Variance component analysis

For each mass on the Product W curve, the data will be analyzed by variance components analysis (VGA) to estimate the precision components due to InterOperator, InterDay, InterAssay, and Repeatability. For each expected mass, the precision components will be recorded as a variance, standard deviation, and percent of total precision. Nonzero components will be reported with a two-sided 95% confidence interval for the standard deviation. Within each mass, total variance is defined as the sum of the variance components. Total precision will be expressed as a variance, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation (%CV) also called the percent relative standard deviation or %RSD. 

Method of moments estimates (also known as ANOVA estimates) can be calculated directly from the raw data as long as the design is balanced. The reader is referred to Searle et al. (11) for a thorough but rather technical presentation of variance components analysis. The equations that follow show the ANOVA estimates for the validation example. First, a two-factor with interaction ANOVA table is computed (Table 7). Then the observed mean squares are equated to the expected mean squares and solved for the variance components (Table 8 and the equations that follow). 

Table 1 Variance Component Analysis Results for Within Run (Repeatability) and Between Run (Intermediate Precision) Variability for Each of the Several True Potencies...

Biological assays are often noisy and laborious. With careful application of experimental design, cell culture bioassays can be made quite accurate and precise. The core information needed for validation can come from two experiments. One experiment studies accuracy and precision followed by a variance component analysis and a summary table that describes the expected performance of the system at various levels of replication. A second experiment uses a minimal fractional factorial design to study robustness, followed by a comparison of confidence intervals on effect sizes with a previously established indifference zone. 

Jacobson L, Middleton B, Holmgren J, Eirefelt S, Frqjd M, Blomgren A, Gustavsson L. An optimized automated assay for determination of metabolic stability using hepatocytes Assay validation, variance component analysis, and in vivo relevance. Assay Drug Dev Technol 2007 5(3) 403—415. 

The important underlying components of protein motion during a simulation can be extracted by a Principal Component Analysis (PGA). It stands for a diagonalization of the variance-covariance matrix R of the mass-weighted internal displacements during a molecular dynamics simulation. 

The data from sensory evaluation and texture profile analysis of the jellies made with amidated pectin and sunflower pectin were subjected to Principal component analysis (PC) using the statistical software based on Jacobi method (Univac, 1973). The results of PC analysis are shown in figure 7. The plane of two principal components (F1,F2) explain 89,75 % of the variance contained in the original data. The attributes related with textural evaluation are highly correlated with the first principal component (Had.=0.95, Spr.=0.97, Che.=0.98, Gum.=0.95, Coe=0.98, HS=0.82 and SP=-0.93). As it could be expected, spreadability increases along the negative side of the axis unlike other textural parameters. 

To further analyze the relationships within descriptor space we performed a principle component analysis of the whole data matrix. Descriptors have been normalized before the analysis to have a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1. The first two principal components explain 78% of variance within the data. The resultant loadings, which characterize contributions of the original descriptors to these principal components, are shown on Fig. 5.8. On the plot we can see that PSA, Hhed and Uhba are indeed closely grouped together. Calculated octanol-water partition coefficient CLOGP is located in the opposite corner of the property space. This analysis also demonstrates that CLOGP and PSA are the two parameters with... 

However, there is a mathematical method for selecting those variables that best distinguish between formulations—those variables that change most drastically from one formulation to another and that should be the criteria on which one selects constraints. A multivariate statistical technique called principal component analysis (PCA) can effectively be used to answer these questions. PCA utilizes a variance-covariance matrix for the responses involved to determine their interrelationships. It has been applied successfully to this same tablet system by Bohidar et al. [18]. 

In the case that interactions prove to be insignificant, it should be gone over to the ab model the estimations of which for the various variance components is more reliable than that of the 2ab model. A similar scheme can be used for three-way ANOVA when the factor c is varied at two levels. In the general, three-way analysis bases on block-designed experiments as shown in Fig. 5.1. 

The main difference between factor analysis and principal component analysis is the way in which the variances of Eq. (8.20) are handled. Whereas the interest of FA is directed on the common variance var Xij)comm and both the other terms are summarized as unique variance... 

Musumarra et al. [43] identified miconazole and other drugs by principal components analysis of standardized thin-layer chromatographic data in four eluent systems. The eluents, ethylacetate methanol 30% ammonium hydroxide (85 10 15), cyclohexane-toluene-diethylamine (65 25 10), ethylacetate chloroform (50 50), and acetone with the plates dipped in potassium hydroxide solution, provided a two-component model that accounts for 73% of the total variance. The scores plot allowed the restriction of the range of inquiry to a few candidates. This result is of great practical significance in analytical toxicology, especially when account is taken of the cost, the time, the analytical instrumentation and the simplicity of the calculations required by the method. 

Methods Results The flow diagram (Fig. 2) outlines the methods used for the review and separation of the rocks present in the area. Image enhancement is done to increase the variance in the dataset. Contrast manipulation, spatial feature manipulation, and multi-image manipulation are used as digital enhancement techniques (Lillesand et al. 2007). In this study multi-image manipulation is used, which includes Band Ratio and Principal Component Analysis. 

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is a complex statistical approach for highlighting the variance in the image using multiplication of original data with eigenvectors. (NASA Remote Sensing... 

Now comes the very principle of the principal component analysis. A total variance is now defined as the trace of the matrix Sx or, using a property of the trace of a matrix product given in Section 2.2... 

Figure 4.12 Principal component analysis of the major elements in Coumiac limestones. 91 percent of the variance is explained by the first two components. The data can be explained by the combination of three chemical end-members calcitic (CaO and C02), detrital (Si02 and A1203), and organic (organic C and Fe203). Because of the closure condition these three end-members translate into only two significant components.

Figure 4.13 Principal component analysis of the mean isotopic data for oceanic islands (courtesy of Vincent Salters). In the top left corner, the plane of the first two components (the Mantle Plane of Zindler et al, 1982) explains 93 percent of the variance. Component 1 is dominated by lead isotopes, component 2 by Sr and Nd isotopes. Other components are plotted for reference. In the top right corner, the Mantle Plane is viewed sideways along the direction of the second component, so the distance of each point to the plane can be easily seen. In the bottom left corner, it is viewed along the axis of the first component. The bottom right corner shows how little variance is left with components 3 and 4.

---