Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Viscosities of the blends

The flow behavior of the polymer blends is quite complex, influenced by the equilibrium thermodynamic, dynamics of phase separation, morphology, and flow geometry [2]. The flow properties of a two phase blend of incompatible polymers are determined by the properties of the component, that is the continuous phase while adding a low-viscosity component to a high-viscosity component melt. As long as the latter forms a continuous phase, the viscosity of the blend remains high. As soon as the phase inversion [2] occurs, the viscosity of the blend falls sharply, even with a relatively low content of low-viscosity component. Therefore, the S-shaped concentration dependence of the viscosity of blend of incompatible polymers is an indication of phase inversion. The temperature dependence of the viscosity of blends is determined by the viscous flow of the dispersion medium, which is affected by the presence of a second component. [Pg.611]

Variation of melt viscosity for both the preblends and preheated blends with the blend ratio are shown in Fig. 25. The viscosity of the blends gradually decreases with the addition of the AU in the blends. This decrease is more drastic in the higher shear rate region. In the case of the preheated blends, viscosity does not change much with the addition of AU in the blend up to a 50 50 blend... [Pg.619]

Viscosities of the blends and composites were measured in shear flow with a Gottfert Rheograph 2002 capillary viscosimeter. The shear rate was investigated from 100-10000 s" . The L D ratio of the capillary die was 30 mm 1 mm. Rabinowitch correction was made to the measurements, but Bagley correction was not applied. [Pg.625]

The reactive extrusion of polypropylene-natural rubber blends in the presence of a peroxide (1,3-bis(/-butyl per-oxy benzene) and a coagent (trimethylol propane triacrylate) was reported by Yoon et al. [64]. The effect of the concentration of the peroxide and the coagent was evaiuated in terms of thermal, morphological, melt, and mechanical properties. The low shear viscosity of the blends increased with the increase in peroxide content initially, and beyond 0.02 phr the viscosity decreased with peroxide content (Fig. 9). The melt viscosity increased with coagent concentration at a fixed peroxide content. The morphology of the samples indicated a decrease in domain size of the dispersed NR phase with a lower content of the peroxide, while at a higher content the domain size increases. The reduction in domain size... [Pg.675]

The results of viscosity versus shear rate are reported in Fig. 11 for the two pure components and their blend, respectively. The temperatures were the same for the viscosity measurements and for the injection molding. At temperatures of 280°C and 320°C, the viscosities of the blend are found to be values between the limits of the two pure components. In both cases, the TLCP still... [Pg.692]

For blends made up of two fractions of different molecular weight, the viscosity of the blend y h is at a given temperature in some cases approximated by... [Pg.96]

Bandyopadhyay et al. [138] have also studied the distribution of nanoclays such as NA and 30B in NR/ENR (containing 50 mol% epoxy) and NR/BR blends and their effect on the overall properties of the resultant nanocomposite blends. They calculated the preferential distribution of clays at various loadings in the blend compounds from the viscoelastic property studies from DMA. The tensile properties of the 50 50 NR/ENR and 50 50 NR/BR blend nanocomposites are shown in Table 5. It is apparent that in both the blends that the mechanical properties increase with increasing clay concentration up to a certain extent and then decrease. These results have been found to depend on matrix polarity and the viscosity of the blend compounds. [Pg.34]

In practical terms, very good durability can be achieved by increasing the Mw of the PMMA component. Since PVdF plasticizes the PMMA, the melt viscosity of the blend was not appreciably changed by increasing the Mw of the PMMA component from 100,000 to 200,000. This change did, however, effectively double the exposure lifetime through which the maximum tensile properties of the polyblend were maintained. [Pg.40]

The equation uses molar mass and specific temperature as the input parameters and offers a means of estimation of the viscosity of a wide range of petroleum fractions. Other work has focused on the prediction of the viscosity of blends of lubricating oils as a means of accurately predicting the viscosity of the blend from the viscosities of the base oil components (Al-Besharah et al., 1989). [Pg.78]

The blending chart in Fig. 1 in Chapter 5 shows an exponential dependence of solution viscosity on concentration, within the range of maximum measurable concentration (100%). Rheometry permits higher c, than does viscome-try. As a prerequisite to construction of a linear polysaccharide blending chart, the linear range of t sv/ci vs ci should first be established, because it is only then that the viscosity of the blend will be equal to the sum of the viscosities of the components. Each ordinate in Fig. 1 in Chapter 5 is labeled with the maximum ct of the two polysaccharides of interest or its equivalent as 100%. [Pg.155]

In addition, for polymer blends, the ratio of melt viscosities r = r)dKp(.r< / of the blend partners has a major influence on the melting process. In this case, r dlspen is the viscosity of the blend partner present in the dispersed phase and r)rn is the viscosity of the blend partner present in the continuous phase. The smaller the value of r, the sooner the melting process begins, but also the longer it takes [9]. In unfavorable process conditions, as yet unplasticized particles may be encountered in the compounded pellets (see Fig. 4.5). [Pg.61]

Two monodisperse polystyrenes are mixed in equal quantities by weight. One polymer has molecular weight of 39,000 and the other molecular weight of 292,000. What is the intrinsic viscosity of the blend in benzene at 25°C The Mark-Houwink constants for polystyrene/benzene are k = 9.18 X 10 dl/gandfl = 0.74. [Pg.115]

DBTDL was used as a catalyst in the frontal polymerization of 1,6-hexanediisocyanate with ethylene glycol. In frontal polymerization the polymerization is locally initiated and the exotherm of the reaction propagates the polymerization throughout the system. Pyrocatechol was used to avoid spontaneous polymerization. Pyrocatechol chelates tin and depresses the catalytic activity at room temperature without affecting catalysis at the higher temperature. To achieve a uniform advancing reactive front, and to avoid fingering, the viscosity of the blend was increased with colloidal silica. [Pg.694]

On a cost-benefit basis, it is interesting to outline that the best mechanical performances of the PE-PS polyblends can be reached using a minimum amount (ca. 2wt%) of an appropriate diblock copolymer (19). Furthermore, not only reproducible samples can be prepared under processing conditions, but an apparent equilibrium of phase morphology and mechanical properties is obtained within half to a few minutes depending on the melt viscosity of the blend and especially the microstructure of the diblock copolymer. [Pg.50]

Viscosity curves obtained with constant-shear viscosimetry are shown in Figure 11. In this land of measurement, phase separation is monitored, but the same behavior is obtained with the three types of phase separation. As in the high-strain dynamic measurements, the constant shear applied during phase separation forbids the formation of a continuous (3-phase, which would normally exist in type 2 and 3 blends. On the contrary, because it is liquid, the a-phase can be continuous, and in all cases the viscosity of this phase governs the viscosity of the blend. The fast increase in viscosity is therefore characteristic of the gelation of the a-phase. [Pg.82]

Occasionally, as in the confectionery industry, it may be desired to blend two products of widely differing viscosities, such as com sirup and liquid sugar. An approximation of the viscosity of such a blend may be obtained by proportioning the logarithms of the viscosities of these products using the antilog as the approximate viscosity of the blend. [Pg.40]


See other pages where Viscosities of the blends is mentioned: [Pg.365]    [Pg.589]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.1053]    [Pg.1058]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.589]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.676]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.784]    [Pg.796]    [Pg.811]    [Pg.507]    [Pg.534]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.740]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.153]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.754 ]




SEARCH



Viscosities of blends

© 2024 chempedia.info