Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Abundance analysis differential

In principle, mass spectrometry is not suitable to differentiate enantiomers. However, mass spectrometry is able to distinguish between diastereomers and has been applied to stereochemical problems in different areas of chemistry. In the field of chiral cluster chemistry, mass spectrometry, sometimes in combination with chiral chromatography, has been extensively applied to studies of proton- and metal-bound clusters, self-recognition processes, cyclodextrin and crown ethers inclusion complexes, carbohydrate complexes, and others. Several excellent reviews on this topic are nowadays available. A survey of the most relevant examples will be given in this section. Most of the studies was based on ion abundance analysis, often coupled with MIKE and CID ion fragmentation on MS " and FT-ICR mass spectrometric instruments, using Cl, MALDI, FAB, and ESI, and atmospheric pressure ionization (API) methods. [Pg.196]

Although a number of secondary minerals have been predicted to form in weathered CCB materials, few have been positively identified by physical characterization methods. Secondary phases in CCB materials may be difficult or impossible to characterize due to their low abundance and small particle size. Conventional mineral identification methods such as X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis fail to identify secondary phases that are less than 1-5% by weight of the CCB or are X-ray amorphous. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), coupled with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), can often identify phases not seen by XRD. Additional analytical methods used to characterize trace secondary phases include infrared (IR) spectroscopy, electron microprobe (EMP) analysis, differential thermal analysis (DTA), and various synchrotron radiation techniques (e.g., micro-XRD, X-ray absorption near-eidge spectroscopy [XANES], X-ray absorption fine-structure [XAFSJ). [Pg.642]

Abstract. Coronal abundances have been a subject of debate in the last years due to the availability of high-quality X-ray spectra of many cool stars. Coronal abundance determinations have generally been compared to solar photospheric abundances from this a number of general properties have been inferred, such as the presence of a coronal metal depletion with an inverse First Ionization Potential dependence, with a functional form dependent on the activity level. We report a detailed analysis of the coronal abundance of 4 stars with various levels of activity and with accurately known photospheric abundances. The coronal abundance is determined using a line flux analysis and a full determination of the differential emission measure. We show that, when coronal abundances are compared with real photospheric values for the individual stars, the resulting pattern can be very different some active stars with apparent Metal Abundance Deficiency in the corona have coronal abundances that are actually consistent with their photospheric counterparts. [Pg.78]

Abstract. The chemical composition of B 12, a Be star in the SMC cluster NGC 330, is analysed using high-resolution UVES/VLT spectra and the non-LTE model atmosphere code TLUSTY. A differential analysis relative to a SMC standard star AV 304 revealed (1) a general under-abundance of metals compared with that expected for the SMC, and (2) the lack of nitrogen enhancement. The former is attributed to the presence of a disk, and its contribution to the overall emission is estimated. Possible explanations for the lack of rotational mixing in the apparently rapidly rotating star are discussed. [Pg.140]

The results show that DE-MS alone provides evidence of the presence of the most abundant components in samples. On account of the relatively greater difficulty in the interpretation of DE-MS mass spectra, the use of multivariate analysis by principal component analysis (PCA) of DE-MS mass spectral data was used to rapidly differentiate triterpene resinous materials and to compare reference samples with archaeological ones. This method classifies the spectra and indicates the level of similarity of the samples. The output is a two- or three-dimensional scatter plot in which the geometric distances among the various points, representing the samples, reflect the differences in the distribution of ion peaks in the mass spectra, which in turn point to differences in chemical composition of... [Pg.90]

The first example of a dynamic flux analysis was a study performed in the 1960s [269]. In the yeast Candida utilis, the authors determined metabolic fluxes via the amino acid synthesis network by applying a pulse with 15N-labeled ammonia and chasing the label with unlabeled ammonia. Differential equations were then used to calculate the isotope abundance of intermediates in these pathways, with unknown rate values fitted to experimental data. In this way, the authors could show that only glutamic acid and glutamine-amide receive their nitrogen atoms directly from ammonia, to then pass it on to the other amino acids. [Pg.163]

Spectral analysis shows quite clearly that the various types of atoms are exactly the same on Earth as in the sky, in my own hand or in the hand of Orion. Stars are material objects, in the baryonic sense of the term. All astrophysical objects, apart from a noteworthy fraction of the dark-matter haloes, all stars and gaseous clouds are undoubtedly composed of atoms. However, the relative proportions of these atoms vary from one place to another. The term abundance is traditionally used to describe the quantity of a particular element relative to the quantity of hydrogen. Apart from this purely astronomical definition, the global criterion of metallicity has been defined with a view to chemical differentiation of various media. Astronomers abuse the term metaT by applying it to all elements heavier than helium. They reserve the letter Z for the mass fraction of elements above helium in a given sample, i.e. the percentage of metals by mass contained in 1 g of the matter under consideration. (Note that the same symbol is used for the atomic number, i.e. the number of protons in the nucleus. The context should distinguish which is intended.)... [Pg.53]

In a more modified approach, differential display proteomics can also be done with no separation of proteins. This is called the protein chip approach. In this method, a variety of bait proteins such as antibodies, peptides, or protein fragments may be immobilized in an array format on specially treated surfaces. The surface is then probed with the samples of interest. Proteins that bind to the relevant target can then be analyzed by direct MALDI readout of the bound material (Nelson, 1997 Davies et ah, 1999). Lor example, well-characterized antibodies can be used as bait. Protein samples from two different cell states are then labeled by different fluorophores, mixed together, and used as probe. In such a case, the fluorescent color acts as an indicator for any change in the abundance of the protein that remains bound to the chip (Lueking et ah, 1999). A number of technical problems would still need to be overcome before applying this technique for large-scale analysis of proteins. [Pg.80]

Another antibiotic that may cause problems in the interpretation of butylated acylcarnitines is cefotaxime (Fig. 3.2.5d) [63]. This antibiotic, or metabolites thereof, reveals itself by acylcarnitine analysis at m/z 470, which is otherwise considered to represent the monounsaturated form of 3-hydroxy hexadecenoylcarnitine (Ci i-OH). In poorly resolved scans this may be difficult to differentiate from m/z 472, which is a marker for LCHAD and TFP deficiencies. However, whereas m/z 472 (C16-OH) is more abundant than C16 1-OH in these FAO disorders, the profile of a patient treated with cefotaxime usually reveals an m/z 470 to m/z 472 ratio that is greater than 1. Furthermore, and in contrast to cefotaxime treatment, both LCHAD and TFP deficiencies are usually accompanied by elevations of other long-chain species (Table 3.2.1) [57]. [Pg.185]


See other pages where Abundance analysis differential is mentioned: [Pg.59]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.1028]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.875]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.60 , Pg.69 , Pg.70 ]




SEARCH



Abundance analysis

Differential analysis

© 2024 chempedia.info