in Figure 1-4 is the analytical expression of the calculation. Generally, for good qualitative and quantitative analysis, a resolution of 1.0 or... 

Achievement of good resolution between analytes in complex chromatogram is the main goal in HPLC method development. Optimal resolution could be achieved by optimization of system efficiency, or selectivity (or... 

Snyder s thorough model [1-5] of gradient elution provides an extremely convenient means to achieve the objectives outlined above. The model uses the general resolution equation for isocratic chromatography in terms adapted to gradient elution. This equation defines resolution between two closely resolved analytes in gradient RP-HPLC as a function of mean column efficiency N, mean selectivity a, and the effective retention factor Aavc experienced by the compounds during the elution process j 1-3,5). 

As the solvents used will affect both the capacity factors and the selectivity of the system, the mobile phase is selected on its ability to elute the solutes in an acceptably short time with a reasonable resolution between each one. The choice of mobile phase components may also be influenced by the desire to suppress the ionisation of one or more of the analytes or to reduce peak tailing. These considerations, whilst very important are generally viewed separately from the factors which affect the k and a values. 

Asymmetric peaks can have a number of causes overloading, insufficient resolution between analyte peaks, unwanted interactions between the analytes and the stationary phase, e.g., residual silanol groups, voids in the column packing, and external peak broadening. 

---