Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Vectors essential elements

Besides the apparent similarities. Table 8.1 illustrates also the obvious formal differences between bras and kets and their second quantized counterparts. Namely, the corresponding symbols are mathematically very different. The bra and ket vectors are elements of a linear vector space over which quantum-mechanical operators are defined, while the creation and annihilation operators are defined over the abstract space of particle number represented wave functions serving as their carrier space. This carrier space leads to the concept of the vacuum state, which has no analog in the bra-ket formalism. Moreover, an essential difference is that the effect of second quantized operators depends on the occupancies of the one-electron levels in the wave function, since no annihilation is possible from an empty level and no electron can be created on an occupied spinorbital. At the same time, the occupancies of orbitals play no role in evaluating bra and ket expressions. Of course, both formalisms yield identical results after calculating the values of matrix elements. [Pg.58]

But then is the characteristic polynomial of A, and its coefficients are the elements of / and can be found by solving Eq. (2-11). This is essentially the method of Krylov, who chose, in particular, a vector et (usually ej) for vx. Several methods of reduction of the matrix A can be derived from applying particular methods of inverting or factoring V at the same time that the successive columns of V are being developed. Note first that if... [Pg.73]

To sum up, the basic idea of the Doppler-selected TOF technique is to cast the differential cross-section S ajdv3 in a Cartesian coordinate, and to combine three dispersion techniques with each independently applied along one of the three Cartesian axes. As both the Doppler-shift (vz) and ion velocity (vy) measurements are essentially in the center-of-mass frame, and the (i j-componcnl, associated with the center-of-mass velocity vector can be made small and be largely compensated for by a slight shift in the location of the slit, the measured quantity in the Doppler-selected TOF approach represents directly the center-of-mass differential cross-section in terms of per velocity volume element in a Cartesian coordinate, d3a/dvxdvydvz. As such, the transformation of the raw data to the desired doubly differential cross-section becomes exceedingly simple and direct, Eq. (11). [Pg.11]

The Navier-Stokes equations have a complex form due to the necessity of treating many of the terms as vector quantities. To understand these equations, however, one need only recognize that they are not mass balances but an elaboration of Newton s second law of motion for a flowing fluid. Recall that Newton s second law states that the vector sum of all the forces acting on an object ( F) will be equal to the product of the object s mass (m) and its acceleration (a), or XF = ma. Now consider the first of the three Navier-Stokes equations listed above, Eq. (10). The object in this case is a differential fluid element, that is, a small cube of fluid with volume dx dy dz and mass p(dx dy dz). The left-hand side of the equation is essentially the product of mass and acceleration for this fluid element (ma), while the right-hand side represents the sum of the forces... [Pg.28]

Since the theory under examination works exclusively on scales essentially exceeding size a of a monomeric unit, the function D(Q) has a physical meaning only at Q wave vector can be calculated via the relationship... [Pg.164]

Indeed, we have discussed the matrix elements involved in these formulas (see Eqs. (36), (52), and (56)) as well as the physical meaning of the Fourier coefficients pk p] t). However, the mathematical expressions are often rather involved and it is convenient, especially in specific applications, to introduce a diagram technique in order to represent the various terms of these general formulas.28 We first notice that in Eqs. (41) and (42), the momenta p,- essentially appear as parameters indeed, according to Eq. (52) only the wave-vectors are explicitly modified by the interactions. This is the reason why we shall only represent these wave numbers graphically it should, however, be kept in mind that the momenta are effectively affected by the interactions through the differential operators d/dp ... [Pg.172]

An essential part of the data reduction is the indexing. In this procedure all positions on the recorded image where intensity from reflected beams can be expected have to be is determined irrespectively whether the reflection is strong or weak. In the two-dimensional reciprocal space every reflection can be indicated by a vector H which has two integer elements, h and k, the indices. All position in reciprocal space can be described as ... [Pg.358]

For most numerically solved models, a control-volume approach is used. This approach is based on dividing the modeling domain into a mesh. Between mesh points, there are finite elements or boxes. Using Taylor series expansions, the governing equations are cast in finite-difference form. Next, the equations for the two half-boxes on either side of a mesh point are set equal to each other hence, mass is rigorously conserved. This approach requires that all vectors be defined at half-mesh points, all scalars at full-mesh points, and all reaction rates at quarter-mesh points. The exact details of the numerical methods can be found elsewhere (for example, see ref 273) and are not the purview of this review article. The above approach is essentially the same as that used in CFD packages (e.g.. Fluent) or discussed in Appendix C of ref 139 and is related to other numerical methods applied to fuel-cell modeling. ... [Pg.470]

Then, the compositions of the essential (> 5 volume %) minerals in the rocks to be classified are defined in a composition matrix (C) and used, in conjunction with a second matrix (7) defining what minerals are employed in classification (the classifying minerals e.g., quartz, plagloclase, alkali feldspar), to obtain a third matrix (1/1/) containing a set of independent vectors containing major element coefficients. When multiplied by the un-standardized molar element quantities, they produce un-standardized molar classifying mineral quantities that are un-affected by the presence of nonclassifying minerals in the rocks. [Pg.322]

By strobing the time intervals such that their number equals the number of k values, we can try to invert the e"1 matrix of Eq. (7) to obtain the unknown Xm vector. However, it follows from Eq. (8) that the em matrix cannot be inverted, as it contains a number of columns, explicitly all the s = s columns, composed of a single number. This is due to the fact that for s = s the Eg - Es> terms vanish, leaving the ys decay rates as the only source of time-dependence. Since for spontaneous radiative decay (and many other processes), the decay times, l/ys, are orders of magnitude longer than the duration of the sub-picosecond measurement, the e s s matrix elements are essentially time-independent and hence identical to one another at different times. As a result, the e matrix, which becomes nearly singular, cannot be inverted. [Pg.802]

Pattern Recognition. An alternative treatment of the data is possible and has been discussed by some of us (70). This approach involves the application of pattern recognition, a subject which has received considerable attention in the recent literature. Essentially, the technique involves the transformation of the concentrations of the five target (fingerprint) elements into points in 5-dimensional space which is represented by "pattern vector", for example ... [Pg.386]

Y is a matrix that consists of all the individual measurements. The absorption spectra, measured at nX wavelengths, form nA-dimensional vectors, which are arranged as rows of Y. Thus, if nt spectra are measured at nt reaction times, Y contains nt rows of nX elements it is an nt x nX matrix. As the structures of Beer-Lambert s law and the mathematical law for matrix multiplication are essentially identical, this matrix... [Pg.219]

In equ. (8.51) the summation over the magnetic quantum numbers takes care of the unobserved substates, and the -function ensures energy conservation. The essential part which is of interest in the present context is the transition matrix element rfi(KamSa, KbmSb ho>) whose dependence on the wave vectors Ka and Kb of the emitted electrons with spin projections mSa and and on the photon energy Ho) is indicated explicitly. Following the detailed discussion in [TAA87] this matrix... [Pg.332]


See other pages where Vectors essential elements is mentioned: [Pg.210]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.950]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.629]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.721]    [Pg.742]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.138]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.122 ]




SEARCH



Elements, essential

© 2024 chempedia.info