Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Viscosity-Diffusivity Relationships

One generally thinks of the viscosity of a fluid as something to do with its stickiness or its ability to resist shear-induced flow. Consider two parallel plates with area A separated by distance y. If the top plate moves with velocity v, force is transmitted to the other plate by the fluid between them. The force per area, which is also the shear stress S , is given by [Pg.286]

The viscosity of a low density gas can be computed from the theory of an ideal gas and is given by [Pg.287]

Things are quite different for condensed phases when molecules carmot move independently from each other. The Stokes-Einstem equation relates the diffusion coefficient to the viscosity of a fluid  [Pg.287]


We note that all the equations between Eqs. 5.8a and 5.16, except Eq. 5.14 assume the diffusion coefficient to be inversely proportional to the viscosity. This relationship does not seem to hold with viscous solvents ( / larger than 20 cP), for which a proportionality to seems to give better results [5]. However, such highly viscous solutions are of little interest as mobile phases in liquid chromatography... [Pg.227]

Fox TG, Floiy PJ (1948) Viscosity-molecular weight and viscosity- temperature relationships for polystyrene and polyisobutylene. J Am Chem Soc 70 2384—2395 Frischknecht AL, Milner ST (2000) Diffusion with contour length fluctuations in linear polymer melts. Macromolecules 33 5273-5277... [Pg.92]

While for a long time individual workers in this field favored a given method of investigation and tended to stress the importance of their results, it is now essential to apply all the available methods simultaneously, and to attaich particular weight to results which confirm and are complementary to one another. While previously in the field of high polymers it was possible to be satisfied with a few, more or less empirical relationships and rules, it appears necessary and possible today to visualize the extension of many of the more exact laws of physical chemistry—vapor pressure, osmosis, viscosity, diffusion, kinetics of reaction, etc.—and thus to incorporate the chemistry of the high polymers securely in the fundamentals of our science. [Pg.370]

We now focus on the Stokes Einstein relation, which relates the self-diffusion coefficient D, viscosity t], and temperature T as D cc T/t] and which is known to be accurate for normai and high temperature liquids. Since (rr) is proportional to the viscosity, the relationship between D and (tt) is examined in the inset of Fig. 10, which shows quantity D(vy)/T as a function of T. [Pg.229]

The diffusion of mesoscopic spheres in simple fluids that are not highly viscous is governed by the shear viscosity q. Relationships between q, 0, and 0f appear in Figures 5a and Sb, which plot 0q and 0,q as functions of c. Viscosities were taken from an independent study by Phillies and Quinlan (22). [Pg.308]

This concludes our discussion of the viscosity of polymer solutions per se, although various aspects of the viscous resistance to particle motion continue to appear in the remainder of the chapter. We began this chapter by discussing the intrinsic viscosity and the friction factor for rigid spheres. Now that we have developed the intrinsic viscosity well beyond that first introduction, we shall do the same (more or less) for the friction factor. We turn to this in the next section, considering the relationship between the friction factor and diffusion. [Pg.621]

Rheology. Flow properties of latices are important during processing and in many latex appHcations such as dipped goods, paint, inks (qv), and fabric coatings. For dilute, nonionic latices, the relative latex viscosity is a power—law expansion of the particle volume fraction. The terms in the expansion account for flow around the particles and particle—particle interactions. For ionic latices, electrostatic contributions to the flow around the diffuse double layer and enhanced particle—particle interactions must be considered (92). A relative viscosity relationship for concentrated latices was first presented in 1972 (93). A review of empirical relative viscosity models is available (92). In practice, latex viscosity measurements are carried out with rotational viscometers (see Rpleologicalmeasurement). [Pg.27]

As in die case of die diffusion properties, die viscous properties of die molten salts and slags, which play an important role in die movement of bulk phases, are also very stiiicture-seiisitive, and will be refeiTed to in specific examples. For example, die viscosity of liquid silicates are in die range 1-100 poise. The viscosities of molten metals are very similar from one metal to anodier, but die numerical value is usually in die range 1-10 centipoise. This range should be compared widi die familiar case of water at room temperature, which has a viscosity of one centipoise. An empirical relationship which has been proposed for die temperature dependence of die viscosity of liquids as an AiTlienius expression is... [Pg.323]

Since thermal agitation is the common origin of transport properties, it gives rise to several relationships among them, for example, the Nemst-Einstein relation between diffusion and conductivity, or the Stokes-Einstein relation between diffusion and viscosity. Although transport... [Pg.120]

Equations (29), (30), and (10) might be applied to the elucidation of the frictional coefficient in a manner paralleling the procedure applied to the intrinsic viscosity. One should then determine/o (from sedimentation or from diffusion measurements extrapolated to infinite dilution) in a -solvent in order to find the value of Kf, and so forth. Instead of following this procedure, one may compare observed frictional coefficients with intrinsic viscosities, advantage being taken of the relationships already established for the viscosity. Eliminating from Eqs. (18) and (23) we obtain ... [Pg.627]

Accurate interpretation of the formation properties (porosity, permeability and irreducible water saturation) requires reliable estimates of NMR fluid properties or the relationship between diffusivity and relaxation time. Estimation of oil viscosity and solution-gas content require their correlation with NMR measurable fluid properties. These include the hydrogen index, bulk fluid relaxation time and bulk fluid diffusivity [8]. [Pg.324]

The side-by-side diffusion cell has also been calibrated for drug delivery mass transport studies using polymeric membranes [12], The mass transport coefficient, D/h, was evaluated with diffusion data for benzoic acid in aqueous solutions of polyethylene glycol 400 at 37°C. By varying the polyethylene glycol 400 content incrementally from 0 to 40%, the kinematic viscosity of the diffusion medium, saturation solubility for benzoic acid, and diffusivity of benzoic acid could be varied. The resulting mass transport coefficients, D/h, were correlated with the Sherwood number (Sh), Reynolds number (Re), and Schmidt number (Sc) according to the relationships... [Pg.109]

By inspection, the flux is directly proportional to the solubility to the first power and directly proportional to the diffusion coefficient to the two-thirds power. If, for example, the proposed study involves mass transport measurements for series of compounds in which the solubility and diffusion coefficient change incrementally, then the flux is expected to follow this relationship when the viscosity and stirring rate are held constant. This model allows the investigator to simulate the flux under a variety of conditions, which may be useful in planning experiments or in estimating the impact of complexation, self-association, and other physicochemical phenomena on mass transport. [Pg.118]

One of the most popular applications of molecular rotors is the quantitative determination of solvent viscosity (for some examples, see references [18, 23-27] and Sect. 5). Viscosity refers to a bulk property, but molecular rotors change their behavior under the influence of the solvent on the molecular scale. Most commonly, the diffusivity of a fluorophore is related to bulk viscosity through the Debye-Stokes-Einstein relationship where the diffusion constant D is inversely proportional to bulk viscosity rj. Established techniques such as fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and fluorescence anisotropy build on the diffusivity of a fluorophore. However, the relationship between diffusivity on a molecular scale and bulk viscosity is always an approximation, because it does not consider molecular-scale effects such as size differences between fluorophore and solvent, electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bond formation, or a possible anisotropy of the environment. Nonetheless, approaches exist to resolve this conflict between bulk viscosity and apparent microviscosity at the molecular scale. Forster and Hoffmann examined some triphenylamine dyes with TICT characteristics. These dyes are characterized by radiationless relaxation from the TICT state. Forster and Hoffmann found a power-law relationship between quantum yield and solvent viscosity both analytically and experimentally [28]. For a quantitative derivation of the power-law relationship, Forster and Hoffmann define the solvent s microfriction k by applying the Debye-Stokes-Einstein diffusion model (2)... [Pg.274]

Loutfy and coworkers [29, 30] assumed a different mechanism of interaction between the molecular rotor molecule and the surrounding solvent. The basic assumption was a proportionality of the diffusion constant D of the rotor in a solvent and the rotational reorientation rate kOI. Deviations from the Debye-Stokes-Einstein hydrodynamic model were observed, and Loutfy and Arnold [29] found that the reorientation rate followed a behavior analogous to the Gierer-Wirtz model [31]. The Gierer-Wirtz model considers molecular free volume and leads to a power-law relationship between the reorientation rate and viscosity. The molecular free volume can be envisioned as the void space between the packed solvent molecules, and Doolittle found an empirical relationship between free volume and viscosity [32] (6),... [Pg.275]

Photosensitization of diaryliodonium salts by anthracene occurs by a photoredox reaction in which an electron is transferred from an excited singlet or triplet state of the anthracene to the diaryliodonium initiator.13"15,17 The lifetimes of the anthracene singlet and triplet states are on the order of nanoseconds and microseconds respectively, and the bimolecular electron transfer reactions between the anthracene and the initiator are limited by the rate of diffusion of reactants, which in turn depends upon the system viscosity. In this contribution, we have studied the effects of viscosity on the rate of the photosensitization reaction of diaryliodonium salts by anthracene. Using steady-state fluorescence spectroscopy, we have characterized the photosensitization rate in propanol/glycerol solutions of varying viscosities. The results were analyzed using numerical solutions of the photophysical kinetic equations in conjunction with the mathematical relationships provided by the Smoluchowski16 theory for the rate constants of the diffusion-controlled bimolecular reactions. [Pg.96]

The coefficients are defined for infinitely dilute solution of solute in the solvent L. However, they are assumed to be valid even for concentrations of solute of 5 to 10 mol.%. The relationships are available for pure solvent, and could be used for mixture of solvents composed of molecules of close size and shape. They all refer to the solvent viscosity which can be estimated or measured. Pressure has a negligible influence on liquid viscosity, which decreases with temperature. As a consequence, pressure has a weak influence on liquid diffusion coefficient conversely, diffusivity increases significantly with temperature (Table 45.4). For mixtures of liquids, an averaged value for the viscosity should be employed. [Pg.1525]

For the solubility of TPA in prepolymer, no data are available and the polymer-solvent interaction parameter X of the Flory-Huggins relationship is not accurately known. No experimental data are available for the vapour pressures of dimer or trimer. The published values for the diffusion coefficient of EG in solid and molten PET vary by orders of magnitude. For the diffusion of water, acetaldehyde and DEG in polymer, no reliable data are available. It is not even agreed upon if the mutual diffusion coefficients depend on the polymer molecular weight or on the melt viscosity, and if they are linear or exponential functions of temperature. Molecular modelling, accompanied by the rapid growth of computer performance, will hopefully help to solve this problem in the near future. The mass-transfer mechanisms for by-products in solid PET are not established, and the dependency of the solid-state polycondensation rate on crystallinity is still a matter of assumptions. [Pg.103]

A method that can decrease the viscosity of the mobile phase without impacting the mobile phase solvent strength (i.e., maintaining k) would therefore decrease the analysis time linearly. The next section illustrates the diffusion coefficients and viscosities, the unique relationship between them for EEL mixtures, their solvent-strength and other important properties. [Pg.425]

The Stokes-Einstein equation (Equation 9.7) is often used to describe the relationship between the diffusion coefficient of a solute and the viscosity of the solution... [Pg.429]

Although the theory of polyelectrolyte dynamics reviewed here provides approximate crossover formulas for the experimentally measured diffusion coefficients, electrophoretic mobility, and viscosity, the validity of the formulas remains to be established. In spite of the success of one unifying conceptual framework to provide valid asymptotic results, in qualitative agreement with experimental facts, it is desirable to establish quantitative validity. This requires (a) gathering of experimental data on well-characterized polyelectrolyte solutions and (b) obtaining the relationships between the various transport coefficients. Such data are not currently available, and experiments of this type are out of fashion. In addition to these experimental challenges, there are many theoretical issues that need further elaboration. A few of these are the following ... [Pg.57]

The diffusion coefficient D is one-third of the time integral over the velocity autocorrelation function CvJJ). The second identity is the so-called Einstein relation, which relates the self-diffusion coefficient to the particle mean square displacement (i.e., the ensemble-averaged square of the distance between the particle position at time r and at time r + f). Similar relationships exist between conductivity and the current autocorrelation function, and between viscosity and the autocorrelation function of elements of the pressure tensor. [Pg.405]


See other pages where Viscosity-Diffusivity Relationships is mentioned: [Pg.286]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.700]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.86]   


SEARCH



Diffusivity viscosity

Viscosity diffusion

© 2024 chempedia.info