Pure reason

See Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason (Norton ed.) 54 and preface to Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, quoted in Frederick Gregory, "Romantic Kantianism and the End of the Newtonian Dream in Chemistry," Archives Internationales d Histoire des Sciences 34 (1984) 108123, on 109. 

Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, tr. N. Kemp Smith (London St. Martins Press 1965), p. 114. 

Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Pure Reason. New York St. Martins Press, 1965. 

The Critique of Pure Reason Preface to First Edition (p. 1)... 

A last question remains How do we choose the function L for a given mechanical system A very important part of the answer is that L cannot, in principle, be derived by pure reasoning. L has to be chosen such that the equations of motion obtained from the principle of least action refiect the physical reality. 

The superiority of pure reasoning, especially scientific and mathematical logic, lay in the fact that it was "pure of pain, maximally stable, and directed at the truth." The objects of such reasoning "are eternally what they are regardless of what human beings do and say." What one loved, or should love, Plato claimed, was not the beloved himself but rather the pure forms of unalloyed beauty reflected in the beloved. Only in this way could love remain straight and rational, free of the appetites. 

Kant dealt at length with the notion of a schema in his Critique of Pure Reason (see particularly chapter 1 of the Transcendental Doctrine of Judgment ), and his views have been widely quoted. Essentially, Kant believed that there are pure concepts or categories of understanding that exist a priori in the mind. The difficulty... 

Page numbers refer to Kant s page numbers in his second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason. In most translations, A refers to pages from the first edition and B to the second. 

Kant, Immanuel (1968). Critique of pure reason (Norman Kemp Smith, Trans.). New York St. Martin s Press. (Original work published... 

Though Kant made brief comments about science in his Critique of Pure Reason and in the Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, his most developed views can be found in the preface of his Metaphysische Anfangsgriinde der Naturwissenschaft of 1786 (further MAdN).2 The title of the latter already indicates that science is only possible because of certain metaphysical foundations. 

Karl Marx applied the dialectic to more conventionally historical subjects than the representation of mascnhnity. However, Marx was no film critic his lifespan precluded that possibihty. Even so, he perhaps foreshadows Abbott and Costello s classic shtick, Who s on First in his bouncy, probably inadvertently comical exposition of the dialectical process. Marx starts with Hegel s Critique of Pure Reason ... 

Aristotle used observation as well as pure reasoning to arrive at his ideas. He reasoned that wood when burned produces smoke (air), pitch (water), ash (earth), and fire therefore wood is composed of these elements. Flint when sparked produces fire therefore fire is an element in rock. Some rocks thrown in water bubble as air trapped in crevices escapes. To someone with no other evidence to go on, this would prove that air is an element in rock. Some crystals dissolved in water turn the water cold some crystals dissolved in water heat the water, so hot and cold would appear to be qualities inherent in these materials. 

Imagination is more logical than pure reason because it is embodied it does not need proof [...] Justice is created by material acts not by desires in the imagination. Imagination seeks reason and understanding. This makes it vulnerable to social madness [...] Art is not transcendental - nothing is. If art is to free some, it must be possible for it to drive others deeper into corruption. (Bond, 2000b, pp. 168-9)... 

Levesque, H., guest editor. Open Peer Commentaries on Drew McDermott s A Critique of Pure Reason Taking Issue Section, Computational Intelligence, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 149-237, August 1987. 

Kant, Immanuel. 1965. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Norman Kemp Smith. New York Saint Martin s. 

The scientific revolution began in 1543, signaled by the publication of two books. The first book, by Copernicus, armormced his Srm-centered universe theory. The second book, by Vesalius, gave an accurate description of human anatomy. The reason these books mark the beginning of the scientific revolution is the methods Copernicus and Vesalius used to learn about the natural world-they both used observation Instead of pure reason. 

---