Detection limits, activation analysis

Adsorptive stripping analysis involves pre-concentration of the analyte, or a derivative of it, by adsorption onto the working electrode, followed by voltanmietric iiieasurement of the surface species. Many species with surface-active properties are measurable at Hg electrodes down to nanoniolar levels and below, with detection limits comparable to those for trace metal detemiination with ASV. 

Because of the increasing emphasis on monitoring of environmental cadmium the detemiination of extremely low concentrations of cadmium ion has been developed. Table 2 Hsts the most prevalent analytical techniques and the detection limits. In general, for soluble cadmium species, atomic absorption is the method of choice for detection of very low concentrations. Mobile prompt gamma in vivo activation analysis has been developed for the nondestmctive sampling of cadmium in biological samples (18). 

Atomic absorption spectroscopy of VPD solutions (VPD-AAS) and instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) offer similar detection limits for metallic impurities with silicon substrates. The main advantage of TXRF, compared to VPD-AAS, is its multielement capability AAS is a sequential technique that requires a specific lamp to detect each element. Furthermore, the problem of blank values is of little importance with TXRF because no handling of the analytical solution is involved. On the other hand, adequately sensitive detection of sodium is possible only by using VPD-AAS. INAA is basically a bulk analysis technique, while TXRF is sensitive only to the surface. In addition, TXRF is fast, with an typical analysis time of 1000 s turn-around times for INAA are on the order of weeks. Gallium arsenide surfaces can be analyzed neither by AAS nor by INAA. 

Highly sensitive determination of "Tc is possible using today s advanced mass spectroscopic methods. However, orthodox determination methods of "Tc involving radiometric techniques or even activation analysis are still used because they are simple and can be done without expensive machines. The detection limits of typical analytical methods are listed in Table 1. 

To date, a few methods have been proposed for direct determination of trace iodide in seawater. The first involved the use of neutron activation analysis (NAA) [86], where iodide in seawater was concentrated by strongly basic anion-exchange column, eluted by sodium nitrate, and precipitated as palladium iodide. The second involved the use of automated electrochemical procedures [90] iodide was electrochemically oxidised to iodine and was concentrated on a carbon wool electrode. After removal of interference ions, the iodine was eluted with ascorbic acid and was determined by a polished Ag3SI electrode. The third method involved the use of cathodic stripping square wave voltammetry [92] (See Sect. 2.16.3). Iodine reacts with mercury in a one-electron process, and the sensitivity is increased remarkably by the addition of Triton X. The three methods have detection limits of 0.7 (250 ml seawater), 0.1 (50 ml), and 0.02 pg/l (10 ml), respectively, and could be applied to almost all the samples. However, NAA is not generally employed. The second electrochemical method uses an automated system but is a special apparatus just for determination of iodide. The first and third methods are time-consuming. 

Holzbecker and Ryan [825] determined these elements in seawater by neutron activation analysis after coprecipitation with lead phosphate. Lead phosphate gives no intense activities on irradiation, so it is a suitable matrix for trace metal determinations by neutron activation analysis. Precipitation of lead phosphate also brings down quantitatively the insoluble phosphates of silver (I), cadmium (II), chromium (III), copper (II), manganese (II), thorium (IV), uranium (VI), and zirconium (IV). Detection limits for each of these are given, and thorium and uranium determinations are described in detail. Gamma activity from 204Pb makes a useful internal standard to correct for geometry differences between samples, which for the lowest detection limits are counted close to the detector. 

Lieser et al. [628] studied the application of neutron activation analysis to the determination of trace elements in seawater, with particular reference to the limits of detection and reproducibility obtained for different elements when comparing various preliminary concentration techniques such as adsorption on charcoal, cellulose, and quartz, and complexing agents such as dithizone and sodium diethyldithiocarbamate. 

May et al. [73] used neutron activation analysis to determine 237neptunium in waste waters. The determination used the 237Np(rc,y)238Np reaction. The detection limit was 5 x 10 6 xg of 237neptunium, which corresponds to 2.5 x 10 6 xg/kg for 200 ml seawater samples. 

---