Abatement methods absorption

The Figures 6.4.23 and 6.4.24 show, respectively, flow schemes of a singlepressure plant with SCR and a dual-pressure plant with extended absorption. Both NO abatement methods are interchangeable. 

In an economic comparison of these three common abatement systems, a 1991 EPA study (58) indicates extended absorption to be the most cost-effective method for NO removal, with selective reduction only matching its performance for small-capacity plants of about 200—250 t/d. Nonselective abatement systems were indicated to be the least cost-effective method of abatement. The results of any comparison depend on the cost of capital versus variable operating costs. A low capital cost for SCR is offset by the ammonia required to remove the NO. Higher tail gas NO... 

Based on established isotope uses, on the projected increase in the pollution problem, and on the apparent social and economic pressure for pollution abatement, a significant demand for enriched isotopes appears to be developing for the assessment and control of air, water, and soil pollutants. Isotopic techniques will be used in combination with conventional methods of detection and measurement, such as gas chromatography, x-ray fluorescence, and atomic absorption. Recent advances in economical isotope separation methods, instrumentation, and methodology promise to place isotopic technology within the reach of most research and industrial institutions. Increased application of isotope techniques appears most likely to occur in areas where data are needed to characterize the movement, behavior, and fate of pollutants in the environment. 

Lead detection kits are useful as a quick check for screening areas for lead abatement. A positive response is evidence of the presence of lead or a positive interference. A negative response, however, is not conclusive evidence of the absence of lead. The test provides presumptive evidence for the presence of lead, not its absence. A more thorough determination may need to be performed by a quantitative laboratory analysis of any representative bulk material available to substantiate the absence of lead. Samples are analyzed for lead at OSHA s Salt Lake Technical Center (SLTC) using OSHA methods ID-121 with Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS), ID-125 G with Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP), or ID-206 (Solders by ICP). If necessary, lower limits of detection for lead may be achieved using ICP Mass Spectrometer procedures. 

---