Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Window calculation

DEREK for Windows calculates log Kp in cm/h using a modified Potts and Guy equation ... [Pg.208]

Incident radiation at the wall Operation Measured by actinometry (potassium ferrioxalate) 100% (without filters) 7.55 X 10 Einstein cm s (at each window) Calculated with a superficial emission model... [Pg.268]

Windows comes with a tool that can help you convert decimal numbers to hex or binary numbers and back again. That tool is the Windows Calculator. When set to scientific mode, it is a great tool for doing the conversions. [Pg.26]

In most clinical situations, drugs are administered in a series of repetitive doses or as a continuous infusion to maintain a steady-state concentration of drug associated with the therapeutic window. Calculation of the appropriate maintenance dosage is a primary goal. To maintain the chosen steady-state or target concentration, the rate of drug administration is adjusted such that... [Pg.13]

We will now illustrate the effect of the re-ordering on M-D signal storage requirements. The requirements can be computed per signal by using the window calculation method [28]. [Pg.154]

When the authors see a student s calculation of a physical problem made in Mathcad without units it is analogous to situations when one writes calculations in Word types formulas there and calculates manually, on Windows calculator (see Fig. 6.2) or often on the single one lying not far from computer keyboard. [Pg.253]

To verify the modelling of the data eolleetion process, calculations of SAT 4, in the entrance window of the XRII was compared to measurements of RNR p oj in stored data as function of tube potential. The images object was a steel cylinder 5-mm) with a glass rod 1-mm) as defect. X-ray spectra were filtered with 0.6-mm copper. Tube current and exposure time were varied so that the signal beside the object. So, was kept constant for all tube potentials. Figure 8 shows measured and simulated SNR oproj, where both point out 100 kV as the tube potential that gives a maximum. Due to overestimation of the noise in calculations the maximum in the simulated values are normalised to the maximum in the measured values. Once the model was verified it was used to calculate optimal choice of filter materials and tube potentials, see figure 9. [Pg.212]

Calculate the H—H bond length in ground-state H2 using the STO-3G basis set in the GAUSSIAN for Windows implementation. [Pg.300]

Calculate the pressure drop for on ideal window section. If (WrJ, > 100. [Pg.1040]

The cross-sections of the conductor and the enclosure arc then checked for their adequacy to dissipate the heat generated. The cross-section is then adjusted suitably by permuialions and combinations to arrive at the most appropriate size, keeping in mind the available extruded sections, accounting for all such factors that may affect the rating or the fatilt level of the enclosure and the conductor, such as tap-offs, which are subjected to a cumulative faull level, openings in the conductor for heat dissipation or the enclosure for inspection windows that can infhience their ratings. A calculation in Example 31.1 will clarify the procedure to establish the size of the... [Pg.943]

Test data are available for two experiments at different impact velocities in this configuration. In one of the tests the projectile impact velocity was 1.54 km/s, while in the second the impact velocity was 2.10 km/s. This test was simulated with the WONDY [60] one-dimensional Lagrangian wave code, and Fig. 9.21 compares calculated and measured particle velocity histories at the sample/window interface for the two tests [61]. Other test parameters are listed at the top of each plot in the figure. [Pg.343]

When you write on a blackboard with chalk, you are not unduly inconvenienced if 3 pieces in 10 break while you are using it but if 1 in 2 broke, you might seek an alternative supplier. So the failure probability, Pf, of 0.3 is acceptable (just barely). If the component were a ceramic cutting tool, a failure probability of 1 in 100 (Pf= 10 ) might be acceptable, because a tool is easily replaced. But if it were the window of a vacuum system, the failure of which can cause injury, one might aim for a Pf of lO and for a ceramic protective tile on the re-entry vehicle of a space shuttle, when one failure in any one of 10,000 tiles could be fatal, you might calculate that a Pf of 10 was needed. [Pg.185]

The material properties of window glass are summarised in Table 18.1. To use these data to calculate a safe design load, we must assign an acceptable failure probability to the window, and decide on its design life. Failure could cause injury, so the window is a critical component we choose a failure probability of 10The vacuum system is designed for intermittent use and is seldom under vacuum for more than 1 hour, so the design life under load is 1000 hours. [Pg.191]

This operating window is quantified or rated by the term Suction Specific Speed, Nss . The Nss is calculated with three parameters, the speed, the flow rate, and the NPSHr. These numbers come from the pump s performance curve, discussed in Chapter 7. The formula is the following ... [Pg.67]

Figure 9 Treating internal dynamics during the refinement process. Due to dynamics and the weighting of the NOE, the measured distance may appear much shorter than the average distance. This can be accounted for by using ensemble refinement techniques. In contrast to standard refinement, an average distance is calculated over an ensemble of C structures (ensemble refinement) or a trajectory (time-averaged refinement). The time-averaged distance is defined with an exponential window over the trajectory. T is the total length over the trajectory, t is the time, and x is a relaxation time characterizing the width of the exponential window. Figure 9 Treating internal dynamics during the refinement process. Due to dynamics and the weighting of the NOE, the measured distance may appear much shorter than the average distance. This can be accounted for by using ensemble refinement techniques. In contrast to standard refinement, an average distance is calculated over an ensemble of C structures (ensemble refinement) or a trajectory (time-averaged refinement). The time-averaged distance is defined with an exponential window over the trajectory. T is the total length over the trajectory, t is the time, and x is a relaxation time characterizing the width of the exponential window.
Thompson and Goldstein [89] improve on the calculations of Stolorz et al. by including the secondary structure of the entire window rather than just a central position and then sum over all secondary strucmre segment types with a particular secondary structure at the central position to achieve a prediction for this position. They also use information from multiple sequence alignments of proteins to improve secondary structure prediction. They use Bayes rule to fonnulate expressions for the probability of secondary structures, given a multiple alignment. Their work describes what is essentially a sophisticated prior distribution for 6 i(X), where X is a matrix of residue counts in a multiple alignment in a window about a central position. The PDB data are used to form this prior, which is used as the predictive distribution. No posterior is calculated with posterior = prior X likelihood. [Pg.339]

Fig. 4.24. Fraction of transmitted X-rays calculated for EDXS detectors with windowless Si(Li) and Gecrystals, and for different windows. Fig. 4.24. Fraction of transmitted X-rays calculated for EDXS detectors with windowless Si(Li) and Gecrystals, and for different windows.
After eleven iterations, hinfopt identifies that 7 in equation (9.176) has a best value of 0.13. The command sigma calculates the data for a singular value Bode diagram as shown in Figures 9.32, 9.34 and 9.35. Other information printed in the command window is given below... [Pg.416]


See other pages where Window calculation is mentioned: [Pg.1409]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.1409]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.1409]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.1409]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.737]    [Pg.868]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.594]    [Pg.601]    [Pg.629]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.729]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.373]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.154 ]




SEARCH



Example Calculations for Developing Operating Window

© 2024 chempedia.info