Vapour pressure extractive distillation

The thermodynamic aspect of osmotic pressure is to be sought in the expenditure of work required to separate solvent from solute. The separation may be carried out in other ways than by osmotic processes thus, if we have a solution of ether in benzene, we can separate the ether through a membrane permeable to it, or we may separate it by fractional distillation, or by freezing out benzene, or lastly by extracting the mixture with water. These different processes will involve the expenditure of work in different ways, but, provided the initial and final states are the same in each case, and all the processes are carried out isothermally and reversibly, the quantities of work are equal. This gives a number of relations between the different properties, such as vapour pressure and freezing-point, to which we now turn our attention. 

The separation of a particular component from a mixture may be carried out by exploiting differences in physical properties. The most common techniques distillation, crystallisation and liquid-liquid extraction, rely on differences in vapour pressure or solubility of the components. In the case of molecular isomers, however, their physical properties are often similar, rendering traditional separation techniques inefficient or unusable. For example, if one considers the isomers ethylbenzene, para-, meta- and ortho-xylene, their normal boiling points are 136.2 °C, 138.4 °C, 139.1 °C and 144.4 °C, making their separation by distillation impracticable. Thus, the method of selective inclusion becomes an attractive possibility. 

Samples from aquatic environments (sediments, fish), containing appreciably high amounts of fatty material can efficiently be prepared by Steam-Distillation-Extraction (SDE). In particular, pesticides and herbicides which have appreciably greater vapour pressure than those of water soluble chemicals can be extracted with high recovery yields using different SDE units [39-43]. ... 

The emphasis on vapour-liquid equilibria (including vapour pressure) is inherant in the petroleum industry due to the importance of distillation in separations. If separations by extraction are to be undertaken, then liquid-liquid equilibrium is equally important. Fugacities for thermodynamic equilibrium (flash calculations) are probably one of the most sought-after properties. This is because fugacities and enthalpies often provide sufficient information to calculate a mass and energy balance. 

Distillation/rectification is by far the most common separation process in the chemical industry. Here, the difference in vapour pressure/fugacity of the different components of a reaction mixture is used as the driving force for separation. Extractive distillation, extraction and absorption processes gain importance, if distillation proves unfeasible, for exan5)le, due... 

The pyrometallurgical methods were developed based on the differences between zirconium and hafnium in oxidation and reduction characteristics [11, 12] volatility [13-16] electrochemical properties [17-19] and molten metal-molten salt equilibrium [20, 21], The extractive distillation process, using carbochlori-nation of zircon [13], is in operation by CEZUS in France. Both chlorides are sublimated and run through a vertical distillation column containing molten aluminium chloride and potassium chloride. Both hafnium and zirconium tetrachloride chlorides dissolve, but hafnium tetrachloride has a higher vapour pressure and is therefore condensed from the top of the column in a hafnium-enriched mixture. The zirconium tetrachloride is partitioned to a liquid phase and recovered from a salt, typically containing less than 50 ppm hafnium. 

Several techniques have been envisaged and investigated to perform this An back-extraction. Precipitation and distillation are not suitable for the objective because precipitation leads to the recovery of An-Al intermetallic alloys [8] while distillation leads to an important volatilisation of americium. This point was easily demonstrated, performing thermodynamic calculations on Am vapour pressure with HSC Chemistry software [9]. 

Vinylacetic acid. Place 134 g. (161 ml.) of allyl cyanide (3) and 200 ml. of concentrated hydrochloric acid in a 1-htre round-bottomed flask attached to a reflux condenser. Warm the mixture cautiously with a small flame and shake from time to time. After 7-10 minutes, a vigorous reaction sets in and the mixture refluxes remove the flame and cool the flask, if necessary, in cold water. Ammonium chloride crystallises out. When the reaction subsides, reflux the mixture for 15 minutes. Then add 200 ml. of water, cool and separate the upper layer of acid. Extract the aqueous layer with three 100 ml. portions of ether. Combine the acid and the ether extracts, and remove the ether under atmospheric pressure in a 250 ml. Claisen flask with fractionating side arm (compare Fig. II, 13, 4) continue the heating on a water bath until the temperature of the vapour reaches 70°. Allow the apparatus to cool and distil under diminished pressure (compare Fig. II, 20, 1) , collect the fraction (a) distilling up to 71°/14 mm. and (6) at 72-74°/14 mm. (chiefly at 72 5°/ 14 mm.). A dark residue (about 10 ml.) and some white sohd ( crotonio acid) remains in the flask. Fraction (6) weighs 100 g. and is analytically pure vinylacetic acid. Fraction (a) weighs about 50 g. and separates into two layers remove the water layer, dry with anhydrous sodium sulphate and distil from a 50 ml. Claisen flask with fractionating side arm a further 15 g. of reasonably pure acid, b.p. 69-70°/12 mm., is obtained. 

---