Adsorption integral

The Adsorption Integrated Reaction (AlR-11) process is a destructive photocatalytic oxidation (PCO) process for the treatment of gas-phase waste streams that can operate successfully at low concentrations of contaminants and at a low energy cost. In the process, ultraviolet (UV) light illuminates a proprietary catalyst at room temperature, and produces hydroxyl radicals, which destroy organic compounds by oxidation. Very few by-products are created by the process, and many contaminants are broken down into harmless carbon dioxide and water. 

The cost of any photocatalytic oxidation (PCO) technology, including the Adsorption Integrated Reaction (AIR-II) process, is dependent on a number of variables. These include photoefficiency, ultraviolet intensity, contaminant concentration, and the desired level of destruction of contaminants. 

Fig. 11.12 Electrochemical activity (area-specific activity) normalized by the surface area of Pt for the most active alloys. The Pt surface area was determined electrochemically using the hydrogen adsorption integral of each catalyst.

Fig. 11.20 Summary of relative area-normalized and Pt weight-fraction-normalized activities of pure Pt, Pt52Ru48, and two Pt-Ru-Co compositions at 550 mV/RHE in acidic solution. Hydrogen adsorption integrals were measured before electrochemical screening for methanol.

The structure of the activated carbon is represented by a distribution of slit-shaped pores. In a PSD model, the total adsorption is given by the adsorption integral equation (ABE) [4] ... 

One method for the characterization of porous solids bases on the concept of the adsorption integral equation [1,2]. It requires to access the local isotherms for a wide range of pore widths. Because experiments cannot provide local isotherms of well-defined pores, a big demand results for suitable theoretical descriptions of the physical adsorption. 

Gas sorption porosimetry is a standard method for the characterization of the pore size distribution (PSD) of porous solids. To interpret the experimental isotherm and obtain the adsorbent PSD, one must adopt a model for the pore structure, and a theory that estimates the adsorption that will occur in pores of a particular size. If the porous solid is represented as an array of independent, noninterconnected pores of uniform geometry and identical surface chemistry, then the excess adsorption, /JP), at bulk gas pressure P is given by the adsorption integral equation... 

The most commonly used approximate model for pore topology is to represent the pore volume of the adsorbent as an array of independent, chemical homogeneous, noninterconnected pores of some simple geometry usually, these are slit-shaped for activated carbons and cylindrical-shaped for glasses, silicas, and other porous oxides. Usually, the heterogeneity is approximated by a distribution of pore sizes, it being implicitly assumed that all pores have the same shape and the same surface chemistry. In this case, the excess adsorption, r(P), at bulk gas pressure P can be represented by the adsorption integral equation... 

A consequence of the ill-posed nature of Eq. (14), therefore, is that different PSD results can be obtained for the same material if different methods are applied to solve the adsorption integral equation, even if the same experimental data and adsorption model are used in both cases. A standard protocol has not yet been agreed upon for the use of regularization in pore size characterization. To avoid confusion in comparing PSD results, therefore, the numerical method employed to solve for the PSD and the type of regularization, if any, implemented to smooth the PSD should both be clearly identihed. 

Equation (7.9) is therefore the general form for any adsorption isotherm and corresponds to equation IV-4 of Ref [3]. Equation (7.9) is now often referred to as the integral equation of adsorption or the generalized adsorption integral. The function q(p,Uo) is called the kernel function or the local isotherm. The local isotherm can take various forms, depending on the geometry of the system that Eqn (7.9) is being used to describe. 

We have seen that carbon materials encompass a very wide range of energetic heterogeneity as expressed through the variation in adsorptive potential. When the material is essentially nonporous, it can be characterized in a straightforward fashion by the deconvolution of the appropriate adsorption integral with interaction energy as the distributed parameter. 

An isotherm, introduced by O Brien and Myers (1984), is obtained as a truncation to two terms of a series expansion of the adsorption integral equation in terms of the central moments of the adsorption energy distribution. The isotherm equation takes the form ... 

As follows from the hitherto existing considerations, the adsorption integral equation can be solved considering the distribution function in an analytical and numerical way. Approximate methods are another set of methods used for... 

PSDs obtained by inversion of the adsorption integral equation as pm [11]... 

The ability to easily estimate the pore size distribution of porous materials is important for practical applications such as gas separation, purification and stor e. Carbonaceous porous materials constitute a widely used class of adsorbents. The measurement of an adsorption isotherm for carbons using a probe such as nitrogen or carbon dioxide is a routine task. For many applications but especially materials selection and design, it is important to be able to convert a measured isotherm into an accurate estimate of the PSD i.e. to invert the adsorption integral... 

The adsorption isotherm for the carbon material is related to the PSD by the adsorption integral equation ... 

A method for the determination of pore size distribution (PSD) is applied in the case of AX-21 carbon. Adsorption isotherms of CO2 (253,298 K) and H2 (77 K) up to 20 bar have been measured, while the computed isotherms resulted from GCMC simulations. The optimal PSD is determined by inverting the adsorption integral equation. Such PSDs were used to predict isotherms of other adsorbates and temperatures. Best predictions were obtained by employing the full relative pressure range PSD (CO2 at 253 K). In addition, optimal PSDs were deduced from the combined use of CO2 and H2 data. These were found to be capable of reproducing more accurately all the available experimental isotherms. 

By inverting the adsorption integral equation after including different combinations of experimental and GCMC data sets, new PSDs are obtained (Fig.l). In contrast to the in vidual PSDs, the three combined PSDs are similar to each other and can more accurately reproduce all the experimental isotherms (Fig. 2). As expected, the optimal PSD is obtained from the combination of all the data. It should also be mentioned that the combination of the two low relative pressure isotherms (H2 and CO2 at 298 K) could not reproduce the CO2 isotherm at 253 K (again because large pore information is missing). 

To obtain the PSD from the N2 and ethane isotherm data by molecular simulation, a method based on GCMC developed by Davies et al.[ll, 12] was used. The PSD is obtained from a set of model-pore isotherms and an experimental isotherm measured on the porous solid applying the adsorption integral equation ... 

The pore connectivity aspect has been neglected in the DFT analysis. It is possible that the adsorption in an individual pore is affected by the adsorption in an adjacent or a networked pore, which can complicate the adsorption integral. Better insight into the connectivity phenomenon has been provided by Seaton and co-workers using Monte Carlo simulations [32,33] and efforts to develop pore-junction models are on. 

---