Activation energy calculations using

Both 3-21G and 6-3IG Hartree-Fock models provide better and more consistent results in supplying reactant and transition-state geometries than the AMI calculations. Also the two Hartree-Fock models (unlike the AMI model) find reasonable transition states for all reactions. With only a few exceptions, activation energies calculated using approximate geometries differ from exact values by only 1-2 kcal/mol. 

Table I Activation energies for H and D transfer Three values are shown the activation energies calculated using a one- and two-dimensional Kramers problem and the experimental values.

Example of a and p activation energy calculations using PMMA 147... 

The new features of this Table are (i) the values calculated by me (1, 2 and 3) (ii) the recognition that the values quoted apply only over a range of m which depends on the nature of the solvent (iii) the k+p for styrene and EVE in solvents of low polarity are very similar. In my view none of these values and others in the literature are sufficiently reliable for any activation energies calculated from them to afford useful information. I have refrained from attempting a correlation of the rate constants with the dielectric constant of the diluent because in my view even the same cation in each different solvent is a different species, so that the fundamental hypothesis of theories of the Laidler type is not valid. 

Another method for determining the activation energy involves using a modification of the Arrhenius equation. If we try to use the Arrhenius equation directly, we have one equation with two unknowns (the frequency factor and the activation energy). The rate constant and the temperature are experimental values, while R is a constant. One way to prevent this difficulty is to perform the experiment twice. We determine experimental values of the rate constant at two different temperatures. We then assume that the frequency factor is the same at these two temperatures. We now have a new equation derived from the Arrhenius equation that allows us to calculate the activation energy. This equation is ... 

Data from tests at 250,275,300, and 325 C were used to calculate pseudo-first order rate constants for the formation of H2S. These data are expressed on a standard Arriienius plot (Fig. 2) for which the linear least squares coefficient of determination, r, is 0.98. The apparent activation energy calculated from the slope is 28.5 kcal/mol. This result is in excellent agreement with the recent work of Abotsi, who studied the performance of carbon-supported hydrodesulfurization catalysts (10). Using Ambersorb XE-348 carbon lo ed with sulfided ammonium molybdate (3% Mo loading) prepared by the same procedure reported here, Abotsi hydrotreated a coal-derived recycle solvent The apparent activation energy for... 

It goes without saying that direct comparison of calculated (absolute) activation energies with experimental 8a parameters is likely to prove problematic in some situations. For this reason, it is perhaps better to judge the performance of individual models by comparison with activation energies calculated from a standard reference. This standard has been chosen as MP2/6-311+G, the same level used as a standard to judge transition-state geometries. 

A second set of comparisons assesses the consequences of use of approximate reactant and transition-state geometries for relative activation energy calculations, that is, activation energies for a series of closely related reactions relative to the activation energy of one member of the series. Two different examples have been provided, both of which involve Diels-Alder chemistry. The first involves cycloadditions of cyclopentadiene and a series of electron-deficient dienophiles. Experimental activation energies (relative to Diels-Alder... 

Temperature Effects. Runs made at temperatures above 0°C., when plotted on Arrhenius graphs, gave fairly straight lines over the 25° to 30°C. interval (Figure 5). Table V shows activation energies calculated from the slopes, including some solutions for which only two temperatures were used. 

The temperature coefficients of viscosity for these systems (Tables. 2-5) Lave no characteristic points and cannot give additional data about the structure of the liquid phase. They involve the temperature coefficient of the equilibria in the systems, as well as the temperature coefficients of viscous flow of all the species constituting the mixtures. Their interpretation therefore is not easy and their direct use for the activation energy calculations is not justifiable. 

These are only rough guides to the true entropy change on activation. Detailed calculations using spectroscopic data for the reactants and a calculated potential energy surface for the activated complex will yield accurate partition functions for the translational, rotational and vibrational terms involved. Since the quantities contributing to the partition functions for each molecule will be different, then accurate calculations will be able to differentiate between such reactions as... 

The results from the nonlocal and hybrid DFT calculations show trends similar to those observed for the MO calculations. The computed geometries are very similar to each other the calculated bond lengths for the breaking bond range from 2.14 A, calculated by the hybrid adiabatic connection method (ACM) [24], to 2.16 A, calculated by the nonlocal BLYP [25, 26] functional. A comparison of the results from the nonlocal Becke-Perdew [27] calculations using DZVP and a TZVP basis sets shows that the geometries are influenced to a very small extent by basis set effects [12]. The activation energies calculated by the different nonlocal methods are too low by 1-3 kcal/mol, whereas the hybrid DFT methods overestimate Ea by approximately the same amount. Both the nonlocal and the hybrid DFT methods tend to overestimate the heat of reaction by up to 7 kcal/mol, calculated by the ACM/6-31G method. 

A plot of In k as a function of the reciprocal temperature gives a straight line with a slope of -E/R, from which E can be calculated. Another way to determine the activation energy is using two different values of k (k, and k2) at two different temperatures (T, and T2) ... 

We now determine the hole sizes of the various conformers of sar. Prepare the files of the six conformers of [Co(sar)]3+ by selecting the six Co-N bonds (Tools/ Build Selections) in each file to set up the constraints for the Energy calculations. Use the. out files but rename them as. hin. As outlined above, the strain energy vs. metal-donor-distance plots for the computation of the hole sizes need to be metal ion independent. Thus, you need to activate the option Without Energy of Selected Terms in the Energy setup window. Also, the donor-metal-donor valence angle term needs to be switched off, since this is also metal ion dependent. You can do that in the Edit/View/Force Field/Atom Type Parameters menu or in the Edit/View/Parameter Array window. Both options have been used before in this tutorial. 

---