Adhesive joints shear tests

In technical data sheets, the strength of an adhesive is generally stated in terms of its tensile lap-shear strength which is determined by performing tests on a singlelap adhesive joint. The test piece is subjected to a shearing stress by applying a tensile load axially to the two lapped substrates (Fig. 28). 

The principal type of shear test specimen used in the industry, the lap shear specimen, is 2.54 cm wide and has a 3.23-cm overlap bonded by the adhesive. Adherends are chosen according to the industry aluminum for aerospace, steel for automotive, and wood for constmction appHcations. Adhesive joints made in this fashion are tested to failure in a tensile testing machine. The temperature of test, as weU as the rate of extension, are specified. Results are presented in units of pressure, where the area of the adhesive bond is considered to be the area over which the force is appHed. Although the 3.23-cm ... 

Fig. 1, Schematic of commonly u.sed methods for testing the strength of adhesive joints, (a) Peel test. Note that the peel angle can be changed depending on the test requirements, (b) Double overlap shear test. In this test, the failure is predominantly mode II. (c) Single overlap shear test. In this test the failure mode is mixture of mode I and mode II. (d) Blister test.

Table 1 contains the metal-to-metal engineering property requirements for Boeing Material Specification (BMS) 5-101, a structural film adhesive for metal to metal and honeycomb sandwich use in areas with normal temperature exposure. The requirements are dominated by shear strength tests. Shear strength is the most critical engineering property for structural adhesives, at least for the simplistic joint analysis that is commonly used for metal-to-metal secondary structure on commercial aircraft. Adhesive Joints are purposefully loaded primarily in shear as opposed to tension or peel modes as adhesives are typically stronger in shear than in Mode I (load normal to the plane of the bond) loading. 

Patel et al. [70] in a recent publication have explored the adhesive action of the mbber-siUca hybrid nanocomposites on different substrates. The rubber-silica hybrid nanocomposites are synthesized through in situ silica formation from TEOS in strong acidic pH within acryhc copolymer (EA-BA) and terpolymer (EA-BA-AA) matrices. The transparent nanocomposites have been apphed in between the aluminum (Al), wood (W), and biaxially oriented polypropylene (PP) sheets separately and have been tested for peel strength, lap shear strength, and static holding power of the adhesive joints. 

The lap shear test involves measuring the adhesive shear strength between two surface fluorinated polyolefin sheet tokens that are adhesively secured with a reinforcement resin. The tokens are individually reinforced with steel backing plates to eliminate flexural distortion in the shear joint. Lap shear tests carried out with various reinforcing polyester-type resins, contrasting fluorination and oxyfluorination as surface treatment, are shown in Table 16.8. 

In applications where possible degrading elements exist, candidate adhesives must be tested under simulated service conditions. Standard lap shear tests, such as ASTM D1002, which use a single rate of loading and a standard laboratory environment, do not yield optimal information on the service life of the joint. Important information such as the maximum load that the adhesive joint will withstand for extended periods and the degrading effects of various chemical environments are addressed by several test methods. Table 15.2 lists common ASTM environmental tests that are often reported in the literature. 

There are two categories of common tests for adhesives fundamental property tests and end-use tests. End-use tests, such as peel and shear, are those that try to simulate the type of loading and service conditions to which a joint will be subjected. These tests are relatively straightforward, but experience is required to establish the correct sample type and testing procedures, judge the reliability of the resulting data, and interpret the results and apply them to a practical application. 

Structural adhesives usually require curing by the application of heat, the addition of a catalyst, the addition of pressure, or a combination of the three. The strength developed in the adhesive joint at various times during the curing process may be determined by lap shear tensile specimens. This test is commonly used to determine when an adhesive or sealant is fully cured or when the system reaches a handling strength so that the assembled product can be moved with moderate care. 

ASTM D 1144 provides a recommended practice for determining the rate of bond strength development for either tensile or lap shear specimens. However, peel and can-teliever tests can also be used effectively. Measured bond strength values of partially cured test specimens are compared with those of a reference (i.e., fully cured adhesive joint) to assess the extent of cure. This method may suit some applications, but it is limited in accuracy because it does not directly measure the degree of cure in the adhesive, and the effect on the joint design and substrates may override the effect of cure development. 

D 2919 Test Method for Determining Durability of Adhesive Joints Stressed in Shear... 

Shear Sandwich Joints in Shear by Tension Loading D 3165 Test Method for Strength Properties of Adhesives in Shear by Tension Loading... 

The paper is presented in three parts. First, the tests employed to determine the mixed mode fracture envelope of a glass fibre reinforced epoxy composite adhesively bonded with either a brittle or a ductile adhesive are briefly described. These include mode I (DCB), and mixed mode (MMB) with various mixed mode (I/II) ratios. In the second part of the paper different structural joints will be discussed. These include single and double lap shear and L-specimens. In a recent European thematic network lap shear and double lap shear composite joints were tested, and predictions of failure load were made by different academic and industrial partners [9,10]. It was apparent that considerable differences existed between different analytical predictions and FE analyses, and correlation with tests proved complex. In particular, the progressive damage development in assemblies bonded with a ductile adhesive was not treated adequately. A more detailed study of damage mechanisms was therefore undertaken, using image analysis combined with microscopy to examine the crack tip strain fields and measure adherend displacements. This is described below and correlation is made between predicted displacements and failure loads, based on the mixed mode envelope determined previously, and measured values. 

Because of the high scattering of experimental results and the great difficulty in reaching the fully cohesive failure of wooden adhesive Joints, a numerical analysis has been made to give a better knowledge of their mechanical behaviour for various parameters (adhesive used. Joint thickness, loading mode, etc...). For the PU resin tested previously in shear, such an analysis has been made on two steps first simulations have been made on bulk adhesive specimen to determine the mechanical behaviour of the resin and the numerical results obtained have been implanted in the FE code CASTEM 2000 [21] for the mTENF bonded specimen loaded by shear. 

This test is carried out according to the standard DIN EN 1465 Adhesives - Determination of the tensile shear strength of high strength lap joints. The test piece has the dimensions according to Figure 10.2. 

Beams of series I were tested to determine the load-bearing capacity on the bending moment. Beams of series II were tested to determine resistance to action of the shear forces. Both series were controls. Series III of the beams were tested to determinate the load-bearing capacity of adhesive joints of SPC adhesive joint structures. Epoxyliquid glass adhesive (composition no. 5, Table 3.11) was accepted for joint grouting. 

Generally, multiple experimental test data of adhesive material are necessary for an adequate representation of the joint behavior under loading. Uniaxial tension, compression and single lap shear tests were therefore performed. 

---