Alkenes catalyst comparison

On the other hand, complexes 1 with a very basic and electron-rich Pd center serves as a hydrogenation catalyst for alkenes. In comparison, the less basic la is a poor catalyst. 

To investigate whether catalysts CP30-CP33 were still effective for MBH reaction, we tested them in the reaction of aldehydes with activated alkenes. For comparison, the catalyst CP17 and newly designed catalysts CP34-CP38... 

Numerous examples have been pubhshed dealing with the heterogeneization of copper complexes, as immobihzed catalysts for the asymmetric cyclo-propanation of alkenes. Some of them have already been mentioned in the text for a direct comparison with their homogeneous coimterparts. Other reusable catalytic systems have been developed and will be described as follows. 

Figure 7.13f). Although addition of Cu initially promotes isomerization of 1-alk-ene (initially higher l-alkene/2-alkene ratio for 100Fe/4.6Si/5.0K/2.0Cu in comparison with 100Fe/5.1Si/5.0K catalyst Figure 7.13e), at steady conditions the effect is marginal.

In comparison with the platinum catalysts, rhodium catalysts are much more reactive to effect addition of bis(catecholato)diboron even to non-strained internal alkenes under mild reaction conditions (Equation (5)).53-55 This higher reactivity prompted trials on the asymmetric diboration of alkenes. Diastereoselective addition of optically active diboron derived from (li ,2i )-diphenylethanediol for />-methoxystyrene gives 60% de (Equation (6)).50 Furthermore, enantioselective diboration of alkenes with bis(catecolato)diboron has been achieved by using Rh(nbd)(acac)/(A)-QUINAP catalyst (Equation (7)).55,56 The reaction of internal (A)-alkenes with / //-butylethylene derivatives gives high enantioselectivities (up to 98% ee), whereas lower ee s are obtained in the reaction of internal (Z)-alkenes, styrene, and a-methylstyrene. 

Table 2. Formation of tri- and tetrasubstituted alkenes by RCM comparison of the efficiency of catalysts 1 and 24 (E=COOMe)a [19]...

P,N and non-phosphorus ligands have been most successful in the enantiomeric iridium-catalyzed hydrogenation of unfunctionalized alkenes [5], and for this reason this chapter necessarily overlaps with Chapter 30. Here, the emphasis is on ligand synthesis and structure, whereas Chapter 30 expands on substrates, reaction conditions and reaction optimization. However, a number of specific substrates are mentioned in the comparison of catalysts, and their structures are illustrated in Figure 29.1. 

The key feature of efficient metathesis catalysts seems to be their ability to form, before the [2 + 2] cycloaddition step, a n complex with the alkene (Figure 1.7). Comparison of catalyst 1 with the iron complex 3 shows that the latter, although cationic, will not be able to bind to an olefin, because this would give rise to a complex with 20 valence electrons. A similar argument can be used... 

Other functionalized supports that are able to serve in the asymmetric dihydroxylation of alkenes were reported by the groups of Sharpless (catalyst 25) [88], Sal-vadori (catalyst 26) [89-91] and Cmdden (catalyst 27) (Scheme 4.13) [92]. Commonly, the oxidations were carried out using K3Fe(CN)g as secondary oxidant in acetone/water or tert-butyl alcohol/water as solvents. For reasons of comparison, the dihydroxylation of trons-stilbene is depicted in Scheme 4.13. The polymeric catalysts could be reused but had to be regenerated after each experiment by treatment with small amounts of osmium tetroxide. A systematic study on the role of the polymeric support and the influence of the alkoxy or aryloxy group in the C-9 position of the immobilized cinchona alkaloids was conducted by Salvadori and coworkers [89-91]. Co-polymerization of a dihydroquinidine phthalazine derivative with hydroxyethylmethacrylate and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate afforded a functionalized polymer (26) with better swelling properties in polar solvents and hence improved performance in the dihydroxylation process [90]. 

Solubility of the reactants and products in the catalyst-containing aqueous phase is another factor to be considered. The solubility of >C3 terminal olefins rapidly decreases with increasing chain length [7] as shown in Table 4.3. The solubihty data in the middle colunm of Table 4.3 refer to room temperature, therefore the values for ethene through 1-butene show the solubility of gases, while the data for 1-pentene through 1-octene refer to solubihties of liquids. For comparison, the solubihties of hquid propene and 1-butene are also shown (third colunm), these were calculated using a known relation between aqueous solubihty and molar volume of n-alkenes [60]. 

The first example involving a rhodium catalyst in an ene reaction was reported by Schmitz in 1976. An intramolecular cyclization of a diene occurred to give a pyrrole when exposed to rhodium trichloride in isobutanol (Eq. 2) [15]. Subsequently to this work, Grigg utilized Wilkinson s catalyst to effect a similar cycloisomerization reaction (Eq. 3) [16]. Opplozer and Eurstner showed that a n -allyl-rhodium species could be formed from an allyl carbonate or acetate and intercepted intramolecularly by an alkene to afford 1,4-dienes (Eq. 4). Hydridotetrakis(triphenylphosphine)rhodium(l) proved to be the most efficient catalyst for this particular transformation. A direct comparison was made between this catalyst and palladium bis(dibenzylidene) acetone, in which it was determined that rhodium might offer an additional stereochemical perspective. In the latter case, this type of reaction is typically referred to as a metallo-ene reaction [17]. 

Comparison of the results for catalytic isomerization of pent-l-ene to trans-pent-2-ene with the basic and one-electron donating properties of the catalysts led to the conclusion that two different reaction mechanisms operate in double bond isomerization reactions (a) an ionic mechanism which involves proton abstraction from the alkene molecule by the super base site (pAia = 37 for pentenes) and (b) a free radical mechanism which involves the abstraction of a hydrogen atom from the alkene by the one-electron donor center (Scheme 39). 

Typical procedure The mole ratio of alkene t-BuOOH catalyst was 10 10 0.25 and 40 mmol of the olefin serving as its own solvent. Thus, 10 mmol of TBHP (80% in di-tert-butyl peroxide) and 0.25 mmol of vanadium pentoxide were added to 50 mmol of the olefin and the reaction mixture was stirred at 60°C under a dinitrogen atmosphere. The products formed were analyzed by GC by comparison of their retention time with those of authentic samples. Good yields of epoxides were obtained only with an excess of olefin to TBHP of 5 1. That the olefin doubles up as the solvent makes for a more practical procedure. Typical results (34) are shown in Table 1 ... 

Nevertheless, the mechanism of the Shvo s catalyst has been one of the most controversial regarding the nature of the hydrogen-transfer process (84). The analysis of this reaction mechanism served as an example of comparison of both the inner- and outer-sphere reaction pathways for hydrogenation of polar, C=0 (85-87) and C=N (88—95) and unpolar bonds (95). In the next subsections are presented the mechanistic studies we carried out for the hydrogenation of ketones, imines, alkenes, and alkynes (29,87,95). 

For the hydroformylation, (PPli j) Rli( H)(CO) with host 11 was used as the catalyst. An excess of PPhj (stemming from the catalyst precursor) was needed to avoid isomerization, as was found when phosphine-free precursors were used (at the concentrations used even bidentates should be added in excess to prevent substantial exchange with carbon monoxide). Linear to branched ratios of 2 1 were obtained and no isomerized alkene could be detected. These results are similar to those obtained by Kalck and coworkers [41]. As expected, catalysis for 11 is slower than that for (PPh3)3Rh(H)(CO) as the host is a bidentate phosphine catalysis with (PPh3)3Rh (H)(CO) strongly depends on the concentrations of rhodium and PPh3 and comparison of the rates of the two systems does not make sense. 

---