Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Adsorption capacities concentration

The total stationary-phase volume required to process a given feed stream is proportional to the inlet concentration and volume of the feed. For example, for a typical inlet concentration of protein of 10 g/L, in a 100 L volume of feed, a column volume of at least 100 L is needed for size-exclusion chromatography. In comparison, an ion-exchange column having an adsorption capacity of 50 g/L would only require 20 L of column volume for the same feed. [Pg.51]

Adsorption (qv) of gases has been reviewed (40,50) (see also Adsorption, gas separation). Adsorption, used alone or in combination with other removal methods, is excellent for removing pollutant gases to extremely low concentrations, eg, 1 ppmv. When used in combination, it is typically the final step. Adsorption, always exothermic, is even more attractive when very large gas volumes must be made almost pollutant free. Because granular adsorbent beds ate difficult to cool because of poor heat transfer, gas precooling is often practiced to minimize adsorption capacity loss toward the end of the bed. Pretreatment to remove or reduce adsorbable molecules, such as water, competing for adsorption sites should also be considered (41). [Pg.387]

Design criteria for carbon adsorption include type and concentration of contaminant, hydrauhc loading, bed depth, and contact time. Typical ranges are 1.4—6.8 L/s/m for hydrauhc loading, 1.5—9.1 m for bed depth, and 10—50 minutes for contact time (1). The adsorption capacity for a particular compound or mixed waste stream can be deterrnined as an adsorption isotherm and pilot tested. The adsorption isotherm relates the observed effluent concentration to the amount of material adsorbed per mass of carbon. [Pg.161]

Compounds Maximum solubiUty in water, g/L Influent concentration, mg/L Adsorption capacity, kg/m ... [Pg.227]

Since adsorption takes place at the interphase boundaiy, the adsorption surface area becomes an important consideration. Generally, the higher the adsorption surface area, the greater its adsorption capacity. However, the surface area has to be available in a particular pore size within the adsorbent. At low partial pressure (or concentration) a surface area in the smallest pores in which the adsorbate can enter is the most efficient. At higher pressures the larger pores become more important at very high concentrations, capiDaiy condensation will take place within the pores, and the total micropore volume becomes the limiting factor. [Pg.2186]

Because of the limited adsorption capacity of the tube, the sampling period should not exceed 15 to 30 minutes. The time will depend to some degree on the expertise of the observer, since high concentrations of solvent vapors could saturate the first charcoal section in a few minutes. [Pg.277]

Adsorption for gas purification comes under the category of dynamic adsorption. Where a high separation efficiency is required, the adsorption would be stopped when the breakthrough point is reached. The relationship between adsorbate concentration in the gas stream and the solid may be determined experimentally and plotted in the form of isotherms. These are usually determined under static equilibrium conditions but dynamic adsorption conditions operating in gas purification bear little relationship to these results. Isotherms indicate the affinity of the adsorbent for the adsorbate but do not relate the contact time or the amount of adsorbent required to reduce the adsorbate from one concentration to another. Factors which influence the service time of an adsorbent bed include the grain size of the adsorbent depth of adsorbent bed gas velocity temperature of gas and adsorbent pressure of the gas stream concentration of the adsorbates concentration of other gas constituents which may be adsorbed at the same time moisture content of the gas and adsorbent concentration of substances which may polymerize or react with the adsorbent adsorptive capacity of the adsorbent for the adsorbate over the concentration range applicable over the filter or carbon bed efficiency of adsorbate removal required. [Pg.284]

The relationship between adsorption capacity and surface area under conditions of optimum pore sizes is concentration dependent. It is very important that any evaluation of adsorption capacity be performed under actual concentration conditions. The dimensions and shape of particles affect both the pressure drop through the adsorbent bed and the rate of diffusion into the particles. Pressure drop is lowest when the adsorbent particles are spherical and uniform in size. External mass transfer increases inversely with d (where, d is particle diameter), and the internal adsorption rate varies inversely with d Pressure drop varies with the Reynolds number, and is roughly proportional to the gas velocity through the bed, and inversely proportional to the particle diameter. Assuming all other parameters being constant, adsorbent beds comprised of small particles tend to provide higher adsorption efficiencies, but at the sacrifice of higher pressure drop. This means that sharper and smaller mass-transfer zones will be achieved. [Pg.291]

Adsorbate Concentration The adsorption capacity of adsorbents is directly... [Pg.292]

We wUl now touch upon some of these factors. First, let s look at what we mean by system isotherm. Freundlich liquid phase isotherm studies can be used to establish the adsorptive capacity of activated carbon over a range of different concentrations. Under standard conditions, the adsorptive capacity of activated carbon increases as the concentration increases, until we reach a point of maximum saturation capacity. An example of an isotherm for phenol is shown in Figure 8. [Pg.412]

The Freundlich liquid phase isotherm can be used to determine the effect of solubility on the adsorptive capacity of activated carbon over a range of different concentrations. Phenol is highly soluble due to its polar nature whilst, in comparison, tetrachloroethylene (PCE) has a low solubility due to being non-polar. In the isotherms illustrated, the concentration of phenol is low relative to its solubility limit and consequently, the adsorptive capacity peaks at 18% maximum (see Figure 9). In comparison the concentration of tetrachloroethylene is relatively close to its solubility limit and, accordingly, the adsorptive capacity is exceptionally good. [Pg.413]

The adsorption process generally is of an exothermal nature. With increasing temperature and decreasing adsorbate concentration the adsorption capacity decreases. For the design of adsorption processes it is important to know the adsorption capacity at constant temperature in relation to the adsorbate concentration. Figure 11 shows the adsorption isotherms for several common solvents. [Pg.414]

Plant uptake is one of several routes by which an organic contaminant can enter man s food chain. The amount of uptake depends on plant species, concentration, depth of placement, soil type, temperature, moisture, and many other parameters. Translocation of the absorbed material into various plant parts will determine the degree of man s exposure—i.e., whether the material moves to an edible portion of the plant. Past experience with nonpolar chlorinated pesticides suggested optimal uptake conditions are achieved when the chemical is placed in a soil with low adsorptive capacity e.g., a sand), evenly distributed throughout the soil profile, and with oil producing plants. Plant experiments were conducted with one set of parameters that would be optimal for uptake and translocation. The uptake of two dioxins and one phenol (2,4-dichlorophenol (DCP)) from one soil was measured in soybean and oats (7). The application rates were DCP = 0.07 ppm, DCDD 0.10 ppm, and TCDD = 0.06 ppm. The specific activity of the com-... [Pg.109]

In a separate study, Igwe and Abia46 determined the equilibrium adsorption isotherms of Cd(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) ions and detoxification of wastewater using unmodified and ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA)-modified maize husks as a biosorbent. This study established that maize husks are excellent adsorbents for the removal of these metal ions, with the amount of metal ions adsorbed increasing as the initial concentrations increased. The study further established that EDTA modification of maize husks enhances the adsorption capacity of maize husks, which is attributed to the chelating ability of EDTA. Therefore, this study demonstrates that maize husks, which are generally considered as biomass waste, may be used as adsorbents for heavy metal removal from wastewater streams from various industries and would therefore find application in various parts of the world where development is closely tied to affordable cost as well as environmental cleanliness.46... [Pg.1324]

Cathodic stripping voltammetry has been used [807] to determine lead, cadmium, copper, zinc, uranium, vanadium, molybdenum, nickel, and cobalt in water, with great sensitivity and specificity, allowing study of metal specia-tion directly in the unaltered sample. The technique used preconcentration of the metal at a higher oxidation state by adsorption of certain surface-active complexes, after which its concentration was determined by reduction. The reaction mechanisms, effect of variation of the adsorption potential, maximal adsorption capacity of the hanging mercury drop electrode, and possible interferences are discussed. [Pg.277]


See other pages where Adsorption capacities concentration is mentioned: [Pg.305]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.2062]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.906]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.643]    [Pg.806]    [Pg.829]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.592]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.216]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.66 , Pg.67 ]




SEARCH



Adsorption capacity

Adsorption concentrations

Adsorptive capacity

© 2024 chempedia.info