Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Aluminum standard electrode potential

Solution Potential. The standard electrode potential of aluminum (A1 + 3e) is —1.66 V on the standard hydrogen scale and —1.99 V... [Pg.94]

It is noteworthy that solubility of the formed metal alkoxide is in many cases even more important for the reaction than the values of the metal standard electrode potentials or the mobility of protons of the alcohol. The following examples illustrate this statement. Despite higher acidity of MeOH in comparison with EtOH(pK= 15.5 and 16, respectively), the insoluble Ca(OMe)2 is formed very slowly in comparison with the soluble derivatives Ca(OEt)2 or Mg(OMe)2 (both latter compounds crystallize from solutions as solvates) [1646]. Aluminum readily reacts with PrOH with the formation of the highly soluble Al(OPrf)3 even in the absence of the catalyst (pK ROH = 18, E°AP7Al,ld = -1.66 V). On the other hand, polymeric Al(OMe)3 and Al(OEt)3 are formed only on prolonged refluxing of the metal with alcohols in xylene (140°C) in the presence of HgCl2 and I2 [1301]. [Pg.13]

Because of its very negative standard electrode potential of — 1.7 Kh. aliuninum cannot be deposited from aqueous solutions. Therefore only molten salt and water-free inorganic or organic electrolyte systems are eligible for electrolytic deposition of aluminum. Only through the development of such nonaqueous systems [53, 54, 118, 217, 221] did it become possible to electrodeposit aluminum with the desired quality and properties. [Pg.167]

Galvanized steel is a common example of galvanic coupling where steel (Fe), with a standard electrode potential of —0.440 V vs. SHE, is cathodicaUy protected by zinc, which has a more active standard electrode potential of —0.763 V. Obviously, zinc is not a corrosion-resistant metal and cannot be classified as a barrier coating. It protects steel from corrosion through its sacrificial properties. Because zinc is less noble than iron in terms of the standard electrode potentials, it acts as an anode. The sacrificial anode (zinc) is continuously consumed by anodic dissolution reaction and protects the underlying metal (iron in steel) from corrosion. In practice, sacrificial anodes are comprised of zinc, magnesium alloys, or aluminum. [Pg.241]

The electrode potential of all metals is compared with the standard hydrogen electrode and it is called the standard electrode potential ( °). Between two metals, such as zinc and aluminum, aluminum is more active than zinc [JS = —1.66 V, — —0.763V]. A metal with a more negative potential has a higher tendency to corrode (dissolve) than a metal with a less negative potential, although kinetic factors may intervene. [Pg.40]

In general, the higher the oxidation potential the lesser the tendency to corrode. However, some metals corrode less than other metal with higher redox potential. For example, chromium (—0,74 V), zinc (—0,76 V), titanium (—0,89 V), aluminum (—1,71 V) etc. withstand corrosion much better than iron (—0,42 V). This is due to the fact that the surface of these metals coats with an insoluble very thin layer, just a veil, of hard-bitten oxide not reactive at all that, at variance with rust, passivizes the surface blocking the prosecution of corrosion. Table 13.2 provides a synoptic picture of the standard potentials, the so called electrode potential, relative to oxidation reactions of various metals. The standard electrode potential, abbreviated as , is given in volts and is the measure of the potential of any individual metal electrode which is with solute at an elfective concentration of 1 mol/dm at 1 atm of pressure. These potentials are referred to a hydrogen electrode whose reference potential is assumed equal to zero. This is because it is not possible to measure experimentally the value of the dilference of potential Ay between an electrode and its solution as, for example, in the case of zinc reaction (13.16), because any device used for making the measurement must be inserted in the circuit with two electrodes of which one is put in contact with the metal electrode of interest and the other with the solution. Now, this second electrode creates necessarily another interface metal-solution and the potential difference provided by the system is that between the two metals, without any possibility to infer the absolute value of each of them. This is why it is necessary to introduce a reference electrode, which any other potential can be referred to. To... [Pg.662]

Electrolysis is possible only if ions can move to the electrodes. A common method for producing ion mobility is dissolving the substance to be electrolyzed in water. This method cannot be used for aluminum because water is more easily reduced than Al3+, as the following standard reduction potentials show ... [Pg.495]

You decide to construct a zinc/aluminum galvanic cell in which the electrodes are connected by a wire and the solutions are connected with a salt bridge. One electrode consists of an aluminum bar in a 1.0 M solution of aluminum(ni) nitrate. The other electrode consists of a zinc bar in a 1.0 M solution of zinc(II) nitrate. Zinc(II) has a more positive standard reduction potential than A1(III). [Pg.297]

Fig. 10. Measurement of norepinephrine and epinephrine in human plasma. Explanation of traces from left to right. A (1) Norepinephrine standard (10 pmol injected) (2) epinephrine standard (10 pmol injected) (3) dopamine standard (10 pmol injected). B (1) Plasma (1.1 ml) collected during a normoglycemic baseline period. Dopamine (10 pmol) added as internal standard prior to aluminum oxide adsorption. Sensitivity changes from 100 nA to 1 nA full scale deflection immediately after elution of the solvent front. Note the small norepinephrine (0.57 nmol/liter) and epinephrine (0.74 nmol/liter) peaks (2) plasma (1.1 ml) from the same subject, insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Note the marked increase in the epinephrine (5.16 nmol/liter) peak and the small rise in norepinephrine (0.75 nmol/liter). Dopamine (10 pmol) added as internal standard. Chromatographic conditions column, Nucleosil (10 [x), 30 cm X 2.1 mm mobile phase, acetate/citrate, 0.1 M, pH 5.2 flow rate, 1.2 ml/min electrode potential, +0.65 V (carbon paste) volume injected, 100 xl plasma extraction, alumina adsorption (Fig. 8). Fig. 10. Measurement of norepinephrine and epinephrine in human plasma. Explanation of traces from left to right. A (1) Norepinephrine standard (10 pmol injected) (2) epinephrine standard (10 pmol injected) (3) dopamine standard (10 pmol injected). B (1) Plasma (1.1 ml) collected during a normoglycemic baseline period. Dopamine (10 pmol) added as internal standard prior to aluminum oxide adsorption. Sensitivity changes from 100 nA to 1 nA full scale deflection immediately after elution of the solvent front. Note the small norepinephrine (0.57 nmol/liter) and epinephrine (0.74 nmol/liter) peaks (2) plasma (1.1 ml) from the same subject, insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Note the marked increase in the epinephrine (5.16 nmol/liter) peak and the small rise in norepinephrine (0.75 nmol/liter). Dopamine (10 pmol) added as internal standard. Chromatographic conditions column, Nucleosil (10 [x), 30 cm X 2.1 mm mobile phase, acetate/citrate, 0.1 M, pH 5.2 flow rate, 1.2 ml/min electrode potential, +0.65 V (carbon paste) volume injected, 100 xl plasma extraction, alumina adsorption (Fig. 8).
Corrosion of steel is known by engineers as the result of electrochemical reaction when different potentials are developed by electrically connected metal parts in contact with a solution containing free ions. The so-called electrode potential is dependent on the particular metal and the nature of the solution. Comparative values of electrode potentials may be measured against a standard electrode-electrol)de system. For example, if hydrogen is considered of zero V electrode potential, then lead, iron, zinc and aluminum potentials are 0.13,0.44,0.75 and 1.66 V, resp>ectively. [Pg.81]

Aluminum dichlorohydrate, antiperspirant ingredient, 7 848t Aluminum difluoride, 2 360, 361 Aluminum electrodes, standard potential, 3 413t... [Pg.41]

Chloroaluminate Systems. In case of chloroaluminate ionic liquids, the potential of an aluminum electrode immersed in the acidic ionic liquids which contain AICI3 at more than 50 mol% is usually assumed as the potential standard. [Pg.32]

CPs are able to raise the surface potential and provide anodic protection of the substrate material. Tallman et al. [61] reported that the redox potential of PANI is 0.4 to 1.0 V [vs. standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) at pH 7] and that of polythiophene is 0.8 to 1.2 V. Both values are higher when compared to the corrosion potential of steel and aluminum. This indicates that both PANI and poly thiophene are able to passivate the surface of both steel and aluminum. Anodic protection alone can be fatal if the... [Pg.400]


See other pages where Aluminum standard electrode potential is mentioned: [Pg.218]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.1215]    [Pg.1176]    [Pg.1217]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.1111]    [Pg.958]    [Pg.1253]    [Pg.919]    [Pg.955]    [Pg.1174]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.695]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.628]    [Pg.607]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.496 ]




SEARCH



Aluminum electrodes

Electrode standard

Electrodes standardization

Potential aluminum

Potential standard

Potentials, standardization

© 2024 chempedia.info