Wave function classes

We note that it is possible to combine the method with correlation factor with the method using superposition of configurations to obtain any accuracy desired by means of comparatively simple wave functions. For a very general class of functions g(r12), one can develop the quotient (r r2)lg(r12) according to Eq. III.2 into products of one-electron functions y>k(r), which leads to the expansion... 

A final example is the concept of QM state. It is often stated that the wave function must be square integrable because the modulus square of the wave function is a probability distribution. States in QM are rays in Hilbert space, which are equivalence classes of wave functions. The equivalence relation between two wave functions is that one wave function is equal to the other multiplied by a complex number. The space of QM states is then a projective space, which by an infinite stereographic projection is isomorphic to a sphere in Hilbert space with any radius, conventionally chosen as one. Hence states can be identified with normalized wave functions as representatives from each equivalence class. This fact is important for the probability interpretation, but it is not a consequence of the probability interpretation. 

Figure 18. Complete unwinding of an encircling nuclear wave function >0 by mapping onto higher cover spaces, (a) The function in the single space (b) e in the double space (c) 4 in the quadruple space (d) schematic picture of in a 2hn cover space. In each case, will be completely unwound if it contains contributions from Feynman paths belonging to (b) 2, (c) 4, and (d) h different winding-number classes.

Clearly, the above procedure can be continued (in principle) as many times as required. Thus, if the wave function includes n = —4 3 paths, we have simply to dehne the function I 4((t)) = —+ 8ti), and then map onto the (j) = 0 16ti cover space, which will unwind the function completely. In general, if there are h homotopy classes of Feynman paths that contribute to the Kernel, then one can unwind ihG by computing the unsymmetrised wave function ih in the 0 2hn cover space. The symmetry group of the latter will be a direct product of the symmetry group in the single space and the group... 

To clarify, the complete unwinding of the wave function is not required to explain the effect of the GP. The latter affects only the sign of the odd n Feynman paths with respect to the even n paths, and is thus explained completely once one has unwound these two classes of path by mapping onto the double space. The complete unwinding explains the interference within the even n and odd n contributions, by unwinding each of them further, into the contributions from individual values of n. 

In the cases other than [case A] and [case B), so called "open-shell SCF methods are employed. The orbital concept becomes not quite certain. The methods are divided into classes which are "restricted 18> and "unrestricted 19> Hartree-Fock procedures. In the latter case the wave function obtained is no longer a spin eigenfunction. 

Cl methods [21] add a certain number of excited Slater determinants, usually selected by the excitation type (e.g. single, double, triple excitations), which were initially not present in the CASSCF wave function, and treat them in a non-perturbative way. Inclusion of additional configurations allows for more degrees of freedom in the total wave function, thus improving its overall description. These methods are extremely costly and therefore, are only applicable to small systems. Among this class of methods, DDCI (difference-dedicated configuration interaction) [22] and CISD (single- and double excitations) [21] are the most popular. 

Only for a special class of compound with appropriate planar symmetry is it possible to distinguish between (a) electrons, associated with atomic cores and (7r) electrons delocalized over the molecular surface. The Hiickel approximation is allowed for this limited class only. Since a — 7r separation is nowhere perfect and always somewhat artificial, there is the temptation to extend the Hiickel method also to situations where more pronounced a — ix interaction is expected. It is immediately obvious that a different partitioning would be required for such an extension. The standard HMO partitioning that operates on symmetry grounds, treats only the 7r-electrons quantum mechanically and all a-electrons as part of the classical molecular frame. The alternative is an arbitrary distinction between valence electrons and atomic cores. Schemes have been devised [98, 99] to handle situations where the molecular valence shell consists of either a + n or only a electrons. In either case, the partitioning introduces extra complications. The mathematics of the situation [100] dictates that any abstraction produce disjoint sectors, of which no more than one may be non-classical. In view if the BO approximation already invoked, only the valence sector could be quantum mechanical9. In this case the classical remainder is a set of atomic cores in some unspecified excited state, called the valence state. One complication that arises is that wave functions of the valence electrons depend parametrically on the valence state. 

Of these three classes (ii) is most easily disposed of clearly if a co-ordinate q does not appear in H then we can anticipate that the variation process will be completely indifferent to symmetry classifications involving q. Unless, of course, the form of the trial function is chosen with these variationally phantom degrees of freedom in mind. In the case of electron spin the unrestricted solution of Eq. (22) would not therefore lead to a total wave function which is an eigenfunction of operators depending on spin co-ordinates. 

A class of partial differential equations first proposed by Erwin Schrodinger in 1926 to account for the so-called quantized wave behavior of molecules, atoms, nuclei, and electrons. Solutions to the Schrodinger equation are wave functions based on Louis de Broglie s proposal in 1924 that all matter has a dual nature, having properties of both particles and waves. These solutions are... 

Rommer, S., Ostlund, S. Class of ansatz wave functions for one-dimensional spin systems and their relation to the density matrix renormalization group. Phys. Rev. B 1997, 55(4), 2164. 

Another class of methods uses more than one Slater determinant as the reference wave function. The methods used to describe electron correlation within these calculations are similar in some ways to the methods listed above. These methods include multiconfigurational self-consistent field (MCSCF), multireference single and double configuration interaction (MRDCI), and /V-clcctron valence state perturbation theory (NEVPT) methods.5... 

A comparison of HF, MP2 and density functional methods in a system with Hartree-Fock wave function instabilities, ONO—OM (for M = Li, Na and K), shows that DFT methods are able to avoid the problems that ab initio methods have for this difficult class of molecules. The computed MP2 frequencies and IR intensities were more affected by instabilities than HF. The hybrid B3LYP functional reproduced the experimental frequencies most reliably. The cis,cis conformation of ONO—OM was highly preferred because of electrostatic attraction and was strongest in the case where M = Li. The small Li cation can fit in best in the planar five-membered ring. This is completely different from the nonionic... 

Quantum chemical methods may be divided into two classes wave function-based techniques and functionals of the density and its derivatives. In the former, a simple Hamiltonian describes the interactions while a hierarchy of wave functions of increasing complexity is used to improve the calculation. With this approach it is in principle possible to come arbitrarily close to the correct solution, but at the expense of interpretability of the wave function the molecular orbital concept loses meaning for correlated wave functions. In DFT on the other hand, the complexity is built into the energy expression, rather than in the wave function which can still be written similar to a simple single-determinant Hartree-Fock wave function. We can thus still interpret our results in terms of a simple molecular orbital picture when using a cluster model of the metal substrate, i.e., the surface represented by a suitable number of metal atoms. 

---