Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Absorption measurements, comparison

ABP = 2-amino-5-bromophenyl(pyridin-2-yl)methanone 226,227 Absorbance, determination of 31 Absorption, measurement of 9,17,31 molar coefficient 36, 40 quantitative relationship 35, 36 recording of spectra 30, 31 -bathochromic/hypsochromic shift 31 -comparison to spectra of solutions 31 scanning curves 17,31,32 ACB = 2-amino-5-chlorobenzophenone 227... [Pg.231]

Fig. 4. Comparison of hydrogen content measurements. The curves show IR absorption measurements, using absorption cross sections of Brodsky el al., and Fang el al., whose absolute calibration was done by NRA, and total hydrogen measurements using 15N nuclear reaction. Note the discrepancy that arises at high hydrogen pressures, because of the presence of hydrogen that is not infrared active. (Reprinted with permission from the American Institute of Physics, Ross, R., Tsong, I.S.T., Messier, R., Lanford., W., Burman, C (1982). J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 20, 406.)... Fig. 4. Comparison of hydrogen content measurements. The curves show IR absorption measurements, using absorption cross sections of Brodsky el al., and Fang el al., whose absolute calibration was done by NRA, and total hydrogen measurements using 15N nuclear reaction. Note the discrepancy that arises at high hydrogen pressures, because of the presence of hydrogen that is not infrared active. (Reprinted with permission from the American Institute of Physics, Ross, R., Tsong, I.S.T., Messier, R., Lanford., W., Burman, C (1982). J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 20, 406.)...
It is apparent that the subject of water and fat absorption by plant proteins is characterized and complicated by interrelatedness. The study of relationships is important and is complicated by problems of measurement comparisons between studies are hindered by the variety of methods and conditions... [Pg.197]

Under normal conditions (e.g. 10 mA) with the sample in the flame, a global measurement of background absorption and absorption by the element is obtained. However, under strained lamp conditions (e.g. 500 mA), only background absorption is measured. Comparison of both measurements allows the calculation of absorption due only to the analyte. [Pg.267]

The comparison of spectral line shapes computed on the basis of the ab initio dipole surface of He-Ar with absorption measurements has demonstrated the soundness of the data. The agreement indicates that exchange effects due to intra-atomic correlation and higher-order dispersion terms contribute significantly to the induced dipole. However,... [Pg.162]

A comparison of reflectance and transmission in absorption measurements is of interest... [Pg.31]

Comparison of concentration measurements made by saturation fluorescence and absorption measurements. See the text for details. [Pg.55]

At best, this approach provides a quantitative index to solvent polarity, from which absolute or relative values of rate or equilibrium constants for many reactions, as well as absorption maxima in various solvents, can be derived. Since they reflect the complete picture of all the intermolecular forces acting in solution, these empirical parameters constitute a more comprehensive measure of the polarity of a solvent than any other single physical constant. In applying these solvent polarity parameters, however, it is tacitly assumed that the contribution of intermolecular forces in the interaction between the solvent and the standard substrate is the same as in the interaction between the solvent and the substrate of interest. This is obviously true only for closely related solvent-sensitive processes. Therefore, an empirical solvent scale based on a particular reference process is not expected to be universal and useful for all kinds of reactions and absorptions. Any comparison of the effect of solvent on a process of interest with a solvent polarity parameter is, in fact, a comparison with a reference process. [Pg.390]

By direct absorption measurements, we have directly probed the low frequency collective motions of proteins in water by terahertz absorption spectroscopy. We have isolated, for the first time, the 0.075 - 3.72 THz absorption of bovine semm albumin " and hen egg white lysozyme in water, and made direct comparison with existing... [Pg.87]

The absorbance (log 7()/i) and therefore the concentration of e q increased with increasing density of absorbed photons as measured immediately after the laser flash (Fig. 9.18). Since the extinction coefficient is well known, the concentration could easily be determined from absorption measurements. In comparison, the absorption of holes trapped at the particle surface is also shown in Fig. 9.18. The latter has a spectrum peaking around 600 nm and has a long lifetime (>1 ms), and was obtained after the eaq absorption had been quenched by adding acetone to the solution. Details are given in ref. [54]. The absorption of the trapped holes saturates at higher intensities. The holes were probably used in an anodic corrosion reaction. [Pg.282]

As absorption measurements are always made by comparison with a standard solution, and both the sample and the standard are placed in identical cells, the part of radiation denoted as f is constant and may be neglected. [Pg.28]

Atomic absorption measurements were carried out by Galbraith Laboratories, Inc. These are plotted in Figure 3. In general, both methods are in excellent agreement with the predicted results. The x-ray results show that a solid solution exists across the whole range of composition of x in Fe2 xCrx(Mo04)3, rather than any mixture of phases. Independent comparison of both sets of results with the theoretical values for each compound shows the x-ray results to be the closest to the predicted values, with a typical accuracy of 1 per cent compared to an estimated + 3 per cent for the atomic absorption measurements. [Pg.108]

The best way to obtain a thorough grounding in the practical operation of a TLC scanner is to attend a seminar presented by the manufactmer. Only in this way can one really understand the scope and limitations of the equipment and be able to use one s own scaimer in an assured and reliable fashion. The two following Sections give an example of an absorption measurement and a fluorescence measurement respectively, and these are followed by a comparison of a parallel with a transverse measurement. But first we give a few more... [Pg.155]

Table 7.19. Comparisons of the spacings (meV) of the ground-state sublevels of the (Bes,Bei) IBE in silicon obtained by the near-IR and induced far-IR absorption measurements (after [175])... Table 7.19. Comparisons of the spacings (meV) of the ground-state sublevels of the (Bes,Bei) IBE in silicon obtained by the near-IR and induced far-IR absorption measurements (after [175])...
DLTS measurements on Schottky structures containing TDD+s show an electron emission peak vs temperature corresponding to an ionization energy of 0.15 eV, this corresponds to the emission from the first TDDi+ [80], as can be checked from a comparison with Table 6.23. The results of DLTS measurements on the TDD+s under stress are consistent with the IR absorption measurement ([79] and references therein). From the DLTS principles, electronic reorientation between different orientations of the centres can occur through the CB, which is not possible directly in the absorption measurements. This allows determination of the ground state splitting, and a value of the shear DP of 9eV is obtained, not far from 8.8 eV derived from the piezospectroscopic measurements [123]. [Pg.372]

Atomic absorption measurements taken in water samples were also given for comparison in Table 3. The analytical value of total iron in water is slightly in good agreement with that obtained by the AAS method. The results obtained show that the propwsed method can be applied in the determination of iron (II) and total iron content in the water samples without... [Pg.427]

The proposed method was ap>phed in the determination of total iron in river and seawater samples. Iron(III) and total iron were determined according to the FIA procedure as described in the experimental section. The results obtained by both, standard addition and calibration curve, methods were in good agreement with each other. Atomic absorption measurements taken in water samples 1 and 2 are also given for comparison (Table 5). [Pg.432]


See other pages where Absorption measurements, comparison is mentioned: [Pg.243]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.822]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.198]   


SEARCH



Absorption comparison

Measurable absorption

© 2024 chempedia.info