Molecular valence shell

Only for a special class of compound with appropriate planar symmetry is it possible to distinguish between (a) electrons, associated with atomic cores and (7r) electrons delocalized over the molecular surface. The Hiickel approximation is allowed for this limited class only. Since a — 7r separation is nowhere perfect and always somewhat artificial, there is the temptation to extend the Hiickel method also to situations where more pronounced a — ix interaction is expected. It is immediately obvious that a different partitioning would be required for such an extension. The standard HMO partitioning that operates on symmetry grounds, treats only the 7r-electrons quantum mechanically and all a-electrons as part of the classical molecular frame. The alternative is an arbitrary distinction between valence electrons and atomic cores. Schemes have been devised [98, 99] to handle situations where the molecular valence shell consists of either a + n or only a electrons. In either case, the partitioning introduces extra complications. The mathematics of the situation [100] dictates that any abstraction produce disjoint sectors, of which no more than one may be non-classical. In view if the BO approximation already invoked, only the valence sector could be quantum mechanical9. In this case the classical remainder is a set of atomic cores in some unspecified excited state, called the valence state. One complication that arises is that wave functions of the valence electrons depend parametrically on the valence state. 

All electrons in a molecule are to be treated as equivalent. The angular momentum, carried by some electrons becomes a shared property of the total molecular valence shell. For first-row elements the simple octet valence rules... 

Then, the molecular valence shell count of mth order is calculated as... 

Since the basis set is obtained from atomic calculations, it is still desirable to scale exponents for the molecular environment. This is accomplished by defining an inner valence scale factor and an outer valence scale factor ( double zeta ) and multiplying the corresponding inner and outer a s by the square of these factors. Only the valence shells are scaled. 

On the assumption that the pairs of electrons in the valency shell of a bonded atom in a molecule are arranged in a definite way which depends on the number of electron pairs (coordination number), the geometrical arrangement or shape of molecules may be predicted. A multiple bond is regarded as equivalent to a single bond as far as molecular shape is concerned. 

The major features of molecular geometry can be predicted on the basis of a quite simple principle—electron-pair repulsion. This principle is the essence of the valence-shell electron-pair repulsion (VSEPR) model, first suggested by N. V. Sidgwick and H. M. Powell in 1940. It was developed and expanded later by R. J. Gillespie and R. S. Nyholm. According to the VSEPR model, the valence electron pairs surrounding an atom repel one another. Consequently, the orbitals containing those electron pairs are oriented to be as far apart as possible. 

VSEPR model Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion model, used to predict molecular geometry states that electron pairs around a central atom tend to be as far apart as possible, 180-182... 

The Lewis structures encountered in Chapter 2 are two-dimensional representations of the links between atoms—their connectivity—and except in the simplest cases do not depict the arrangement of atoms in space. The valence-shell electron-pair repulsion model (VSEPR model) extends Lewis s theory of bonding to account for molecular shapes by adding rules that account for bond angles. The model starts from the idea that because electrons repel one another, the shapes of simple molecules correspond to arrangements in which pairs of bonding electrons lie as far apart as possible. Specifically ... 

In this section we start, as in valence-bond theory, with a simple molecule, H2, and in the following sections extend the same principles to more complex molecules and solids. In every case, molecular orbitals are built by adding together—the technical term is superimposing—atomic orbitals belonging to the valence shells of the atoms in the molecule. For example, a molecular orbital for Fi2 is... 

In the molecular orbital description of homonuclear diatomic molecules, we first build all possible molecular orbitals from the available valence-shell atomic orbitals. Then we accommodate the valence electrons in molecular orbitals by using the same procedure we used in the building-up principle for atoms (Section 1.13). That is,... 

Step 2 Use matching valence-shell atomic orbitals to build bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals and draw the resulting molecular orbital energy-level diagram (Figs. 3.31 and 3.32). 

Step 3 Note the total number of electrons present in the valence shells of the two atoms. If the species is an ion, adjust the number of electrons to account for the charge. Step.4 Accommodate the electrons in the molecular orbitals according to the building-up principle. 

Valence and oxidation state are directly related to the valence-shell electron configuration of a group. Binary hydrides are classified as saline, metallic, or molecular. Oxides of metals tend to be ionic and to form basic solutions in water. Oxides of nonmetals are molecular and many are the anhydrides of acids. 

Having introduced methane and the tetrahedron, we now begin a systematic coverage of the VSEPR model and molecular shapes. The valence shell electron pair repulsion model assumes that electron-electron repulsion determines the arrangement of valence electrons around each inner atom. This is accomplished by positioning electron pairs as far apart as possible. Figure 9-12 shows the optimal arrangements for two electron pairs (linear),... 

The molecular geometry of a complex depends on the coordination number, which is the number of ligand atoms bonded to the metal. The most common coordination number is 6, and almost all metal complexes with coordination number 6 adopt octahedral geometry. This preferred geometry can be traced to the valence shell electron pair repulsion (VSEPR) model Introduced In Chapter 9. The ligands space themselves around the metal as far apart as possible, to minimize electron-electron repulsion. 

The other approach to molecular geometry is the valence shell electron-pair repulsion (VSEPR) theory. This theory holds that... 

The electron density i/ (0)p at the nucleus primarily originates from the ability of s-electrons to penetrate the nucleus. The core-shell Is and 2s electrons make by far the major contributions. Valence orbitals of p-, d-, or/-character, in contrast, have nodes at r = 0 and cannot contribute to iA(0)p except for minor relativistic contributions of p-electrons. Nevertheless, the isomer shift is found to depend on various chemical parameters, of which the oxidation state as given by the number of valence electrons in p-, or d-, or /-orbitals of the Mossbauer atom is most important. In general, the effect is explained by the contraction of inner 5-orbitals due to shielding of the nuclear potential by the electron charge in the valence shell. In addition to this indirect effect, a direct contribution to the isomer shift arises from valence 5-orbitals due to their participation in the formation of molecular orbitals (MOs). It will be shown in Chap. 5 that the latter issue plays a decisive role. In the following section, an overview of experimental observations will be presented. 

In one respect the valence shell electron-pair repulsion theory is no better (and no worse) than other theories of molecular structure. Predictions can only be made when the constitution is known, i.e. when it is already known which and how many atoms are joined... 

To derive the values of the coefficients at, Ph y, and 8i so that the bond energy is maximized and the correct molecular structure results, the mutual interactions between the electrons have to be considered. This requires a great deal of computational expenditure. However, in a qualitative manner the interactions can be estimated rather well that is exactly what the valence shell electron-pair repulsion theory accomplishes. 

Before discussing the AIM theory, we describe in Chapters 4 and 5 two simple models, the valence shell electron pair (VSEPR) model and the ligand close-packing (LCP) model of molecular geometry. These models are based on a simple qualitative picture of the electron distribution in a molecule, particularly as it influenced by the Pauli principle. 

Figure 4.11 Molecular shapes based on the arrangements of two to six valence shell electron pairs.

---