Acrylates, cyclohexyl addition

In a systematic study of the addition of cyclohexyl radicals to a-substi-tuted methyl acrylates, Giese (1983) has shown that the captodative-substituted example fits the linear correlation line of log with o-values as perfectly as the other cases studied. Thus, no special character of the captodative-substituted olefin is displayed. More recently, arylthiyl radicals have been added to disubstituted olefins in order to uncover a captodative effect in the rate data (Ito et aL, 1988). Even though a-A, A -dimethyl-aminoacrylonitrile reacts fastest in these additions, this observation cannot per se be interpreted as the manifestation of a captodative effect. Owing to the lack of rate data for the corresponding dicaptor- and didonor-substituted olefins, it is not possible to postulate a special captodative effect. The result confirms only that the A, A -dimethylamino-group, as expected from its a, -value, enhances the addition rate. In the sequence a-alkoxy-, a-chloro-, a-acetoxy- and a-methyl-substituted acrylonitriles, it reacts fastest. 

The simple addition reaction in Scheme 19 illustrates how the notation is used. Ester (1) can be dissected into synthons (2), (3) and (4). Synthons for radical precursors (pro-radicals) possess radical sites ( ) A reagent that is an appropriate radical precursor for the cyclohexyl radical, such as cyclohexyl iodide, is the actual equivalent of synthon (2). By nature, alkene acceptors have one site that reacts with a radical ( ) and one adjacent radical site ( ) that is created upon addition of a radical. Ethyl acrylate is a reagent that is equivalent to synthon (3). Atom or group donors are represented as sites that react with radicals ( ) Tributyltin hydride is a reagent equivalent of (4). In practice, such analysis will usually focus on carbon-carbon bond forming reactions and the atom transfer step may be omitted in the notation for simplicity. 

Pd-complexes have also been impregnated on an amorphous silica support vnth the aid of a solution containing [BM IMjlPFej dissolved in tetrahydrofuran and these systems were applied as highly efficient catalysts for promoting Mizoroki-Heck coupling reactions between various aryl halides and cyclohexyl acrylate in alkanes without the presence of additional ligand (Scheme 5.6-8) [105]. 

The use of monomethacrylates in anaerobic formulations was disclosed in a patent assigned to Loctite. Specifically mentioned were hydroxyethyl (XIX), hydroxypropyl (XX), cyclohexyl (XXI), tetrahydrofurfuryl (XXII), dimethylaminoethyl (XXIII), and glycidyl methacrylates (XXIV), and cyanoethyl acrylate [26]. Methacrylate esters containing residual carboxylic add groups were prepared by the reaction of hydroxyethyl methacrylate with phthalic anhydride (XXV), pyromellitic dianhydride (XXVI), and benzophenonetetracarboxylic add dianhydride (XXVII). The residual acid provided improved adhesion [27,28]. The reaction product of hydroxyalkylmethacrylates with maleic anhydride (XXVIII) also produced monomers with residual acid as well as additional curable unsaturation [29]. The dimethacrylates of the bisglycol esters of dicarboxylic adds were used to formulate anaerobic adhesives. Among the dicarboxylic acids mentioned were phthalic (XXIX), maleic (XXX), fumaric (XXXI), and malonic (XXXII) [30]. 

Chem. Descrip. Cyclohexyl methacrylate CAS 101-43-9 EINECS/ELINCS 202-943-5 Uses Acrylic for prod, of coatings, adhesives, sealants, lubricant additives, photographic reproductive toners, water treatment and textile chems. 

Poly(cyclohexyl acrylate) was shown to be miscible with PS with ucst behavior [720]. Random copolymers of cyclohexyl acrylate with n-butyl acrylate showed miscibility with PS above 50% cyclohexyl acrylate[721]. Poly(cyclohexyl methacrylate)/isotactic PS blends showed miscibility based on calorimetry and NMR studies [722]. The NMR results showed homogeneous behavior at a scale of 2.5-3.5 nm. Poly(4-trimethylsilyl styrene) miscibility with polyisoprene was observed with a lest behavior (critical temperature = 172 ° C at degree of polymerization of 370) [723]. The interaction parameter, showed the following relationship = 0.027—9.5/T. Isotactic and syndiotactic polystyrene both exhibit crystallinity, whereas atactic polystyrene is amorphous. Atactic PS/isotactic PS blends exhibited crystallization kinetics, which decreased linearly with atactic PS addition indicating miscibility [724]. The TgS of aPS and iPS are identical, thus Tg methods could not be employed to assess miscibility. Atactic PS/syndiotactic PS blends were also noted to be miscible with rejection of atactic PS in the interfibrillar region between the lamellar stacks of sPS [725]. 

---