Transfer activity coefficients

Quantitative Analysis Using the Method of Standard Additions Because of the difficulty of maintaining a constant matrix for samples and standards, many quantitative potentiometric methods use the method of standard additions. A sample of volume, Vx) and analyte concentration, Cx, is transferred to a sample cell, and the potential, (ficell)x) measured. A standard addition is made by adding a small volume, Vs) of a standard containing a known concentration of analyte, Cs, to the sample, and the potential, (ficell)s) measured. Provided that Vs is significantly smaller than Vx, the change in sample matrix is ignored, and the analyte s activity coefficient remains constant. Example 11.7 shows how a one-point standard addition can be used to determine the concentration of an analyte. 

Example 8 Calculation of Rate-Based Distillation The separation of 655 lb mol/h of a bubble-point mixture of 16 mol % toluene, 9.5 mol % methanol, 53.3 mol % styrene, and 21.2 mol % ethylbenzene is to be earned out in a 9.84-ft diameter sieve-tray column having 40 sieve trays with 2-inch high weirs and on 24-inch tray spacing. The column is equipped with a total condenser and a partial reboiler. The feed wiU enter the column on the 21st tray from the top, where the column pressure will be 93 kPa, The bottom-tray pressure is 101 kPa and the top-tray pressure is 86 kPa. The distillate rate wiU be set at 167 lb mol/h in an attempt to obtain a sharp separation between toluene-methanol, which will tend to accumulate in the distillate, and styrene and ethylbenzene. A reflux ratio of 4.8 wiU be used. Plug flow of vapor and complete mixing of liquid wiU be assumed on each tray. K values will be computed from the UNIFAC activity-coefficient method and the Chan-Fair correlation will be used to estimate mass-transfer coefficients. Predict, with a rate-based model, the separation that will be achieved and back-calciilate from the computed tray compositions, the component vapor-phase Miirphree-tray efficiencies. 

Some authors" express the transfer free energy in the form of an activity coefficient defined by Eq. (8-59). 

Without some additional relationship it is impossible to resolve y into and "y. By introducing an extrathermodynamic assumption as this additional relationship, it becomes possible to estimate single ion transfer activity coefficients. A widely used assumption is that the transfer activity coefficients of the cation and anion of tetraphenylarsonium tetraphenylboride, Ph4As BPh4, are equal, i.e.,... 

By combining these ions with other counterions, single ion transfer activity coefficients are calculated. By these techniques transfer free energies or activity coefficients have been determined for many ions and nonelectrolytes in a wide variety of solvents.Parker has discussed the extrathermodynamic assumptions that lead to single ion quantities. 

Usually SmGo is a small difference between two large numbers, so it is more accurate to measure 8mG directly by the techniques discussed above than to estimate it indirectly. Solvation is then usually considered in terms of transfer free energies or activity coefficients. 

Table 8-8 gives some nonelectrolyte transfer free energies, and Table 8-9 lists single ion transfer activity coefficients. Note especially the remarkable values for anions in dipolar aprotic solvents, indicating extensive desolvation in these solvents relative to methanol. This is consistent with the enhanced nucleophilic reactivity of anions in dipolar aprotic solvents. Parker and Blandamer have considered transfer activity coefficients for binary aqueous mixtures. 

In Chapter 7 we found it convenient to distinguish between proton transfers involving a solvent molecule and those involving only solute particles but this difference will lose its significance when the distinction between solvent and solute begins to break down. We recall that in Sec. 54 the mole fraction of the solvent did not differ appreciably from unity and could be omitted from (72). In investigating concentrated solutions, however, there is no question of extrapolating to infinite dilution the mole fraction of the solvent will differ from unity and will have to be retained in all formulas. At the same time each of the mole fractions will need to be multiplied by its activity coefficient. 

Le Hung presented a general theoretical approach for calculating the Galvani potential Ajyj at the interface of two immiscible electrolyte solutions, e.g., aqueous (w) and organic solvent (s) [25]. Le Hung s approach allows the calculation of when the initial concentration (Cj), activity coefficients (j/,) and standard energies of transfer of ions (AjG ) are known in both solutions. 

Similarly, concepts of solvation must be employed in the measurement of equilibrium quantities to explain some anomalies, primarily the salting-out effect. Addition of an electrolyte to an aqueous solution of a non-electrolyte results in transfer of part of the water to the hydration sheath of the ion, decreasing the amount of free solvent, and the solubility of the nonelectrolyte decreases. This effect depends, however, on the electrolyte selected. In addition, the activity coefficient values (obtained, for example, by measuring the freezing point) can indicate the magnitude of hydration numbers. Exchange of the open structure of pure water for the more compact structure of the hydration sheath is the cause of lower compressibility of the electrolyte solution compared to pure water and of lower apparent volumes of the ions in solution in comparison with their effective volumes in the crystals. Again, this method yields the overall hydration number. 

This coefficient has various names (medium effect, solvation activity coefficient, etc.) the name recommended by the responsible IUPAC commission is the transfer activity coefficient. In this book the effect of solvation in various solvents will be expressed exclusively in terms of standard Gibbs transfer energies. 

Mean activity coefficients can be measured potentiometrically, mostly in a concentration cell with or without transfer. Consider, for example, the cell (with a non-aqueous electrolyte solution)... 

Strangely, Reaction 25.2 proceeds backward in the early part of the calculation (Fig. 25.1), producing a small amount of potassium feldspar at the expense of muscovite and quartz. This result, quite difficult to explain from the perspective of mass transfer, is an activity coefficient effect. As seen in Figure 25.2, the activity coefficient for K+ increases rapidly as the fluid is diluted over the initial segment of the reaction path, whereas that for H+ remains nearly constant. (The activity coefficients differ because the a parameter in the Debyc-IIuckcl model is 3 A for K+ and 9 A for H+.) As a result, aK+ increases more quickly than aH+, temporarily driving Reaction 25.2 from right to left. 

All quantities in Eq. (12.6) are measurable The concentrations can be determined by titration, and the combination of chemical potentials in the exponent is the standard Gibbs energy of transfer of the salt, which is measurable, just like the mean ionic activity coefficients, because they refer to an uncharged species. In contrast, the difference in the inner potential is not measurable, and neither are the individual ionic chemical potentials and activity coefficients that appear on the right-hand side of Eq. (12.3). 

In principle, Gibbs free energies of transfer for trihalides can be obtained from solubilities in water and in nonaqueous or mixed aqueous solutions. However, there are two major obstacles here. The first is the prevalence of hydrates and solvates. This may complicate the calculation of AGtr(LnX3) values, for application of the standard formula connecting AGt, with solubilities requires that the composition of the solid phase be the same in equilibrium with the two solvent media in question. The other major hurdle is that solubilities of the trichlorides, tribromides, and triiodides in water are so high that knowledge of activity coefficients, which indeed are known to be far from unity 4b), is essential (201). These can, indeed, be measured, but such measurements require much time, care, and patience. 

Note that the tGA are the standard molar Gibbs energies of solvation of the (combined ions of the) electrolyte [5]. Alternatively, a transfer activity coefficient can be defined as... 

Phenoxatellurin, in addition to the other phenoxachalcogens, forms a crystalline complex, as donor, with 7,7,8,8-tetracyano-pflrfl-quinodimethane (TCNQ) whose stoichiometry was found to be 1 1. The equilibrium content and the activation coefficients are relatively small, suggesting that the complex formed in dicloromethane solution is relatively weak, probably due to the n-n charge transfer type. 

See also (b) O. Popovich, Transfer activity coefficients (medium effects) in Treatise on Analytical Chemistry, Part 1, 2nd ed., (Eds. ... 

---