Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Wave formulas

Dunkle s Syllabus (1957 58), 1-36 (Detonation phenomena, mathematical background) 37-60 (Initiation of shock waves formulas equations including Riemann equation, p 43 Hugoniot relations in gases, p 44 Rankine-Hugoniot equation, p 45 ... [Pg.617]

The phenomena of interference and diffraction of light cannot be understood without introducing the wave concept. In fact, the wave properties of light were established precisely from these phenomena. Here, we will introduce the essential aspects of a propagating wave and the formulae needed to explain the optical effects described throughout this section. Let us first recall the one dimensional wave formula that we met for the first time during the physics classes in senior high school. [Pg.11]

If we transform ef into a Taylor s series as a regular function, we can prove Eq. (1.6). This lecture on analytic functions went on like this The polar form of z with z = r and arg(z) = 0 is z = reie." Here we transform Eq. (1.5) by using the polar form. If we overlook the strictly critical study of the argument 6, we obtain the general formula of a plane wave, using the correspondence r = A and d=(kr- (at). In physics, the following equation is always used as the wave formula. This is done to take advantage of the ease with which complex exponentials can be manipulated. Only if we want to represent the actual wave must we take the real part into account. [Pg.12]

In this section, two illustrative numerical results, obtained by means of the described reconstruction algorithm, are presented. Input data are calculated in the frequency range of 26 to 38 GHz using matrix formulas [8], describing the reflection of a normally incident plane wave from the multilayered half-space. [Pg.130]

Side drilled holes are widely used as reference reflectors, especially when angle beam probes are used (e.g. for weld testing). However, the distance law of side drilled holes is different to that of a flat bottomed hole. In the literature [2] a conversion formula is given which allows to convert the diameter of a side drilled hole into the diameter of a flat bottomed hole and vice versa, valid in the far field only, and for diameters greater than 1.5 times the wave length. In practical application this formula can be used down to approximately one nearfield length, without making big mistakes. Fig. 2 shows curves recorded from real flat bottomed holes, and the uncorrected and corrected DGS curves. [Pg.814]

IHP) (the Helmholtz condenser formula is used in connection with it), located at the surface of the layer of Stem adsorbed ions, and an outer Helmholtz plane (OHP), located on the plane of centers of the next layer of ions marking the beginning of the diffuse layer. These planes, marked IHP and OHP in Fig. V-3 are merely planes of average electrical property the actual local potentials, if they could be measured, must vary wildly between locations where there is an adsorbed ion and places where only water resides on the surface. For liquid surfaces, discussed in Section V-7C, the interface will not be smooth due to thermal waves (Section IV-3). Sweeney and co-workers applied gradient theory (see Chapter III) to model the electric double layer and interfacial tension of a hydrocarbon-aqueous electrolyte interface [27]. [Pg.179]

Likewise, a basis set can be improved by uncontracting some of the outer basis function primitives (individual GTO orbitals). This will always lower the total energy slightly. It will improve the accuracy of chemical predictions if the primitives being uncontracted are those describing the wave function in the middle of a chemical bond. The distance from the nucleus at which a basis function has the most significant effect on the wave function is the distance at which there is a peak in the radial distribution function for that GTO primitive. The formula for a normalized radial GTO primitive in atomic units is... [Pg.234]

Water Hammer When hquid flowing in a pipe is suddenly decelerated to zero velocity by a fast-closing valve, a pressure wave propagates upstream to the pipe inlet, where it is reflected a pounding of the hne commonly known as water hammer is often produced. For an instantaneous flow stoppage of a truly incompressible fluid in an inelastic pipe, the pressure rise would be infinite. Finite compressibility of the flmd and elasticity of the pipe limit the pressure rise to a finite value. The Joukowstd formula gives the maximum pressure... [Pg.670]

The numerator gives the wave velocity for perfec tly rigid pipe, and the denominator corrects for waU elasticity. This formula is for thin-walled pipes for thick-walled pipes, the factor D/b is replaced by... [Pg.670]

The expansion coefficients determine the first-order correction to the perturbed wave function (eq. (4.35)), and they can be calculated for the known unperturbed wave functions and energies. The coefficient in front of 4>o for 4 i cannot be determined from the above formula, but the assumption of intermediate normalization (eq. (4.30)) makes Co = 0. [Pg.125]

The formulas for higher-order conections become increasingly complex. The main point, however, is that all corrections can be expressed in terms of matrix elements of the perturbation operator over the unperturbed wave functions, and the unperturbed energies. [Pg.126]

The formula for the first-order correction to the wave function (eq. (4.37)) similarly only contains contributions from doubly excited determinants. Since knowledge of the first-order wave function allows calculation of the energy up to third order (In - - 1 = 3, eq. (4.34)), it is immediately clear that the third-order energy also only contains contributions from doubly excited determinants. Qualitatively speaking, the MP2 contribution describes the correlation between pairs of electrons while MP3 describes the interaction between pairs. The formula for calculating this contribution is somewhat... [Pg.128]

In such cases the expression from fii st-order perturbation theory (10.18) yields a result identical to the first derivative of the energy with respect to A. For wave functions which are not completely optimized with respect to all parameters (Cl, MP or CC), the Hellmann-Feynman theorem does not hold, and a first-order property calculated as an expectation value will not be identical to that obtained as an energy derivative. Since the Hellmann-Feynman theorem holds for an exact wave function, the difference between the two values becomes smaller as the quality of an approximate wave function increases however, for practical applications the difference is not negligible. It has been argued that the derivative technique resembles the physical experiment more, and consequently formula (10.21) should be preferred over (10.18). [Pg.241]

If the perturbation is a homogeneous electric field F, the perturbation operator P i (eq. (10.17)) is the position vector r and P2 is zero. As.suming that the basis functions are independent of the electric field (as is normally the case), the first-order HF property, the dipole moment, from the derivative formula (10.21) is given as (since an HF wave function obeys the Hellmann-Feynman theorem)... [Pg.247]

Since geometry derivatives are important for optimizing geometries, it may be useful to look in more detail at the quantities involved in calculating first and second derivatives of an HF wave function. Such formulas are most easily derived directly from the HF energy expressed in terms of the atomic quantities (eq. (3.53). ... [Pg.253]

Newton (1686) first calculated the velocity of propagation of a compressional wave of permanent type in an elastic medium, and arrived at the general formula ... [Pg.146]

The main characteristics which determine the performance of a wavefront corrector are the number of actuators, actuator stroke and the temporal response. The number of actuators will determine the maximum Strehl ratio which can be obtained with the AO system. The price of a deformable mirror is directly related to the number of actuators. The actuator stroke should be enough to compensate wavefront errors when the seeing is moderately poor. This can be derived from the Noll formula with ao = 1.03. For example, on a 10m telescope with ro = 0.05m at 0.5 m, the rms wavefront error is 6.7 /xm. The deformable mirror stroke should be a factor of at least three times this. It should also include some margin for correction of errors introduced by the telescope itself. The required stroke is too large for most types of deformable mirror, and it is common practice to off-load the tip-tilt component of the wave-front error to a separate tip-tilt mirror. The Noll coefficient a2 = 0.134 and... [Pg.192]

It should be noted that to use the above time-domain formulas for computing rates, one would need an efficient means of propagating wave packets on the neutral and anion surfaces, and one, specifically, that would be valid for longer times than are needed in the optical spectroscopy case. Why Because, in the non-BO situation, the product is multiplied by exp(iEtZh) and then integrated over time. In the spectroscopy case, is multiplied by... [Pg.305]

A greater gain in accuracy in connection with the temperature wave depends significantly on how well we calculate the coefficients a (v). In the case where k = k u is a power function of temperature, numerical experiments showed that formula (38) is useless and formula (36) is much more flexible than (37), so there is some reason to be concerned about this. Further comparison of schemes (34) and (35) should cause some difficulties. Both schemes are absolutely stable and have the same error of approximation 0 r + h ). The scheme a) is linear with respect to the value of the function on the layer and so the value y7+i on every new layer... [Pg.520]

Section IIC showed how a scattering wave function could be computed via Fourier transformation of the iterates q k). Related arguments can be applied to detailed formulas for S matrix elements and reaction probabilities [1, 13]. For example, the total reaction probability out of some state consistent with some given set of initial quantum numbers, 1= j2,h), is [13, 17]... [Pg.16]

Clearly, in OCT the Hamiltonian is intrinsically time dependent and this form of the solution is not valid for large t values. We can, however, use the formula to propagate the wave function forward by a small time interval 8f. [Pg.65]


See other pages where Wave formulas is mentioned: [Pg.16]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.807]    [Pg.808]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.871]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.175]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.11 ]




SEARCH



General Formula of Wave

Kirchhoff integral formula for reverse-time wave equation migration

© 2024 chempedia.info