Viscosity and molecular dynamics

In recent years several developments of ideas about reaction mechanisms have encouraged a considerable increase in interest in diffusion control of substrate binding and in the internal mobility of protein molecules. The well-established relation between viscosity and bimolecular collision processes has been the subject of many investigations and will be discussed in the next section. Here we shall concern ourselves with a reassessment of the 

As stated before, the present text is not concerned with the theoretical 

Before any further discussion of the effects of viscosity on any reaction in solution, whether colUsion frequencies or structure fluctuations, we have to consider the distinction between macroscopic and microscopic viscosity. A practical definition of viscosity is 

The data for viscosities of solutions are usually given in the literature in terms of poise or centipoise (cp). For practical reasons cgs units are generally used and poise has the units dyne s cm (the dimensions of viscosity are ML t ). Comprehensive tables of viscosities are found in the Handbook ofPhysics and Chemistry. In terms of cp the viscosity of water is 0.890,1.002 and 1.787 at 25,20 and 0 C respectively. An example of the large temperature dependence of the viscosity of water is presented by the decrease in collisional fluorescence quenching on cooling of a solution (see section 8.2). 

To a physical chemist an idealized picture of rigid protein molecules always did appear improbable. Secondary and tertiary protein structure is maintained by a system of hydrogen bonds, complementary charge pairs and non-polar interactions. The equilibria between intramolecular and intermolecular (with water) pairing of the first and second of these are not far from unity and are, therefore, readily perturbed. Two types of flexibility with consequences for the reaction profile of protein molecules were to be expected, and indeed have been found to occur. These have already been 

---

Grubisic et al. (3) showed that for many polymers a single calibration curve can be drawn through a plot of the product of intrinsic viscosity and molecular weight ( [7/] M) vs. retention volume. This relationship certainly supports the model of molecular separation based on hydro-dynamic volume since [77] M is proportional to the hydrodynamic volume of the molecule in solution. Hence, molecular weights of the two polymers (calibration standard polymer and sample) which have identical retention volume under identical GPC analytical conditions can be expressed in terms of each other by combining the Grubisic relationship ... 

We here showed that for bentonite clay, we can determine the nano-scale material properties such as diffusion coefficient and viscosity by molecular dynamics (MD) simulation and extend the microscale characteristics to the macroscale behavior by the multiscale homogenization analysis (HA) method. A seepage flow and diffusion problem is treated. The micro/macro problem can be simulated well by this procedure if we know the microscale geometrical characteristics. 

The hydrodynamic diameter of hyperbranched polymer has also been determined by the application of the Hester and Mitchell equation. This equation relates the molar mass, the intrinsic viscosity and molecular hydro-dynamic diameter ... 

At first glance Molecular Dynamics looks like a simplistic brute force attempt to literally reproduce what we believe is happening in the real world. Given a set of the initial velocities and coordinates, it tries to integrate the equations of motion numerically. Following the trajectory, MD provides information necessary to calculate various time correlation functions, the frequency spectra, diffusion coefficients, viscosity, and other dynamic properties. It also calculates thermodynamic properties (P, T,...) as time averages at equilibrium. 

A C n.m.r. spin-lattice relaxation study of solvent effects on the rotational dynamics of methyl a- and /9-glycosides has been reported. Rotation rates for both anomers follow the order Me0H-DMF-D20molecular weights of the solvents. 

Ghatee MH, Zare M, Moosavi F, Zolghadr AR (2010) Ttanptaature-dependent dcarsity and viscosity of the ionic liquids l -alkyl-3-methylimidazolium iodides experiment and molecular dynamics simulation. J Chem Eng Data 55 3084-3088... 

Monte Carlo simulations require less computer time to execute each iteration than a molecular dynamics simulation on the same system. However, Monte Carlo simulations are more limited in that they cannot yield time-dependent information, such as diffusion coefficients or viscosity. As with molecular dynamics, constant NVT simulations are most common, but constant NPT simulations are possible using a coordinate scaling step. Calculations that are not constant N can be constructed by including probabilities for particle creation and annihilation. These calculations present technical difficulties due to having very low probabilities for creation and annihilation, thus requiring very large collections of molecules and long simulation times. 

Molecular dynamics calculations are more time-consuming than Monte Carlo calculations. This is because energy derivatives must be computed and used to solve the equations of motion. Molecular dynamics simulations are capable of yielding all the same properties as are obtained from Monte Carlo calculations. The advantage of molecular dynamics is that it is capable of modeling time-dependent properties, which can not be computed with Monte Carlo simulations. This is how diffusion coefficients must be computed. It is also possible to use shearing boundaries in order to obtain a viscosity. Molec-... 

---