Afterword

You are part of a development group assigned to determine the properties and phase behavior of certain mixtures that are to be used in a new process for your company. Your supervisor is relying on the group to provide a quick and thorough assessment of the proposed process each day of production delay costs the company one million dollars. 

Furthermore, early models had to be simple because hand calculation was necessarily the mode, but now computer-based process simulators readily solve complex, multiparameter equations. Such simulators enable us to generate alternative what-if scenarios to study feasibility and optimization they also allow us to probe the smallest details of process facilities and conditions. However, this powerful capability is limited by the approximations we provide to the simulator and by our interpretations of the output that the simulator provides to us. Casual, uncritical use of process simulators can obscure the significance of results and lead to process designs that are physically unrealizable. Therefore, you must give some attention to the accuracy with which property values will be needed and to the computational resources that will be required to achieve the required accuracy. 

You and your coworkers begin to organize your plan of attack. You conclude that the process is not far enough along for detailed design there are still issues about catalyst life and raw materials that are to be solved by others. Those problems could cause the project to be delayed or canceled. So at this point, feasibility is the most important concern. That is, in identifying the steps by which raw materials are to be converted into valuable products, two aspects come crucially into play feasibility, in terms of Nature s possibilities, and economic opportunity, in terms of alternatives and human valuation. Inevitably a new product can be made in many different ways, but infeasible and uneconomic paths should be eliminated early in a design process, and thermodynamics can play an invaluable role in this endeavor. 

Now you begin to ask about the conditions and species of the process What are the temperatures and pressures relative to the melting and critical values Are the compositions nearly pure or very dilute Are the molecules of the substances likely to associate with themselves or solvate with others Are there to be additional solvents and what are their properties You also formulate relevant always true relations and you begin to consider appropriate models for nonideal gases and nonideal solutions. These questions can usually be answered by elementary analysis, shrewd selection of property formulation, reasonable estimates of property values, and thoughtful evaluation of the results. In this way you should be able to address and prioritize the overwhelming number of questions that always arise in a new undertaking. 

These assumptions may be inadequate for many engineering situations of contemporary interest however, this does not mean that the thermodynamic laws are invalid or that the basic methodology must be modified. For example, all of the operations in Chapter 3 remain valid, but the specifics wiU need to be adapted to treat complex cases. In particular, extensions must be made to include the effects of system size, additional work modes and their variables, and effects of molecular configuration, especially as density and composition change. 

Portiuns of ihis chapter included material from the lenlh edition chapter by John W. Regun. The author is grateful for the use of thi.s content. 

Benson, D. A. Nucl. Acids Rev.. (Hlt t7 20. 2002. y. GetiBunk. NCBI. )itli s //www.nchi.ntm.nih.gov/GeiiBunk/gcnhanks iats.lninl. 

4 PhamuiLVuticul Research and Manufacturers Association New Mcih cinc.s in Biotechnology Survey. Wa.shingt( n. DC, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Associuiion. 2002. 

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufaciureni Assix iulion New Medicines in Oevelopincnl fm Pediatrics Survey. Washington. DC, Plur-niaceulical Research and Muiiufacturcrs AsMx iution. 2(N)2. 

Concepts Hosp Pharm. Manage. Ili4) l2-I 1989. 

The few reactions discussed in this mini-chapter hardly scratch the surface of inorganic chemistry. The illustrative symmetry analyses, drawn for the most part from work in which the author was directly involved, were presented in the hope that a few bona fide inorganic chemists may be persuaded that the ideas developed in the preceding chapters are not limited to the organic domain. In having thus ventured gingerly into an area that is not his own, the author draws sustenance from the precept enunciated by an ancient sage [26] The task is not yours to complete, but neither are you at liberty to shirk it.  

---

Artificial Life and the Homunculus Chapter Five. The Art-Nature Debate and the Issue of Experiment Afterword. Further Ramifications of the Art-Nature Debate... 

Debus, Allen George. Afterword alchemy and the history of science. Cauda Pavonis 10, no. 1 (Spring 1991) 13-14. 

Includes a Preface and an Afterword which discuss the myth... 

The more original a discovery, the more obvious it seems afterword. 

In a major new Afterword for this edition, Behe explains that the complexity discovered by microbiologists has dramatically increased since the book was first published. That complexity is a continuing challenge to Darwinism, and evolutionists have had no success at explaining it. Darwins Black Box is more important today than ever. 

---